Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

Rebuttals to Reasons NOT to Impeach

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (281 fans)

updated Jan 27, 2008

Much has been written about WHY to impeach. But even among people who believe Bush and Cheney lied or intentionally misled the congress about WMDs and reasons to go to war, even among people people who believe that Bush and Cheney have treasonously violated laws and betrayed the constitution, some people don’t believe there should be impeachment proceedings.  I’ve listed, below, some of the  most common objections to impeachment, with rebuttals to them.

It is important to keep in mind that impeachment is a constitutional tool, primarily to be used, in the early stages for hearings and investigations. Most in congress seem to think of impeachment focusing on the Senate impeachment trial, ignoring history.

Keep in mind that Richard Nixon never ended up being tried by the Senate. After hearings exposed the levels of lawbreaking and corruption, a group of Senate Republicans took “the walk” to the White House to tell Nixon he had to go, that if he didn’t, they were ready to remove him. Of course, that was after Agnew had been pushed to resign, with hearings that disclosed enough to show how dirty he was.

This is the scenario that will unfold for the Bush/Cheney administration. Judiciary committee impeachment hearings will disclose enough about Cheney so he will resign. Then hearings on Bush will reveal enough dirt so the GOP leaders will cut their losses at some point, when supporting Dubya no longer seems at all viable, when the GOP brand will be close to going down the toilet, and they’ll take “the walk” to visit George to tell him he has to quit or they will side with the Dems and remove him.

Bottom line-- impeachment will never reach the Senate.

But for these things to happen, Nancy Pelosi has to put impeachment back on the table and let John Conyers, head of the house judiciary committee, do the job he’s ready to do—start impeachment investigations of Cheney and Bush. It worked to get rid of Gonzales. It will work for Cheney, then Bush too.

Here are some common arguments against impeachment, with their rebuttals. Frankly, if the Dems fail to impeach, and they fail to end the war, and they let Bush’s disastrous economic policies and his massive war spending continue, the USA will be in even worst trouble than the horrific mortgage/ housing and dollar crash and credit disaster we are already in.

Common Arguments Against Impeachments & Their Rebuttals
1- That will give us Cheney as president.

Well, of course, we have to impeach Cheney first, but we can and should be INVESTIGATING both.  Once Cheney investigations start, the VP will get a note from the Doctor. He’ll try to pull the plug on hearings by resigning with his heart problems as the explanation.

2-Not enough time. Cheney and Bush will be out of office in 12 months. Why bother?

Lots of reasons. They committed crimes. Investigations will turn up more ugly dirt. Investigations will turn up new, fresh witnesses who will roll over and testify against Cheney and Bush. It’s not about timely convenience. It’s about the congress obeying their oath to uphold and defend the constitution—which Bush and Cheney have treasonously violated.  

3- . Bush and Cheney have broken no laws

Bush and his defenders argue that as Commander-in-Chief, Bush and his designate Cheney have not violated any laws.  The counter argument:  The violation of Geneva Convention principles would be a breaking of U. S. law since the United States has signed "a treaty" banning torture and other mistreatment of detainees.  International Treaties become U. S. Law and may not be negated by the President.  Justice Bryer 9 Oct 2007. And just because Bush issues a signing statement—actually, over 1000—doesn’t mean he is right, that he doesn’t have to follow the laws the congress has passed.

4- The Dems will be accused of wasting time.

Former congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman, who was involved in the Nixon impeachment hearings, reports that this is untrue, that the congress was well able to get business done.

Next Page  1  |  2


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
It's time to start holding hearings on impeachment

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Rob Kall is editor-in-chief, publisher and site architect of, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor. He hosts the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, aired in the Metro Philly area on AM 1360, WNJC. Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also published regularly on the

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Rob is, with the first media winner of the Pillar Award for supporting Whistleblowers and the first amendment.

See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here. To learn more about Rob and, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article. For Rob's work in non-political realms mostly before 2000, see his C.V..  and here's an article on the Storycon Summit Meeting he founded and organized for eight years. Press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

Here is a one hour radio interview where Rob was a guest- on Envision This, and here is the transcript. 

To watch Rob having a lively conversation with John Conyers, then Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click hereWatch Rob speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

Follow Rob on Twitter & Facebook. His quotes are here

My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

Interview: McCain Fellow Hanoi Hilton POW & Naval Academy Dorm-mate; Why He Won't Vote For McCain


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
18 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This is a bit like 6., but with more detail.And, g... by Charlie L on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:13:34 AM
Bill Clinton's 60% approval rating should not ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:11:18 AM
everyone should fax this article to their "re... by Better World Order on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:15:50 AM
I've contacted my Rep, who offered one of the abov... by Gustav Wynn on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:59:19 AM
Even before the 2006 Mid-terms I believed that Bus... by William Cormier on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:32:37 AM
' Beware of the clever cowardice. It is worse ... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 12:16:31 PM
It brings to mind the imagery of cockroaches scram... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:15:29 AM
Don’t Make the President a scapegoat for 300... by RichardKane on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 12:19:18 PM
Failing to begin investigations would be telling f... by cluelessfl on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 1:51:55 PM
It goes far betond approval.  It is nothing s... by Southpaw on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 6:42:31 PM
A ham fisted stab put this reply one comment below... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:18:36 AM
Mostly what's been offered is very cursory ans... by Bill Samuel on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 5:12:36 PM
Better than me... by Andris on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 5:37:47 PM
As a non-American and former pro American I recogn... by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 10:37:47 PM
These are largely what Dave put in his  earli... by Andris on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 5:35:00 PM
perhaps a majority, believe as one commentor wrote... by Jim Freeman on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 6:10:06 PM
The Ulster County NY,Legislature passed Resolution... by Ramon Puga on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 6:38:00 PM
Hello folksSince I was the one who wrote an articl... by Kathryn Smith on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:55:48 PM
Let's face it. Impeachment would require congr... by Angelo on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 9:41:14 AM
The invasion of Iraq was the President and the com... by Brett Paatsch on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:55:00 PM
Thanks for giving us a clear, concise list of argu... by Beth Grimes on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 5:00:37 PM