Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

A Modest Propsal for Iraq

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (26 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

People might not want to hear this, but there is no clear solution to what this administration has brought to us in Iraq. A sudden pullout would in fact leave many Iraqi civilians in harm’s way in an all out carnage of sectarian violence. This is unavoidable; we are seeing this while our troops are still there. Nothing except committing more troops, which at this point is impossible will stop this carnage.

Iran on the other hand, will have an unparalleled opportunity to become the dominant power in the Middle East by exploiting the weakness of the Iraqi central government. This is a fact friend, not fiction. As a student of history I can just about guarantee that Iran will be the de facto ruler of Iraq. They had a six year war with Iraq and had over a million casualties. The United States backed that war and Iran will not forget. This poses a serious problem for The United States.

To let Iran have hegemony over the Middle East would be anathema to The United States. They would in fact, now threaten Saudi Arabia and America’s oil supplies. If we were to go to war to defend Saudi Arabia, that would indeed be a war for oil. Whether or not we would defend Saudi Arabia with the current feelings in the US would be hard to predict. Would we go to war with Iran over Saudi Arabia? Could we if we pulled all our troops from the Middle East?

This is a conundrum. Damned if we do, and damned if we don’t. This brings us to a modest proposal on the Middle East that could ensure Iran would never complete its hegemony over Iraq. It would guarantee a safe haven in the west for Sunni Muslims and guarantee a free state for the Kurds in the north of Iraq that are for the most part, operating as an independent state now.

My proposal is to re-align our forces. We must cut the number of troops in Iraq by half. Move our bases into Northern Iraq (Kurdistan), take the city of Kirkut and concentrate on that city and bring it under control and realign it with Kurdistan. Kurdistan would at this time elect to stay a part of Iraq as an autonomous state, or it could declare its independence. With a strong American presence in Kurdestan, Turkey would not have to worry about Kurds using Kurdistan as a base to launch attacks against Turkey. This would give the Kurds their homeland, while also keeping a large US presence in the area.

Keeping a large military presence in a friendly country that would actually welcome us is a large strategic advantage. Basing troops in Kuwait, with their ports on the Gulf would also give us added military strength in the area and give the US the capability to keep the Gulf open.


I see this a win-win situation. This proposal would give America a steadfast friend in the region, one that has enormous oil reserves. It would also guarantee a Kurdish homeland, and give America a great strategic base to operate from. It would also be a place that should we need to strike anywhere in Iraq, we could launch military operations from if Kurdistan if it was necessary to protect human life in Iraq. It would also give Iran pause in the event they wanted to attack Saudi Arabia. This is the way I see it.

 

http://liberalpro.blogspot.com

Former Chairman of the Liberal Party of America, Tim is a retired Army Sergeant. He currently lives in South Carolina. A regular contributor to OpEdNews, he is the author of Kimchee Days or Stoned Cold Warriors and is currently at work on a new (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Why does the US have any right whatsoever to try to control by Richard Mynick on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 9:31:53 AM
Understand Something by Timothy V. Gatto on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:44:43 AM
But the whole model of the US unilaterally trying to control by Richard Mynick on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:56:23 PM
Why? by Bill Cain on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 5:42:33 PM
You don't see this correctly.. by Blue Pilgrim on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:37:37 AM
It Was Only A Proposal by Timothy V. Gatto on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 2:09:33 PM
selling arms to saudi's by mike on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 4:10:54 PM
It's not a bad thing you brought it up; by Blue Pilgrim on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 5:14:59 PM
There is no perfect answer. by Timothy V. Gatto on Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 9:23:43 PM
Unfortuntely, the Iraqi civilians are hosed in any case by rapfinance on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 4:45:28 AM
In the first place by ardee D. on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 7:03:09 AM
Oh Ardee by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:45:15 AM
Dangerous ground, Tim..... by ardee D. on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 2:20:22 PM
You Are Completly Right by Timothy V. Gatto on Sunday, Sep 2, 2007 at 4:19:14 PM