Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

A New 9/11 Commission: Defining Amnesty

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

opednews.com

Every country seems to have its Velvet Revolution sometime, and, it seems, we may go through ours.  The question I have posed in past articles and discussions is: If you believe 911 was an inside job, and you believe that in order to get at the truth, it may be necessary to grant officers in the military and in the civilian branches like the CIA some sort of immunity, that is, full or partial amnesty for their role or knowledge of the events, how do you determine who gets what?

Surely someone who knew he would be killing innocent civilians merits different consideration than one who did not.  Some may have been following orders which they felt uneasy obeying, sensing that something was amiss.  Some may have felt that the consequences of not following questionable orders would be severe.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but during the Cold War it required two men to simultaneously push their own button in the command bunker to launch a nuclear warhead, a safety measure against one nut flipping out.  Each man's order came from a different officer, an assurance that this was a command decision.  But to be equally safe from enlisted men who understood better than their superiors that this would be the end of humanity, a measure was in place to enforce the pushing of both buttons.  Each man in the bunker had a sidearm, and if one of you refused to sign your name to the Apocalypse, the other man had orders to shoot you.  Communications to the outside world were cut off so you had no way of knowing if your whole family was already dead in a nuclear strike.   Leave it to West Point to think of everything.

Partial amnesty in a new 911 investigation, in one possible scheme, could mean a light sentence for those under duress but who had no idea of the full magnitude of the consequences of their orders.  Full amnesty could be granted to those in the military or civilian chain of command who have knowledge which leads to uncovering the truth in the chain of events, but who personally did not give or carry out any questionable orders. 

A new US House of Representatives resolution could be filed bipartisanly, such as by Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich.  Then the normal democratic process takes over, of lobbying your congressman to become a co-sponsor, showing up at his or her town meetings, calling, writing.  In other words, doing democracy.  Some definition of amnesty should be written into the body of the resolution.

In other truth and reconciliation movements, such as Argentina's, officers admitted to giving the order to kill, or themselves killing, some of the "disappeared" in the "Dirty War."  The Mothers of the Disappeared, as the mothers and grandmothers of the victims called themselves, stood before government buildings in silence with pictures of their loved ones, challenging the government to silence them by killing them as well.  Thus the government was embarrassed into opening investigations.



Some soldiers wept and begged forgiveness in the courtrooms of Argentine Truth and Reconciliation.  The country has moved on.  The aim of new 911 investigations should be to, first, get at the truth, second, punish the highest level of plotters, perpetrators, and intellectual authors of 911, and third, to enable the country to heal and move on. 

The Argentine Dirty War was partially financed and assisted militarily by the American CIA at the time, so we can now learn from those whom we have oppressed.  Who would've thunk these countries could teach America anything?

Ralph Lopez is the author of "Truth in the Age of Bushism."

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Impeach George Bush and Dick Cheney

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He writes for Truth Out, Alternet, Consortium News, Op-Ed News, and other Internet media. He reported from Afghanistan in 2009 and produced a short documentary film on the (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikileaks Soldier Reveals Orders for "360 Rotational Fire" Against Civilians in Iraq

Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

McChrystal Trying to Tell Us Something? "We're F%^*king Losing This Thing"

BoA Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On Taxpayers, Super Committee Looks Away. Seize BoA Now.

Arrests at White House Over NDAA Military Detention of Americans, Occupy Wall Street Joins Fight.

Obama Lied: Taliban Did Not Refuse to Hand Over Bin Laden

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Parole or reduced sentence.  Watergate broke ... by John Hanks on Friday, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:11:15 AM