36 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Diary   

The Need to Heed the Dangerous Threats from Iran, Israel and U.S.

Follow Me on Twitter     Message arn specter
October 11, 2009
The Need to Heed the Dangerous Threats from Iran, Israel and U.S.
by Arn Specter, Phila. (Twitter and www.opednews.com )
The following three stories,
1) Iran threatened by U.S. buster bomb
2) Iran warns against attack, boasts nuclear talks success
3)
World 'won't wait indefinitely' on Iran nuclear plans: Clinton
led me to thinking about the dangerous events taking place today
in troubled regions around the world. thus the following.
All of development of bigger and better weapons by the U.S.
Iran and Israelcan only lead to further alienation and danger
for people and nations. Instead of more weapons we need more
diplomacy, to find ways to get along with one another.Yes, that
sounds trite and simplistic but gets to the core of the problems - and the
solutions, if there is cooperation and a willingness to work towards
finding ways for nonviolent and peaceful means to calm things down now
and in the years ahead.
More diplomacy means more communication between those in power
and their associates, along with those from other nations and International
Agencies working on ways to foster positive, progressive changes among
nations and in regions; such as the Middle East. The United Nations
Security Council might call such a meeting in the near future citing these
current weapons developments as cause for grave concern to the region
and the international community. Threats and counter-threats need to be
challenged in open forums for discussions and agreement making to stem
the tide of potential violence that could harm millions of people.
Let us advocate then for diplomacy efforts by the United Nations, the
European Union, the Arab League, the U.S., Iran and Israel and other
interested nations and organizations before things deteriorate further.
This current name calling and threatening is childlike but extremely
dangerous and needs to be calmed by discussions with openmindedness
by those involved in the meetings.
At the same time the people and legislative bodies of our nations need
to consider carefully the potential harm of more weapons developed
versus the possible long-term benefits from nonviolent, diplomatic actions
which could engender peace and security for all concerned. Disarmament
would greatly help the cause for peace. Those in positions of responsibility
in government need to turn away from influence from military contractors
and deny funding for more weapons development. People and NGO's
(non-governmental agencies) need to lobby those in legislatures to do just
that while supporting peacemaking agendas.
As militarization escalates worldwide the world community is challenged
to raise awareness and take action to stem this tide of arming for defense
and national and regional security. These weapons and military minded
perspectives are simply too dangerous now to be left to control and
dominate national and regional developments. While we are having talks
to reduce nuclear weapons and all that goes along with keeping things under
control in that sphere we also need talks about developments of conventional weapons and the vast sales and purchases of them worldwide.
Corporate profits before the security needs of people is reprehensible
yet has been the way of doing business for decades now. Politicians
listen to the corporate lobbyists, accept their contributions, and vote for more
appropriations for militarization and continuing the wars. These shameful
acts of greed and self-serving interests need to be challenged much more
along with some conscious raising about the benefits of a world at peace
rather than at war. Corporations need to be held accountable as well as
politicians who act in their favor instead of listening to the pleas of their
constituents, and those hurt, maimed and killed by the may wars we've
engaged in over the years.
Too the U.S. needs to join with the Internationals Community who have
worked hard over the years developing treaties which levy various sanctions
on weapons development, sales and use; such as the Mine Ban Treaty,
the Cluster Munitions Ban Treaty and the Arms Trade Treaty. These and any
other treaties that curtail violent means in war need to be appreciated by those
people in the U.S. Administration and Congress who have the power and responsibility to join forces with so many other nations who have taken the
progressive steps foward and decided against further war making weapons.
Let us then join forces and use our hearts, minds and spirits to advocate
positive developments in world and foreign affairs, to cast some light
upon the darkness of man's consciousness, to help lift us up so that we
can respect and appreciate peoples of all nations and their inherent rights
to peace and security in this troubled world. Let us take away the power
and influence of the war makers and give strength to the progressives and
peacemakers in this country and in other nations around the world. Onward
and upwards for progress in the Light.
Arn Specter, Phila. (Twitter and www.opednews.com )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iran threatened by U.S. buster bomb

World 'won't wait indefinitely' on Iran nuclear plans: Clinton
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned Iran Sunday that the international community "will not wait indefinitely" for the Islamic republic to meet its obligations on its disputed nuclear programme. "The international community will not wait indefinitely for evidence that Iran is prepared to live up to its international obligations," Clinton said after talks in London with British Foreign Secretary David Miliband. Clinton said the six-party talks on Iran's nuclear programme in Geneva on October 1 were a "constructive beginning" but she said they "must be followed by action". "Words are not enough," she added. Western powers suspect Iran's nuclear programme is aimed at making atomic weapons, a charge strongly denied by Tehran. Global powers were outraged after Iran, just days ahead of the Geneva talks, revealed to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that it was building a second uranium enrichment plant near the holy city of Qom. The next stage in the talks comes on October 19, when officials from Iran, the United States, Russia, France and the IAEA are to meet in Vienna to work out the deals under which Tehran has said it is ready to buy 20 percent pure uranium from abroad. (AFP Report)
by Staff Writers
Tehran (UPI) Oct 8, 2009
The Pentagon has acknowledged that it is speeding up plans to deploy a massive bomb capable of knocking out deeply buried enemy facilities.

