Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Now Who is Moral?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (56 fans)

The current furor over Mark Foley and the Conservative Republicans jumping on the "homosexual rights" bandwagon, with Rush Lindbaugh and other right wing pundits claiming that it is the liberals that are using sexual preferences in a "baiting" scheme, I can't help but look back on the Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton scandal and wonder what they believe they are proving. Is this the same Republican Party that was shoving "moral values" down the American people's throats? Is this the same political party that claimed that the President, because he was indiscreet with a legal age White House intern, and lied about it to a special investigator that really had no place asking him such a personal question publically in the first place, actually defending a colleague, Dennis Hastert, because he covered up for a pedophile? When do we as a people finally wake up and see what this GOP is made of?

When is it a concern of the people? I believe that The Speaker of The House, third in line for the presidency, especially in this scenario, with the president facing impeachment if a Democratic majority is elected in the House, and a Vice-President who might just be implicated with him in a case of high crimes and misdemeanors, are we as a nation going to give the presidency to a man like Dennis Hastert? In the unlikely, but possible scenario of the President and Vice-President resigning before the new Congress is sworn in, that would bring Dennis Hastert in as President. What a dilemma. Would the Democrats move to impeach him also? Would the American people accept it after the President and The Vice President resigned, would they stand for this new President being impeached because of this Foley Scandal? Would Bush and Cheney do something like that to stop a Democratic Speaker of The House from becoming President if they were both impeached? I could see it happening.

This scenario is highly unlikely. I just brought it up, to show my readers, how far this Republican Party has sunk. This "Moral Majority" is neither Moral, nor the majority it says it is. We can't trust anything they say, we can't trust anything that they do. The timing of breaking this story leaves more questions than answers. The Republicans claim that the Democrats pushed to have this story leaked before the elections, could it really be that the Republicans had it leaked so that it would come out when Congress was not in session because of the elections? Is it because they knew that the story would break soon, so they pushed it up so that they could smooth things over in time to make Mr. Hastert President? Even if it is unlikely, maybe the congress should be reconvened to vote on ousting the current speaker, just to make sure.

This is how The Republican Party operates, on lies and innuendo. Do you see how easily I came up with the same type of hysteria to bring on a distrust of anything the Republicans do, even if the truth might be completely different? It sounds plausible enough, hell, it might even be the truth! If I could work on this bit of propaganda, I could probably have a good percentage of people that read this, paranoid as hell about what the underlying motives are for everything that happens in Washington.

While we are on the subject of morals and political uses of scandals to advance the Republican agenda, why don't we take a good look at what they did to President Clinton. It has come out now, that the Special Prosecutor had absolutely no right to ask The President the questions that he asked him. The nation's interests or security were not at stake. It was not in the same class as "High Crimes and Misdemeanors". The lawyers now are saying that the whole question of President Clinton and Monica Lewinsky could have waited until The President's term of office was over. Why didn't he do that? It was because the Republican's could not stop calling for "full disclosure" from the President.

So why can't we get 'Full Disclosure" from The Speaker of the House"? I believe that since he is in line for the presidency, I would like to know if he broke the law and committed a felony by shielding a fellow Congressman because he was from his own party. If Dennis Hastert becomes President, will he obey the law? Did he obey the law in regard to Mark Foley? This is a perfectly legitimate question. In light of the way President Clinton was made to testify in regard to the Monica Lewinsky scandal, this is much worse. It isn't about whether Dennis Hastert is a liar, but wether he BROKE THE LAW. If President Clinton had to testify about adultery, Rep. Hastert should be compelled to testify about shielding a pedophile. The Christian Right should be screaming for the same disclosure that they demanded from Clinton. The Republicans should not be able to have it both ways. Morality should not be determined by which party you are registered with. If Rep. Hastert cannot be compelled to testify if he broke the law or not, then it only makes sense they should pardon President Clinton.

Former Chairman of the Liberal Party of America, Tim is a retired Army Sergeant. He currently lives in South Carolina. A regular contributor to OpEdNews, he is the author of Kimchee Days (or Stoned Cold Warriors). Tim's political book, "From (more...)
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

S 1867: Killing The Bill of Rights and Declaring War on Americans

Arranging the Deck Chairs While Death Comes from Japan

Interview with Finian Cunningham: Bahrain and the U.S. Role

America Does not have a Functioning Democracy - President Jimmy Carter-- Yet MSM Keeps Serving Up Distractions

The Fix is In. The Revolution is Coming.

Prime-time Politics for the Masses


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I've always been of the opinion that ANY man caugh... by Pat Herrick on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 11:12:26 AM
If you want to talk about morality inside the Repu... by Wyatte Stier on Monday, Oct 9, 2006 at 4:11:44 PM
Seems like this article is nothing but lies and in... by sbaker on Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 9:32:28 PM
The Supreme Court made the Ruling on Clinton with ... by sbaker on Tuesday, Oct 10, 2006 at 9:52:44 PM