Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (50 comments)

The History Channel's 9/11 Documetary, and Sen. Leahy's Subpoena

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (26 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

I watched The History Channels documentary about the 9/11 Truth Movement last night, and I was surprised that the information that the History Channel used to illustrate the thinking of the movement was basically correct. I also saw that they used the type of technique that always gave the last word to the people debunking the “myths” of 9/11. I have to admit that the History Channel did a good job of debunking many myths about 9/11 but failed to answer my own questions.

When I was in the Army from 1968 to 1975, I worked on an air defense system that was part of NORAD, the Nike-Hercules air defense system (the precursor of the Patriot system used now). The system incorporated a system call IFF (Identification Friend or Foe). This system sent out a signal to every plane flying, and if a plane had a transponder working, once it received that radar signal from the ground, it would reply with a signal of it’s own. This would mean that there would be a circle around the plane’s blip on the radar-scope. If the plane had no transponder on, or if it was an enemy plane with no transponder with the secret code that was changed from time to time, then the target on the radar would have only a half circle around it. The bottom of the circle which was our half circle that we sent to the plane, but with no top half of the circle which would be completed by the suspect plane’s transponder

The Patriot system has essentially the same system. The FAA has the same transponders. The History Channel showed 4500 planes in the air all-over the country. Listen, one acquisition-type radar in a given area will only have at most a hundred planes on it. If they turned their IFF on, or used the Patriot system that’s based around Washington DC, it would have been child’s play to find those missing planes. If they didn’t do that, then they were criminally remiss. If they don’t have IFF in the FAA systems then they also are criminally remiss. They should have IFF systems in FAA systems for a hijacking event in any case.

Also, why is it only now that anyone has tried to answer the myriad questions that have arisen since the tragedy of 9/11? You know that the History Channel had to have had the cooperation of the Federal Government to ask the questions that they did and show the equipment that they did. Why didn’t they state their case earlier?

Either way, we know that this will not close the case on 9/11, it will only fuel the debate. I believe in facts, not hysteria, the documentary in this case did in fact answer many questions I had. However it also didn’t answer the questions I raised above. Maybe 9/11 wasn’t an “inside job” as many claim at least not the actual event. However the money trail from the Pakistani ISI to the 9/11 hijackers is not clear. Why was General Ahmed in Washington from September 4-13, 2001, and why did he wire $100,000 to Muhammad Atta?

The most insidious thing that happened through all of this is defiantly the Federal Government’s fault. They should have explained everything long before now. The incidents that led to this 9/11 Truth Movement were perpetrated by our own government that seems to have declared war on the rights of the American People in the wake of this terrible tragedy. So many of our rights that are written in The Constitution and The Bill of Rights, even the Magna Carte have been trashed. Is it any small wonder that the American people don’t trust their own government anymore? They lied their way into a war in Iraq, what’s the difference between lying about an incident where 3,000 American were killed and this War where Hundreds of thousands of Americans and Iraqi’s have been killed? It’s not such a leap of the imagination to believe that 9/11 was part of the total picture, and I don’t call anyone that suspected it a “whack-job” or a “basement conspiracy-nut that has a connection to the Internet”. I believe that even if they are wrong, they are well-intentioned patriotic Americans that just want clear answers that up until last night, they were not getting.


I’m not taking sides. I want my questions answered though. I also am more concerned with this new unlimited power that the government has taken from the people than I am concerned about the specifics of 9/11. Maybe someday we will all know the truth, every detail, or maybe not. We still wonder how Lee Harvey Oswald managed to do the damage he did with one well-placed shot in Dallas in 1963. We still have people on both sides saying that it was a physical impossibility, and people saying that yes, it could have happened. Unless someone gives a deathbed confession, or other evidence turns up, we will never know. Just as we will never know who sink the Maine, or who killed MLK or conspired with the man charged.

