Tags for This Article:

Iraq (5289)  Government (3432)  Military (3141)  People (2853)  Iran (2505)  Truth (1660)  Money (1159)  International (1061)  Terrorism (1029)  Health (895)  Health (823)  Wars (754)  Energy (713)  Afghanistan (685)  Poverty (648)  Weapons (618)  Russia (611)  Science (467)  Education (449)  Taxes (363)  Questions (341)  Bankruptcy (276)  Drugs (264)  China (248)  Injustice (220)  Commonsense (63) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
October 21, 2007 at 23:57:54

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined on 10/21/07:
"Commonsense" and Our Two Never-Ending Wars

by Timothy V. Gatto     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

Let’s say that your family spent 50% of your income on mortgage or rent. Would a financial advisor tell you that your spending was way out of line? If 50% of your take home pay was for any one thing, it wouldn’t take long for you to end up in financial trouble now, would it? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out, all it takes is a little common sense.

Now, if I told you that almost 50% of the Unites States tax receipts went to military spending, would you think me a liar? Well I would be, because it’s more than 50%. Ask yourself why, when we have a friendly nation to our north and a friendly nation to our south and an ocean to our east and one to the west, and a missile system and an Air force that could knock out an invading navy without a problem, then why are we spending half of our budget on military expenditures?

Would it upset you to know that China, the #2 country for military expenditures only spends 6% of its budget on the military? Russia, #3, is the same. Iran, the big boogie man of the Middle East that we are so worried about according to Dick Cheney, is #27 with a whopping $4.9 Billion Dollar budget with 1% of their budget spent on the military. It’s estimated that the United States will spend 52% of its budget, and 481.4 Billion dollars on defense this year, and that’s not counting the money for the war in Iraq which so far we have spent $130 Billion Dollars on this year and another $190 Billion that the President has requested. Isn’t this a little bit of overkill?

The United States spends a little over 6% of its budget for education, and 5.6% for health. I guess if you don’t care about health and education, than the figures shouldn’t leave you breathless. I figure that if the US cut its military budget by 1/2 to where we only spent about $250 Billion dollars, we could increase the health and education budgets by 100% and still have a little over $200 Billion dollars left over.

Why are we spending so much on defense? Remember, these figures are not including the war in Iraq. Don’t you believe that the Military Industrial Complex is a part of this? Why was everyone so surprised when former Senator Mike Gravel brought the MIC up in the first debate in South Carolina? The Democratic Candidates are quite aware of how much we spend on defense. The fact is that the United States spends 48% of the world’s total military spending. What would happen to Northrop-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon and all of the other defense contractors if we cut our budget by 50%? I guess they would have to look for other things to build.

As long as we spend half the nation’s wealth on the military, we are going to be a belligerent power in the world. When we spend 100 times more than Iran spends, I guess it’s safe to say we can push them around with impunity. Sadly, this is exactly what we are doing. The sad truth is that with all the publicity about Global Warming, we only spend 19% of our budget on science, energy and the environment. Who cares if the planet dies as long as we are the winner militarily?

I know reading the figures on what we spend isn’t glamorous and exciting, but when you look at what we are spending compared to the rest of the world you have to ask yourself two important questions. The first question is the one that Mike Gravel asked the other Democratic Candidates; “Who are you afraid of?” The second question is that if we are spending 48% of the entire world spending on the military, where is the payoff? Most of this money goes to weapons systems that are obsolete after a short time, so are we going to keep this same insane rate of spending up indefinitely? How can we possibly do this? So far, we have kept this up since the beginning of World War II.

Another question you must ask yourself is how long will this “Global War on Terror” go on? Has the world ever been terror free? Are we going down the same road as the War on Drugs? Will the world ever be drug-free?Every time you kill a terrorist, another will take his or her place. The people of Afghanistan are growing opium poppies right under our nose and we can’t even stop that. How the hell are we to eliminate terror from the world? You can’t, it’s just not possible. This war, along with the attacks on our liberties, will go on forever. There is absolutely no difference in the War on Drugs and the War on Terror. Both so-called wars are self-perpetuating and will last two lifetimes, if not forever. Every time you kill or imprison a drug-dealer, there will be someone to take their place. Eliminate the causes of terrorism, the poverty, the injustice and the fanatics that these things foster, and you will eliminate a great deal of terrorism. Bomb the hell out of these people and run them out of their homes and invade their nations, and all you do is foster more terrorism.