The giant "bunker buster" is believed to add fighting power to the U.S. arsenal against Iran's nuclear program, defense experts argue.

U.S. officials, however, have refused to confirm the connection.

The 30,000-pound massive ordnance penetrator is capable of penetrating up to 60 meters of earth, or a thick layer of concrete, before exploding. It weighs more than 13 metric tons, allowing just one such bunker buster to be carried by U.S. bomber aircraft.

"It is under development right now and should be deployable in the coming months," press secretary Geoff Morrell was quoted saying in a report by Defense News.

U.S. Pentagon officials said they had asked Congress in August to redirect $52 million in funding to the project in order to speed up production of the massive bomb.

After winning congressional approval, the Pentagon said this week that it had awarded Boeing's McDonnell Douglas a $51.9 million contract to "enable B-2 aircraft" to carry the bomb.

"The threats have been developing over the years," a Pentagon spokesman was quoted saying to U.S. media. "There are, without getting into any intelligence, there are countries that have used technologies to go further underground and to take those facilities and make them hardened. This is not a new phenomenon, but it is a growing one."

He said the first of the bombs would be ready by the middle of 2010.

While the United States possess similar bombs in its arsenal, the "bunker buster" is said to take that capability of penetrating hardened facilities to new levels.

Pentagon officials refused to clarify whether the bomb's development was in response to Iran's controversial nuclear arms program.

Last month Defense Secretary Robert Gates said an attack against Iran would only "buy time," delaying Tehran's dispute nuclear program by about three years.

That same month Iran conceded that it had begun building a new uranium enrichment facility near the holy city of Qom. It has since then, however, taken a more conciliatory stance allowing for U.N. inspection of the site.

It is believed that the MOP, manufactured by aerospace giant Boeing, could become the biggest conventional weapon bomb to arm the United States.

earlier related report
Iran warns against attack, boasts nuclear talks success
Iran issued another warning on Friday against any attack on the Islamic republic, while claiming its talks with world powers over its controversial nuclear programme were "a success and a victory."

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's deputy representative to the elite Revolutionary Guards, Mojtaba Zolnour, said Tehran will "blow up the heart" of Israel if attacked by the Jewish state or the United States.

"Even if one American or Zionist missile hits our land, before the dust is settled, Iranian missiles will blow up the heart of Israel," state news agency IRNA quoted Zolnour as saying.

Iranian officials have repeatedly said Tehran would carry out severe reprisals if Israel or the United States attacked the country.

The United States and its regional ally Israel have never ruled out a military option to stop Tehran's nuclear drive, which the West says is aimed at making nuclear weapons while Iran says it is solely for peaceful ends.

After the 1979 Islamic revolution, Tehran withdrew its recognition of Israel.

The Jewish state considers the Islamic republic to be its arch-enemy after repeated statements by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that the Holocaust was a "myth" and that Israel is doomed to be "wiped off the map."

Another Khamenei appointee and one of Tehran's Friday prayer leaders, Ahmad Khatami, also issued a stern warning to Iran's enemies, without naming any.

"As our leader has said, our enemies are pursuing an Iranophobia scenario against us, and they are saying Iran is against world peace. But the world has understood that what they say is a lie," Khatami told worshippers in a sermon broadcast live on state-run radio.

"The enemy should know that if they want to hurt Iran they will receive such a slap that they will not be able to stand up," he added amid the habitual chants of "death to American and death to Israel."

Last month, Iran disclosed that it was building a second uranium enrichment plant, angering world powers and drawing an accusation from UN atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei that having kept the work secret was on the "wrong side of the law."

Tensions increased only days later, and just days before crucial talks in Geneva with world powers over Tehran's controversial nuclear programme, when Tehran tested several short- and medium-range missiles.

Khatami labelled those talks a "success and victory."

"The Geneva talks were a success and a victory for the Islamic republic system (since) even the Zionist and world arrogances' media confirmed this," he said.

"We owe this success to the wise guidance of the supreme leader and the ninth and tenth governments following his guidance," he added in reference to Ahmadinejad's previous and current administrations.

Iranian officials have maintained that they had the upper hand in the negotiations, with Ahmadinejad on Wednesday calling them a "step forward."

Western governments have been seeking reassurances that Iran's nuclear programme is entirely peaceful, and Iran agreed to open the newly disclosed enrichment plant to UN inspection.

Soon after the talks, ElBaradei visited Tehran to work out the modalities of the inspection, which is due to take place on October 25.

Iran also offered to send low-enriched uranium abroad so that it could be enriched to higher levels by a third party, and is to meet with France, Russia and the United States in Vienna on October 19 to work out the modalities.

Uranium enrichment lies at the heart of Western concerns about the Iranian nuclear programme. The sensitive process can produce fuel for civilian nuclear reactors or, in highly extended form, the fissile core of an atomic bomb.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------













Rate It | View Ratings

arn specter Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Progress/Spiritual male, 63, lives in Phila. Retired and active on progresive issues; Reducing Military Spending, Nuclear Nonproliferation, Impeachment, Stoping the War , Disarmament, Single-Payer health care, Animal Welfare, Communities Advocate, (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend