Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 10 (11 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

McChrystal Trying to Tell Us Something? "We're F%^*king Losing This Thing"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

Now that the McChrstal Affair looks more like a combination of theater and high-command hari-kari in which McChrystal has removed himself from the role of General William Westmoreland in the history books, it would be a shame to lose what else McChrystal's team was telling us in all drunken frankness. Evidence is building that McChrystal knew perfectly well what was going to go into the Rolling Stone article. Editor Eric Bates said on Morning Joe on June 22 that "everything" had been run by McChrystal and his aides during the week-long fact-checking process, and McChrystal did "absolutely not" push back or voice any objection. Hastings told CNN:

"I had a tape recorder and notepad out the entire time, so it was all very clear that it was on the record."

GlobeNews24.com reports:

"Eric Bates, the magazine's editor, said during an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" that McChrystal was informed of the quotes prior to its publication as part of Rolling Stone's standard fact-checking process -- and that the general did not object to or dispute any of the reporting. Asked if McChrystal pushed back on the story, Bates responded: "No, absolutely not." "We ran everything by them in the fact-checking process as we always do," the Rolling Stone editor said.

One person who doesn't miss much is filmmaker Robert Greenwald, who has made a video (below) calling attention to what else came out during the interview which may be the swan song McChrystal wanted us to hear, whatever his faults, and in this war and in the Pentagon there are no innocents.

"If Americans pulled back and started paying attention to this war, it would become even less popular. -- McChrystal aide"

That doesn't sound like a general particularly positive about the prospects for the next year. Why didn't he just say "Psst! Pull the hell out now!"

- Advertisement -

The mime lays bare what should be clear to most people by now: the policy in Afghanistan is there ain't no policy, except to keep it going. Fewer civilian casualties? More American casualties. More firepower and more civilian casualties? More hatred, more Taliban. The official policy for Afghanistan is to keep the money flowing, no matter what is happening, for Halliburton and Dyncorp, Xe-Blackwater and General Dynamics, who all pony up quite nicely at election time. That's as much of a policy as there is.

All for a war, people now realize, which could be won for the cost of a few months of military spending in the beginning, for carefully-targeted, Afghan-led jobs and development programs.

Targeted, cash-for-work jobs programs, countrywide, for a couple of years, building basic infrastructure would make the Taliban and the warlords irrelevant, as young men drift away and seek to feed their families in less risky ways. Everyone hates the Taliban, but in a vacuum of 40% unemployment it pays $10 a day and at least insures your children don't starve. We don't do nation-building? Too expensive? We've already spent $250 billion on military operations in a country whose entire GDP is $12 billion a year. We could have built this nation 20 times over and had real security in return, with the gratitude and friendship of the Afghan people who would be actively looking for Al Qaeda to kill. There is no love lost for Al Qaeda, the source of so many of their problems.

We need to tell Congress the McChrystal show didn't distract us from the fact that they are about to vote on dumping another $40 billion into war next week (or not.) We should insist that Congress deny the Pentagon funding for anything but orderly withdrawal, the way the Vietnam War was ended, and carefully targeted civilian assistance.

- Advertisement -

It is hard to believe that there are not many other generals who share McChrystal's bleak view, which leads us to the one thing could tip the war vote next week: if another general, right now, this close to the McChrystal thing, followed it up with his own resignation and no-confidence statement on the war. This would rock Washington to the core. We always hear generals saying how much they care about their men. This would be the best way to show it.

To see how your congressman has indicated he or she would vote if the war funding bill is released from committee, go to AfterDowningStreet.org's WHIP WARS.

CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSMAN

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Vote against funding for military operations in Afghanistan, vote for civilian assistance.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Ralph Lopez majored in Economics and Political Science at Yale University. He writes for Truth Out, Alternet, Consortium News, Op-Ed News, and other Internet media. He reported from Afghanistan in 2009 and produced a short documentary film on the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Wikileaks Soldier Reveals Orders for "360 Rotational Fire" Against Civilians in Iraq

Why Obama Will Not Veto NDAA Military Detention of Americans: He Requested It.

McChrystal Trying to Tell Us Something? "We're F%^*king Losing This Thing"

BoA Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On Taxpayers, Super Committee Looks Away. Seize BoA Now.

Arrests at White House Over NDAA Military Detention of Americans, Occupy Wall Street Joins Fight.

Obama Lied: Taliban Did Not Refuse to Hand Over Bin Laden

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Click here for source article Excerpts: LARA LO... by Richard Clark on Wednesday, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:22:19 AM