The same goes for the drug war. Keep drugs illegal and you create criminals. God forbid you legalize drugs, regulate and tax them and thereby keep it out of the hands of the street vendors and the international drug-runners and you can use the money from the taxes for education and rehabilitation. We didn’t create a nation of alcoholics when we stopped prohibition. The same people will become drug addicts whether it is legal or not. This is another never-ending war with no chance of victory.

Someday, this country will understand how our so-called “leaders”, and I use the term loosely, are taking us for a long expensive ride to bankruptcy. Like I said in the beginning of this piece, if this were a family budget we were talking about, instead of a national budget, the head of this family would be declared incompetent. Meanwhile, we take what our government tells us and don’t even question why we spend half our budget for the military. This, my friends, is our burden to share. Until we tell our government that we have had enough, they will spend us into bankruptcy with their never ending wars. The choice is yours and mine to make. Isn’t it time we made it?

This is how I see it.

*All figues taken from Globalissues.org 

 

http://liberalpro.blogspot.com

Tim was banned from the site for posting private email from the publisher to him on his blog, and then attacking the publisher and the site in emails and articles. OEN has no responsibility to publish articles from people who attack the site. Tim's accusations that he was banned for his political positions are untrue. Check his articles. He repetitively wrote about and had published exactly the things he claimed he was banned for doing.
Former Chairman of the Liberal Party of America, Tim is a retired Army Sergeant. He currently lives in South Carolina. A regular contributor to OpEdNews, he is the author of Kimchee Kronicles and is currently at work on a new novel.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments

I'm 23 years of age. I recently graduated with a BA in Media Studies. I like to question everything, especially government.
Tanvir T.I'm 23 years of age. I recently graduated with a BA in Media Studies. I like to question everything, especially government.

U.S vs Estonia

Over 50 percent is a high amount, although can you say what they are doing is wrong. The U.S constitution allows the government to spend on our military. It says nothing about Education or Healthcare, no one is complaining. In Estonia they have a flat tax and a good health care system which isn't nationalized. I just saw a website about Estonia's Singing Revolution – http://singingrevolution.com; this is quite inspirational.

by Tanvir T. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 1:13:07 PM
 


Nothing to say
gormlyNothing to say

losing credibility

This is why liberals lose credibility.

"almost 50% of the Unites States tax receipts went to military spending" is a LIE.

 

You mean GPD?
Discretionary?
Individual Tax Revenue, Business tax Revenue? All Revenue? 
Income from Grandma Jones?

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/index.php

many.. many more links with accurate government spending.

Did you honestly believe no one would call you on this inflated guess?

figures straight before you attempt to make coherant posting.  YOU are part of the reason this country cannot get its crap together.

 

Don't try to weasle out of this outright LIE by convoluting figures.. use the TRUTH to spread your message.

 

 

 

by gormly (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 1:52:21 PM
 


N/A
drakaanN/A

confused...

The FY 2007 numbers for total spending are about 2.7 trillion...where does the over 50% figure come from?

 

Not saying it's wrong as a figure, but that'd mean that we're spending 213% of total tax revenue (based on 2.7 trillion spending and 644 billion on defense)...defense spending seems (including additional spending over the 644 billion) to be around 18-20% higher than that for pensions and healthcare...I agree that 50% spending in one area is bad, but I'm at a loss when it cones to reconciling the numbers.

 Help me understand!

by drakaan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 3:07:52 PM
 


Tim was banned from the site for posting private email from the publisher to him on his blog, and then attacking the publisher and the site in emails and articles. OEN has no responsibility to publish articles from people who attack the site.

Tim's accusations that he was banned for his political positions are untrue. Check his articles. He repetitively wrote about and had published exactly the things he claimed he was banned for doing.

Former Chairman of the Liberal ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Timothy V. GattoTim was banned from the site for posting private email from the publisher to him on his blog, and then attacking the publisher and the site in emails and articles. OEN has no responsibility to publish articles from people who attack the site.

Tim's accusations that he was banned for his political positions are untrue. Check his articles. He repetitively wrote about and had published exactly the things he claimed he was banned for doing.

Former Chairman of the Liberal ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Check my sources

Check out Globalissues.org, they have made a tidy pie chart and graph for defense, and all other spending. You can go to my blog at www.liberalpro.blogspot.com and click on the defense spending button on the right that weill take you right there. Notice that defense spending does NOT include the cost of the war in Iraq. Figure that we are in the RED so the fiscal figures won't jive because we are borrowing heavily, especially from China.

by Timothy V. Gatto (348 articles, 177 quicklinks, 38 diaries, 574 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 3:40:58 PM
 


.
chris mckenzie.

missed a few things

Hey, I see you found the budget problem, that is good.  But here are some questions to ask:

This chart:  http://graphics.cursor.org/esimage4.jpg

It appears that the Taliban had eliminated Opium, and thus helped the war
on drugs - at about the same time that we kicked them out.  Now we claim
that it's the taliban in the desert growing opium ... What is this inconsistency? 
Could resuming the Opium trade have been a goal of the invasion?

 

This chart:  www.wtrg.com/oil_graphs/oilprice1947.gif

The most cynical people will claim that we went to Iraq for *cheap* oil prices.  However, why would you kick a competitor out of an open market to get greater control over supply?  Would this be so you can offer more competitive prices?  I thought
this was a monopoly tactic so that you could raise prices.

As you can see, the oil price shot up after 9.11, but then, magically started to decrease simultaneously
with a clamor to go to war with Iran. Oil companies have record profits and most people look and scratch their head.  It's basic capitalism
at work here.  One of the objectives of Middle East hegemony is to create oil supply monopolies so
that american corps can price fix and make profit.
Your tax dollars at work to support someone who is trying to screw you.

 

Here is another:  www.firstgoldcorp.com/img/chart_us_dollar.gif

As you can see the US dollar started losing value shortly after 9.11 - when
the talk of the North American Union was coming in.  This is the same time
when there were record profits from selling short on the dollar.  As far as your question as to where the money for the war comes from --- 

well, it's just printed and spent --- it comes from the same place as all other money, a printing press controlled by some private banks.  Devaluing currency in order to cover one's ass is a time honored tradition that goes back as far as Fiat currency and William Jennings Bryant talked excessively about it in 1896.

 Anyway, hope this clears up any confusion.

by chris mckenzie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 3:21:31 PM
 


Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Barbara PetersonBarbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to college online to obtain a Bachelor's degree in Business, and graduated with honors.

The most valuable thing she received from her time with UOP was a realization that her life's passion is writing. Now her business degree sits in her d...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Tax Dollars


NPP INCOME TAX CHART
 
Enter the amount of federal income tax you paid during 2006 and see how the government spent the money.
Note: Totals may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
 
$  1.00



Tax Chart

Of the $1.00 you paid in taxes:
$0.27 goes to the military
$0.19 goes to pay the interest on the debt
$0.21 go es to health care
$0.06 goes to income security
$0.05 goes to education
$0.03 goes to benefits for veterans
$0.03 goes to nutrition spending
$0.02 goes to housing
$0.02 goes to environmental protection
$0.00 goes to job training
$0.12 goes to all other expenses

Source: Breakdown of income taxes is based on Budget of the United States Government
View sources and methodology,

by Barbara Peterson (46 articles, 80 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 416 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 3:25:31 PM
 


Tim was banned from the site for posting private email from the publisher to him on his blog, and then attacking the publisher and the site in emails and articles. OEN has no responsibility to publish articles from people who attack the site.

Tim's accusations that he was banned for his political positions are untrue. Check his articles. He repetitively wrote about and had published exactly the things he claimed he was banned for doing.

Former Chairman of the Liberal ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Timothy V. GattoTim was banned from the site for posting private email from the publisher to him on his blog, and then attacking the publisher and the site in emails and articles. OEN has no responsibility to publish articles from people who attack the site.

Tim's accusations that he was banned for his political positions are untrue. Check his articles. He repetitively wrote about and had published exactly the things he claimed he was banned for doing.

Former Chairman of the Liberal ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

This is the information from Globalissues.org

 


Current Military Spending571.628%
Cost of Past Wars263.513%
Total military percent 41%
Health Research & Services393.519%
Responses to Poverty241.012%
Interest on Non-Military Share of Federal Debt211.510%
General Government84.64%
Community & Economic Development112.15%
Social Programs97.75%
Science, Energy, & Environment50.82%
Non-Military International Programs29.81%
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp

If you bring the money in that we spend on Iraq, it brings us OVER 50%

by Timothy V. Gatto (348 articles, 177 quicklinks, 38 diaries, 574 comments) on Monday, October 22, 2007 at 4:39:20 PM
 

 

10 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

For the GOP, the Economic Meltdown May Have Happened Just a Wee Bit Early by Bernard Weiner

Go To Top 50 Most Popular