Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
90 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Introducing "Think Twice" Word Detection System To OpEdNews

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Become a Fan
  (239 fans)

opednews.com

We're about to go live with a new innovation that we think is important to keep our site a place where courteous, intelligent civil discourse is maintained. We're proud that we can claim that to our knowledge there is no high traffic (top 6000 sites in USA according to Alexa.com, top 500 blog sites according to technorati) where as wide a range of discussion on issues is allowed. Many sites ban discussion of some of the topics we allow or only allow one-sided discussion and advocacy.

We call the new innovation our "Think Twice" system. It uses software we've custom designed to detect the use of words we add to a control panel, then delivers a message to the content submitter. The message has two parts-- one specific to the word and the other describing the category of word. We've identified three categories of words to be detected by the "Think Twice" system, listed immediately below, and explained in detail further below.

-Foul language,

-Hurtful, Offensive and Hate

-Languaged words

When a person submits content (article, diary, comment, quicklink) the "Think Twice" system will, when the writer previews the writing, present a screen that lists the word or words, the explanation of our concerns and suggestions, with a button to return to revise the article or proceed to the next step to publish it. There will be no censorship.

We will track the use of this language. Currently we will do nothing with the tracking except look for patterns. If a member uses the same words and language very often, we'll be able to easily see. Is the person a thread hijacker, bringing up issues that are not really relevant... often?

We may decide to post a warning icon on comments, below the user name, signifying the category of word that is in the comment (remember, comments are not moderated before coming live on the site.) This is a way to protect readers, let's say, who don't want to encounter foul language. But that function is NOT currently up and running.

This whole project started after a passionate discussion on banning the words zionist, zionism, islamicist and islamicism, here Banning some words HERE on This Website.

That led me to realize just how wide a range of discussion we allow, and how rare it is. For example, I was speaking with a widely respected leader of a local peace group and he told me that one of the reasons they'd been able to stay in existence for over 26 years was they do not allow discussion of the middle east. He explained that this was a policy that higher ups above the local level instituted as policy.

The Middle East is a very difficult, challenging area for conversation and it is often abused as a vehicle for bigots and members of hate groups to express veiled hate.

Here at OpEdNews.com we welcome discussion by advocates for and supporters of both the Palestinians and Palestine and Israelis and Israel. But we require that it be civil, meet the basic rules of netiquette and never engage in hate.

This project is an experiment-- an attempt to raise consciousness and awareness using the technology we have available to us, and to let haters know we are keeping an eye on them. If your intention is serious, sincere, well intended advocacy or just creative discussion of issues, your participation, your contribution of content is welcome and encouraged and we hope you'll see the "Think Twice" system as a handy reminder that helps you write more effectively and considerately. If you find it intrusive, consider that there are, to the best of our knowledge, no other sites on the web where such a wide range of discussion of issues is allowed. This system is part of what enables us to make it possible.

First, here are the three word categories we've identified and the message content submitters get when using them:


Languaged Words You've used a "Languaged word."

"Languaged words" are words that certain groups have sort of taken ownership of, expending much effort in imbuing upon those words overlying meaning, often creating a reflex reaction to the words. For example, "death tax" is a phrase that right wingers use instead of the more neutral inheritance tax. Another example is "iraq war" which is a phrase that the war and occupancy opponents believe is better characterized as the "Iraq occupancy."

This note is just a suggestion that you think twice about your use of this word and consider using alternative wording. But the choice is yours. You make the final decision.



Foul Language -You've used a word that we consider "foul language." We suggest and request that you consider using other language. There are times when foul language is the best way to express an idea. But we've found that over-used, it lowers the discourse and professionalism of the conversation, the community and the website. Very often, writers regret the use of the foul language later. Also, there are some readers who do NOT ever use foul language and they find its use offensive. Many in this category will just stop reading your article. If your goal is to communicate, then for them, you have failed, even though they might otherwise find your message valuable. This is just a suggestion. The final decision is yours. View Modify


Hurtful, Offensive and Hate -You've used a word that we feel is often abused, used as a foil to hide hate and bigotry, or inappropriately used, often causing hurt and communicating bigotry or hate. We encourage you to be very careful in your use of this word and, preferably, to use an alternate word, particularly if you are not certain that your use is precise and clear, not potentially labeling with too broad a stroke.

It may be that your use of the word is totally appropriate. This message is an automated software function aimed to get our content contributors to be more conscious of their use of words. That's why we call it "THINK TWICE."

The final decision of whether you use the word or not is up to you.

Next, we've begun identifying words that are worthy of the "Think Twice" approach, that we want our writers to seriously consider how they use them.

Word: c-word
Explanation: This is a highly offensive word to most women. There are very few times when it is ever necessary to use it. If you do chose to use it, your content will be carefully scrutinized for potential troll rating and if it is an abusive, hurtful use, you will, as would be the case at any site, be subject to consideration for banning.
Type: Hurtful, Offensive and Hate

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and website architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and publisher of Storycon.org, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Listen to over 150 of Rob's Podcast interviews here.

Mediate ranks Rob Kall among the top 180 print/online columnists, often ahead of NY Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post columnists.

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey and Positive Psychology. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. Watch me speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

 See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about Rob and OpEdNews.com, check out 
A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And Rob's quotes are here.

To watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, former Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video. 

