Tags for This Article:

Government (2752)  People (2279)  People (1544)  Responsibility (504)  Ideas (284)  Paul-Ron (273)  Personal (189)  Libertarian (163) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 8, 2007 at 18:34:46

Ayn Rand, Ron Paul and the Myth that Government Monopolizes Bureaucracy

by Michael Bonanno     Page 1 of 5 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

What Lit the Flame?

Last night, I happened upon a 1959 Mike Wallace interview.  In this interview, Wallace was speaking to Ayn Rand, the goddess of today’s Libertarian Party, the party that Ron Paul would belong to if he had any courage.  But Paul has no courage.  Paul won’t change from a sinking Republican Party to the Libertarian Party because he knows he’d have even less of a chance of being elected.  He won’t bring his millions, and he does have millions, over to the Libertarian Party and run as a Libertarian because he knows he has to keep one foot in the corporate door in order to have any chance of winning at all.

What was the other motivator for what may be a long article about society?

A Personal Experience With Wasteful Bureaucracy

I apologize that I use a personal experience to make my point, but what experiences are we more familiar with than those we’ve personally experienced.  We really have no better points of reference.

I moved from Connecticut to California in the fateful year 2001.  My right knee started bothering me when I arrived in California and, by November of 2002, the pain was so bad and the x-rays showed such a deterioration that my orthopedic doctor suggested a knee replacement.  I received a knee replacement in 2002.

At that time, the surgeon couldn’t promise me how long the knee would last.  He was very honest.  He said that they’ve gotten better and some people have lived the rest of their lives with a prosthetic knee.  Of course, many of those people were well into their 70s and some 80s.  At the time, I was 42.

The doctor told me that he expects the knee to last at least 15 years – but, of course, he didn’t promise.

Between 2001 and the present, my back began to give me trouble.  In fact, the pain has become unbearable and I’m taking heavy doses of very strong pain medication.  The medication is hardly touching the pain.

I went to one doctor who said surgery should be the very last road that I should take in order to fix the problem.  At that time the back had just started to bother me and I let it go for a while.

However, the pain increased significantly and my orthopedic doctor suggested that I see a pain management group.

I had some x-rays taken and took them with me to the pain management doctor.

Note that every time I saw a different doctor, I first had to see my primary care physician in order to get a reference.  I’d go to my pcp and he would say, “Hello.  So what can I do for you today?”

I’d tell him and he said, “Oh, you need a referral?  No problem.”

I paid my copay and got a permission slip to see the orthopedic surgeon and the pain management doctor.  I could not see any of those doctors without first having to pay my pcp for a permission slip.

I brought the x-rays to the pain management doctor who looked at them and said, “You’re in trouble, dude.”

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Song sample for September, 2008 Let The Sun Shine Down from the cd Flameland.

Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay AreaSome of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews. 

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may be purchased at CD Baby.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments

bio
joestonebio

Ron Paul will take care of veterans

 In your article you claim: 

“So, Representative Paul, what happens to these people after we bring them back from Iraq?” You sure as hell aren’t going to take care of them

 It's true that Ron Paul is usually against spending, but the veterans are an exception. He said in a TV show in New Hampshire that the function of the government is defense, and taking care of our veterans is part of it.

by joestone (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Monday, October 8, 2007 at 7:32:50 PM
 


Jeffersonian democratic republican.
wchJeffersonian democratic republican.

Missing the point

MR. Bonanno, while experssing on the face of it, legitimate concerns, misses the point.

 First of all, Dr. paul is not Ayn Rand and this article keeps confusing the two.  Secondly, Any Rand was a fiction writer, and she's been dead a good number of years.. 

Mr. Bonanno's gripe with bureaucracy, and his pont about government not having a monopoly on bureaucracy, are correct.

Here is the error:  The problem is not government bureaucracy, it is instead, hidden, under the radar, government sanctioned monopoly masquerading as free enterprise that is the problem.  This is what we have today in America.  Halliburton, The Carlyle Group, Brown Brothers Harriman, Blackwater, etc.

In Mr. Bonanno's example of his pain problem, the drug companies are the culprits, as well as the insurance companies.  His physicians, whether or not they were as astute clinicians as they should be, behave the way they do because the system they work under forces them to do so.  In addition, the prices Mr. Bonanno paid for his medications were vastly inflated simply because the drug companies have a lock on the market through the FDA and their unmatched congressional lobbying armies.  His insurance company is right in there with them.  He likely was never offered truly effective pain control because his insurance company was never going to authorize it, and his doctors knew it.  Time does not permit, but I could really give you shocking examples.   This form of government is fascism, and it is what you live under in America today.

