Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
42 comments

Must Read 7   News 6   Well Said 5  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 12/11/11

Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
OpEdNews Op Eds
Become a Fan
  (10 fans)


opednews.com

Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) on Senate floor explaining it was Obama who requested the provision for indefinite military detention of American citizens without charge or trial.   Levin is a primary co-sponsor of the bill along with Sen. John McCain, and Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.    Senator Diane Feinstein recently confirmed that she was unable to excise Section 1031 in an email:

Senator Feinstein Confirms President and Military Can Detain US Citizens Without a Trial

    Like you, I oppose these provisions.  Section 1031 is problematic because it authorizes the indefinite detention of American citizens without due process.  In this democracy, due process is a fundamental right, and it protects us from being locked up by the government without charge.  For this reason, I offered an amendment to prohibit the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens without trial or charge.  Unfortunately, on December 1, 2011, this amendment failed by a vote of 45-55.

    I was, however, able to reach a compromise with the authors of the defense bill to state that no existing law or authorities to detain suspected terrorists are changed by this section of the bill.  While I would have preferred to have restricted the government's ability to detain U.S. citizens without charge, this compromise at least ensures that the bill does not expand the government's authority in this area.

Senator Levin:

 

Anonymous' Message to the American People

 

Transcript: Dear brothers and sisters. Now is the time to open your eyes!

In a stunning move that has civil libertarians stuttering with disbelief, the U.S. Senate has just passed a bill that effectively ends the Bill of Rights in America.

The National Defense Authorization Act is being called the most traitorous act ever witnessed in the Senate, and the language of the bill is cleverly designed to make you think it doesn't apply to Americans, but toward the end of the bill, it essentially says it can apply to Americans "if we want it to..."  FULL TRANSCRIPT AT YOUTUBE
 

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell





 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Stop Senate bill allowing military detention of American citizens!

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He writes for Truth Out, Alternet, Consortium News, Op-Ed News, and other Internet media. He reported from Afghanistan in 2009 and produced a short documentary film on the (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
42 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Where are The Americans? by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:10:22 AM
Too serious a subject for masked videos by Al Rodbell on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:16:08 AM
Too much spin Al by Ralph Lopez on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:22:49 PM
Wouldn't it be nice if we could count on the Supreme Court by david78209 on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:22:22 AM
Supreme Court already ruled precisely this, LAST FEBRUARY by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:59:57 PM
SCOTUS has ruled no such thing. The closest by Ralph Lopez on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:45:13 PM
Feinstein hopes for life by Michael Rose on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:16:04 PM
Feinstein tries to attack and embrace this bill by Michael Shaw on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:15:13 AM
More on Feinstein's Amendment by Michael Shaw on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:37:22 AM
1031(f) is worse--Sec. of Defense defines "covered persons"! by Jill Herendeen on Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:20:05 AM
Well Jill, apparently Leon Panetta is against it by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:20:36 AM
...Congress, and ITS BACKERS, are indeed the threat. by Jill Herendeen on Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32:45 PM
Feinstein is up for re-election this year by Ruth Hull on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:39:36 PM
As a Californian I know Feinstein all too well! by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:00:23 AM
Something big will happen in 2012 by marko polo on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:37:54 PM
Ron Paul ignored? by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:56:47 AM
He probably also truly WON the 2008 primaries, though we'll by Jill Herendeen on Friday, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:23:48 AM
We delegate by default and apathy. by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:19:37 PM
Yeah, all my neighbors are more likely to believe Fox News by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:06:39 PM
It's that hope thing by Ruth Hull on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:46:39 PM
Poker Face? by Phil DeGrave on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:15:56 PM
That is your heart talking. by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:34:15 PM
Obama has no right to to take any less risk by Ralph Lopez on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:29:03 PM
Ralph; by Paul Repstock on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:14:06 AM
You are right they did pass it by a veto-proof majority by Ralph Lopez on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:55:05 PM
Remember the Patriot Act??? by Paul Repstock on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:31:28 PM
Don't forget those anthrax attacks either by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:29:11 AM
I have considered that too Phil by Michael Shaw on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:23:24 AM
What is the Law? by John Jonik on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:59:45 PM
Halliburton/Kellog Brown Root by Paul Repstock on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:10:15 PM
I always had my doubts on the American Paramilitary by Silviu Marin on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:20:11 PM
Wrong dates... by Silviu Marin on Sunday, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:27:01 PM
Wrong by Robert Tracey on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:19:38 AM
If you are right, the President is insane! by Paul Repstock on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:52:27 AM
But, 2000 & 2004 proved that votes aren't needed to "win" by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:33:18 PM
Actually Robert if it is only a political ploy by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:35:07 AM
Invented People 'R' US-2 by Ray O. Sunshine on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:36:05 AM
Such naivitee... by Silviu Marin on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:18:14 PM
USSR by Ray O. Sunshine on Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:51:11 AM
Well not to get into the midst of controversy by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:50:46 AM
So, have we finally become by Michael Shaw on Monday, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03:22 AM
Patriots by Ted Rosa on Wednesday, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:11:29 PM
Well Ted(and not to bust your bubble)... by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:06:42 PM
OPEN LETTER TO ROCKY ANDERSON by Jim Miller on Friday, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:17:19 PM
Every man woman and child needs to read this... by Tracy Turner on Sunday, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:23:26 PM