Rob's radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also hosted a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
90 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

try it out. Use one of the words in your comment by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 2:05:09 PM
I tried it and like it! by Steven Leser on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 2:27:54 PM
The Z-word ? by Tony Forest on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 2:33:39 PM
Good work. by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 11:31:53 PM
boy, can I relate by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 10:41:20 AM
I do not want to sound like a party pooper by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 2:11:44 PM
ahhh, another way to think about it by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 3:06:39 PM
duh duh duh by Tony Forest on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 2:27:18 PM
good by Tony Forest on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 2:29:36 PM
just jousting by Tony Forest on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 2:37:55 PM
Word abuse... by tinalouise on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 5:18:58 PM
What is the point of the colors? by llaitner on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 5:51:26 PM
Use the mouse by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:30:42 PM
It works! by Sandy Sand on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:59:15 PM
This could be fun... by John R Moffett on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 6:11:05 PM
"Introducing "Think Twice" Word Detection System To OpEdNews by TroubledTexan on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 6:46:11 PM
amber by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:19:15 PM
"Introducing "Think Twice" Word Detection System To OpEdNews by TroubledTexan on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:45:04 PM
Introducing "Think Twice" Word Detection System To OpEdNews" by TroubledTexan on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 6:58:21 PM
What's a "Klansman"? by mrk * on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:03:53 PM
So, define what these odious, illegal, etc people are by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:34:28 PM
NOT That You'll EVER Read this Reply by mrk * on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 5:22:24 PM
"So, define what these odious, illegal, etc people are" by TroubledTexan on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 6:41:12 PM
Completely wrong, Mark by Steven Leser on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:43:08 PM
Do we have to go through this meaning of Zionism thing again by Steven Leser on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:39:39 PM
now, let's remember-- there is no ban on words by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:52:06 PM
THOSE WHO CANNOT REMEMBER THE PAST ARE CONDEMNED ... by WML on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:48:22 PM
Nice theory by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:01:36 PM
Be a Joan Walsh by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:48:59 PM
That darned "Iraq Euphemism" by Rrrandy-Steve on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:49:22 PM
If you consider Rob the editor here, which he is... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:17:26 PM
Thanks for mentioning that by Sandy Sand on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:37:01 PM
Good by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:40:42 PM
Occupancy? by Laudyms on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 11:25:13 PM
Not inappropriate... just flagged for thinking twice by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 10:44:35 AM
Why not ?.... by Sandy Sand on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:49:24 PM
hey! by joed on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:59:47 PM
This is a for-real test by Mary Pitt on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:22:58 PM
Mumzee, sweetie by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:37:08 PM
IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, LEAVE? by WML on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:33:46 PM
More like, it is my house, if you dont like my rules by Steven Leser on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:35:51 PM
actually, by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:55:51 PM
okay by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:50:06 PM
Trying to put on YOUR mocassins, Rob ... by ladybroadoak on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:27:14 AM
I never said that. Don't put your issues on me. by Steven Leser on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:10:18 AM
Steven, by ladybroadoak on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 12:18:31 PM
I think you DO need an interpreter... by Steven Leser on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:12:33 PM
And furthermore... by Steven Leser on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:20:03 PM
Virginia, by John R Moffett on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 10:06:03 AM
I am a bit sensitive .. by ladybroadoak on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 12:27:24 PM
Hang in there by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:31:19 PM
Free speech by Sandy Sand on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 11:34:16 AM
seig fried by joed on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 9:45:21 PM
Why thank you for calling me a near immortal by Steven Leser on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 10:04:31 PM
I am out of here by walley on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 10:14:13 PM
which websites? by Rob Kall on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 10:28:50 PM
Good by by walley on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 11:39:13 PM
Wow. You really read me wrong. by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 10:51:30 AM
Walley: Your comment: Good By by TroubledTexan on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 6:17:58 PM
Thanks Rob by WML on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 11:04:30 PM
A Gay example by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:42:28 PM
the evolving hall monitor by Laudyms on Thursday, Sep 6, 2007 at 11:17:29 PM
All hail the wise ruling of Solomon...ah, Rob by Michael Lubin on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:30:42 AM
If you think >I< am wrong regarding the meaning of Zionism by Steven Leser on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:18:45 AM
And Mike, the point is... by Steven Leser on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:23:13 AM
three very different versions by Michael Lubin on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 10:55:33 PM
the meaning of Zionism by Michael Lubin on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 10:40:19 PM
"Copulate with this poo-poo!" by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:46:43 PM
Firstly, Rob... by Pappy on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 2:53:30 AM
Hey, Pappy by Sandy Sand on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 12:04:36 PM
symbols are gone by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 1:52:01 PM
Literally, no, but yes. I did. by Tony Forest on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 3:15:27 PM
Hi Rob by John R Moffett on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 5:19:00 AM
I agree 100% John... by Steven Leser on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:02:03 AM
Hi Steven by John R Moffett on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:06:49 AM
You know to what I think it boils down? by Steven Leser on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 11:11:16 AM
Another comment from the first by Mark Sashine on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 7:37:17 AM
As you said, "Party pooper" by John R Moffett on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:02:02 AM
John by Mark Sashine on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:21:17 AM
Is your solution by John R Moffett on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:30:57 AM
See, you already do not have much to say to me:) by Mark Sashine on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 8:51:08 AM
Then we agree by John R Moffett on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 9:01:15 AM
anger management by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 10:58:20 AM
Rob by pratliff94 on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 9:38:59 AM
"Occupancy"? Are you kidding??!! It's an OCCUPATION. by SteveGinIL on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 11:24:50 AM
Steve, by John R Moffett on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 2:37:14 PM
Bummer, dude... by Pappy on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 3:06:32 PM
deep sixing the comment marking by Rob Kall on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 3:23:29 PM
New World Order by ElaineC on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 3:47:56 PM
The only Problem is in your head not Rob's by Andris on Friday, Sep 7, 2007 at 7:40:30 PM