 Mr. Paul simply wants you to be able to have more control, to be able to have representatives who really represent you and not the corporate elite.

 

 

 

by wch (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 14 comments) on Monday, October 8, 2007 at 7:48:43 PM
 


I am a patriot.
Son of PubliusI am a patriot.

This guy is way off...

What sends up the biggest red flag is the small word toward the end of the first page of the article: copay.

The implication of such a phrase in this article is that the author most likely has employer-provided HMO insurance, which means that the bureaucracy he's experienced in his anecdote is one of government design, not of free-market functionality.

In short: he doesn't know the difference between corporatism (a.k.a. fascism) and true free-market capitalism. His confusion over such an issue essentially renders incorrect any suppositions based on his own misunderstanding.

by Son of Publius (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 4 comments) on Monday, October 8, 2007 at 8:09:46 PM
 


Atlanta, GA
Thomas VietorAtlanta, GA

Wow

There's so much misunderstanding on multiple levels. . .

Google: "Ron Paul Files" (or is it archives?) and read some of Dr. Paul's writings to clarify some of his ideas. 

Dr. Paul needs to start a campaign to clarify the many things he says for those who don't know him and haven't done a true research on him. That's one thing he can do better.

by Thomas Vietor (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 20 comments) on Monday, October 8, 2007 at 8:34:12 PM
 


My name is Josh Gross. I live in Rockville, Maryland. I am a political moderate who values personal liberty and small government.
Josh GrossMy name is Josh Gross. I live in Rockville, Maryland. I am a political moderate who values personal liberty and small government.

you might be confused

Ron Paul has never asserted that caring about other is immoral.  He believes that it is wrong for the government to forcibly seize personal earnings and redistibute wealth.  If you think it is important to help others then that is great.  Take some of your money and donate it to a cause that you deam worthy.  Maybe you already have, and that is fantastic.  Ron Paul believes that you are smart enough to spend the money the way you want and donate to the causes that you want. 

I think many people think they can forgo their moral obligation to help others by placing the responsibility on the government.   Ron Paul believes the  responsibility falls on the individual and that charity should be voluntary.

by Josh Gross (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Monday, October 8, 2007 at 8:43:49 PM
 


Atlanta, GA
Thomas VietorAtlanta, GA

Opensecrets.org

Oh btw, check out the link below:

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.asp?cycle=2008

I recommend the "Selected Industries" and the "Donor Demographics" tab.

No surprise to see the democrat's-lobbyists/TV and Republican's-big oil combo.

by Thomas Vietor (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 20 comments) on Monday, October 8, 2007 at 9:28:33 PM
 


Imposing virtue at the point of the gun is not virtuous ... giving others' money is not charity.
tremtieImposing virtue at the point of the gun is not virtuous ... giving others' money is not charity.

It's all about coercion

I consider myself a borderline libertarian, and I absolutely think I have the responsibility to try to help my fellow man. I don't, however, think I have the right to mug you, take your money, and help my fellow man with that. Nor do I think I have the right to stick a gun to your back and force you to behave morally. It's quite simple.

Unfortunately, it actually takes sacrifice to give your own money to help people, or to boycott a business that you would otherwise enjoy because they treat minorities poorly. It's much easier to espouse grand philanthropic intentions using others' confiscated money, and claim that you did something to help. That's why there will always be those whos first reaction to a problem is not, "how can I help?" but, "how can I compel others to do it for me".

 Bureaucracy is bad. When it occurs in the private sector, you can switch companies (unless the industry is so heavily regulated by government, as the heath industry is, that little freedom is left). Companies whos customers switch away tend to go out of business or change, and companies that give the customer what they want tend to survive. You can't switch away from government bureaucracy -- on threat of violence you're stuck with it. Thus, we are stuck with incredebly wasteful institutions for generation after generation (public schools anyone?) that would have long since gone out of business if competition were allowed. It's not that government is wasteful, it's that it sticks a gun to your back and makes you participate.

by tremtie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 3:27:00 AM
 


I'm an Aussie with an interest in global politics.
kenI'm an Aussie with an interest in global politics.

Well said Michael

I'm an Aussie. I pay about 3% of my annual income for a government run Medicare program providing basic medical services, hospital care, essental operations etc. Everybody does. People can supplement this by taking out private health coverage for faster treatment in private hospitals, and for discretionary surgery, private rooms etc. EVERYBODY gets health care. Absolutely everybody! The idea that some six year old kid has to suffer without medical care because their parents are poor we would regard as complete barbarism. And this is the way it is in every other civilized country I know of -- New Zealand, France, the UK, Germany etc.

