Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (21 comments)

Rebuttals to Reasons NOT to Impeach

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Lynn Woolsey says “impeachment would suck air out of the room and get nothing accomplished”  Sorry, it may be inconvenient, may even not fit with plans to keep the Republicans hanging out to dry, dangling with their corruption, in the wind, until November, but the Dem leaders in a congress have that annoying duty to uphold the constitution.

5- There's no clear proof 

That's what hearings are for.

6. Impeachment will further divide this country. (Barack Obama's stance.) The country is already divided. It can’t get any further divided. Impeachment will unite all the people who want to protect the constitution and democracy.  

7. Not enough people support impeachment 

It’s not a popularity contest. It’s the job of the congress, when faced with crimes and even questions, to investigate, investigate.

Recent polls have reported that more than half the respondents want impeachment hearings for Cheney. Those numbers will climb when testimony begins, just like it did for Gonzales.

8. You can hold Bush and Cheney accountable without impeaching them. (Pelosi's stance)

Cheney and Bush, still free, still in control can still do further horrific damage to America.. Do we want Bush managing the worst economic crisis in generations? And crimes should be punished as the law prescribes., not ignored. If Clinton had prosecuted George Herbert Walker Bush for his involvement in illegal actions, his son would never have appeared on the picture, as a gubernatorial, let alone presidential candidate. He’d be the  failure son of a corrupt politician.

9. Pelosi can’t pursue impeachment  because she’d become president and it would look like she’s shooting for the job.

No she won’t . Bush will appoint a VP replacement who will become president—someone the Dems can tolerate.. The Dems will not allow anyone who might run for office, so Bush must appoint someone who can bring integrity and bring America together. He might even appoint  someone who actually creates something that leaves a positive legacy—a first woman , Latino, African American VP. Possible  VP appointees who might pass muster include; James Baker, John Warner,  or even Colin Powell, Sen. Elizabeth Dole, Condi Rice or Mel Martinez.   

10. Impeachment will not succeed in the senate.

The goal is not to take impeachment to the senate. It is to force Cheney, then Bush to resign, all the while using the power of impeachment hearing subpoenas, which cannot be rejected with claims of Executive privilege, to expose lies, criminality and corruption. Investigations can last until November, if necessary, and they will hurt the right wingers still supporting Bush and Cheney. Gradually, more will see the light, until before impeachment ever goes to a vote, enough senators will take “THE WALK” to the Whitehouse, to tell Bush it is time to go.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
It's time to start holding hearings on impeachment

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

11. It would look partisan, like "revenge" for Clinton by Charlie L on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:13:34 AM
I'm probably nit picking, but, by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:11:18 AM
Great points, Rob by Better World Order on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:15:50 AM
Another thing left off... by Gustav Wynn on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:59:19 AM
I agree wholeheartedly! by William Cormier on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:32:37 AM
About all those 'reasons' by Mark Sashine on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 12:16:31 PM
Ah, yes. by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:15:29 AM
Silence is Approval by cluelessfl on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 1:51:55 PM
Approval? I think not by Southpaw on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 6:42:31 PM
Sorry by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:18:36 AM
Not all reasons are effectively rebutted by Bill Samuel on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 5:12:36 PM
Well Said by Andris on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 5:37:47 PM
The system is not the problem by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 10:37:47 PM
what's new? by Andris on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 5:35:00 PM
People in this country by Jim Freeman on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 6:10:06 PM
Grass Roots work by Ramon Puga on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 6:38:00 PM
Rep. Lynn Woolsey's statement quoted above: A correction by Kathryn Smith on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:55:48 PM
Prosecution trumps Impeachment by Angelo on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 9:41:14 AM
I don't think its true that Congress is implicated by Brett Paatsch on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 8:55:00 PM
today's column on impeachment investigations by Beth Grimes on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 5:00:37 PM
IMPEACHMENT AND COMPLICTY by RICHARD SHADE on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 5:26:52 AM