We should concentrate on getting our rights returned to us. It wasn’t the American people that were responsible for 9/11. Senator Leahy today called for Cheney to release documents on the wiretaps that the government asked for or to be held in contempt of Congress.http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/20/cheney-leahy-subpoena/ That is the way it should be. No one is above the law. Not Bush, not Cheney. If Congress wants to exercise their oversight role, that is part of their job. I only hope that they don’t back down again. That’s the way I see it.

 

http://liberalpro.blogspot.com

Former Chairman of the Liberal Party of America, Tim is a retired Army Sergeant. He currently lives in South Carolina. A regular contributor to OpEdNews, he is the author of Kimchee Days or Stoned Cold Warriors and is currently at work on a new (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
50 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

curious by richard on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:57:29 AM
Webster G. Tarpley, who was part of the film, wrote this... by joyce on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:00:00 AM
No Timothy, they did not debunk anything. by MikeZimmer on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:13:32 AM
Why Was The History Channel Able to Debunk the 911 Theories? by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:25:58 AM
Oh, and this is an interesting by richard on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:30:14 AM
I'm not a Physicist by Timothy V. Gatto on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:39:23 AM
a better question is.... by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:49:46 AM
Smirking Chimp does a pretty good job as a left gatekeeper by MikeZimmer on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:26:52 PM
Unanswered Questions by william eldridge on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:41:57 AM
Did you read my article by Timothy V. Gatto on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:53:13 AM
Don't you mean the Hearst-ory channel? by Sherry Mann on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:15:21 PM
If "The People" Want Their Rights Restored by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:23:42 PM
The People by Bill Cain on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 1:04:43 PM
Re: "If "The People" Want Their Rights Restored" by Munich on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 1:10:00 PM
Living in a Matrix by Bill Cain on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 3:46:08 PM
The same here. by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 1:06:40 PM
The same here by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 4:54:15 PM
We know the truth about 911 by Munich on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:23:44 PM
building 7 by JAMES MCGHEE on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 1:21:23 PM
The show was a not-so-clever propaganda piece by Co6aka on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 1:55:58 PM
Well said by MikeZimmer on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:21:06 PM
9/11, the ultimate question by Lorring II on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 2:17:26 PM
What if what you say, is what wasn't that what was. WHA' ?? by meremark on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 3:10:16 PM
This Why I Write by Timothy V. Gatto on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 3:49:24 PM
That was a nice thing to say. I appreciate it. by meremark on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 4:29:11 PM
Yet more bunk by Gary Boutell on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 4:17:20 PM
This is a War for Our Minds by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 5:17:38 PM
Re: The History Channel's 9/11 Documetary by Munich on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 6:06:50 PM
search this by J. Vorhees on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 8:23:24 PM
Paul Watson's Reply-Well Worth Reading by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 8:53:55 PM
Regarding the "Molten Steel" by CB Brooklyn on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:04:18 PM
Molten Steel by Munich on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:16:17 PM
I hope you aren't neglecting by Blue Pilgrim on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:33:39 AM
Paul Watson's reply by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 10:57:28 AM
Molten Steel Was Indeed Found by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:11:16 PM
Regarding Sen. Leahy by Munich on Tuesday, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:26:23 PM
MOLTEN STEEL by rhalfhill on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 1:26:48 AM
NO MOLTEN STEEL by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:51:42 PM
NO, the Molten Metal Would Not Have Exploded by Mac McKinney on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 9:40:39 PM
The Rubble Was NOT "Many Stories Deep" by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:58:56 PM
History Channel's 9/11 by Swami Bogananda on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 4:42:33 AM
It's Funny by "Hoss" David P. on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 8:20:41 AM
No You Don't by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 9:41:21 AM
Truth by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 11:10:14 AM
In The Case of 9/11 by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:42:19 PM
In the case of 9-11 by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 5:05:14 PM
There Was **No** Molten Metal at Ground Zero by CB Brooklyn on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:42:57 PM
The 45 degree angles? by "Hoss" David P. on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 2:24:23 PM
Da Nile is Not a River in Egypt by Mac McKinney on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 9:23:24 PM
To put the icing on the propaganda cake... by Co6aka on Wednesday, Aug 22, 2007 at 8:11:44 PM