Now, here's the rub. Nationally, we pay about 2/3 per head of population what you do in the US for a service that is 50% better! We are not talking third world health care here. We are talking first class, developed world standard health care. You are paying through the nose in your country for an inferior product with the extortionate profits going straight to the bottom line of your big insurance and drug companies. It's criminal! Seriously. It's like having standover criminals at your door on pay day taking a cut or threatening to break your legs. Do you understand that it simply does not cost $5000 to fix a broken arm in other Western countries? You've got crooks running your medical services.

And this has nothing to do with "free market ideals" or "taking personal responsibility" or anything else. I've visited your country a few times and enjoyed it. I have friends and relatives there. ONLY in America and no other developed country is this idiotic ideological nonsense being debated about "socialized medicine". Respectfully, it's intellectual garbage. When your country gets over handing across huge piles of money to insurance sharks for an inferior service and refuses to punish innocent children for being born to the wrong parents and getting sick can you ever hope to get a decent national medical service. The rest of the world is doing it. It works. I hope you guys can too.

Libertarianism is a uniquely American brand of ideological lunacy. It displays a mindless contempt for government (the same government that provides you with perfectly adequate police and fire fighters but not, apparently, medical services. Try to imagine if all police services were privately operated...it would be an expensive nightmare).

Very well said, Michael Bonanno, and totally true. Ron Paul is clearly a principled man, but his economic views are ideological nonsense.

by ken (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 43 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 3:57:38 AM
 


Well-traveled, middle-aged, mechanical engineer.
M. BennettWell-traveled, middle-aged, mechanical engineer.

Fifth grade worlview

Look, Bonanno is not very sophisticated and obviously not well educated. Just let him exist in his fifth-grade world.

by M. Bennett (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 71 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 3:25:40 PM
 


Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments. He is Chair of the Independent Party of Maryland.
Joel S. HirschhornJoel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments. He is Chair of the Independent Party of Maryland.

Ron Paul supporters have drugged themselves with delusion

Some truths about Paul's positions:

2007  Ron Paul is NOT against pork spending through earmarks:

 

"Eliminating earmarks designated by Members of Congress would simply transfer the funding decision process to federal bureaucrats rather then elected representatives. In an already flawed system, earmarks can at least allow residents of Congressional districts to have a greater role in allocating federal funds – their tax dollars – than if the money is allocated behind locked doors by bureaucrats."

 

2004  Ron Paul is NOT for abolishing the Electoral College and going to the popular vote for president:

"The will of the people was to be tempered by the wisdom of the Electoral College.  By contrast, election of the President by pure popular vote totals would damage statehood. Populated areas on both coasts would have increasing influence on national elections, to the detriment of less populated southern and western states. A candidate receiving a large percentage of the popular vote in California and New York could win a national election with very little support in dozens of other states! A popular vote system simply would intensify the populist pandering which already dominates national campaigns."

2004  Ron Paul actually thinks that the government was not necessary to promote civil rights:

"the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty.  Of course, America has made great strides in race relations over the past forty years. However, this progress is due to changes in public attitudes and private efforts. Relations between the races have improved despite, not because of, the 1964 Civil Rights Act. "

by Joel S. Hirschhorn (118 articles, 22 quicklinks, 54 diaries, 472 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 5:15:21 PM
 


Just a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
craig dJust a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

another thing...

Homework for you: Explain why the following incorrect and how the civil rights act actually did help race relations and enhanc freedom...

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty.  Of course, America has made great strides in race relations over the past forty years. However, this progress is due to changes in public attitudes and private efforts. Relations between the races have improved despite, not because of, the 1964 Civil Rights Act. "

That is, if you are able to string together a logical argument, which, in light of your previous post, there is scant supporting evidence.

by craig d (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 8:07:16 AM
 


Atlanta, GA
Thomas VietorAtlanta, GA

Again, Joel

You over-simplify Ron Paul into quotes that misrepresent him. You're a simple-minded persons, or at least that's how you come across as being. Either that or your on a anti-Paul crusade  with no intention of dicussing and simply reposting the same crap over and over.

Go educate yourself about Paul's ideas and reasoning.

by Thomas Vietor (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 20 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 8:58:37 PM
 


Just a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
craig dJust a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

You have drugged yourself with ignorance

Joel S. Hirschhorn

#1. You are the worst kind of ignoramous, because you have the facts at your fingertips, and choose to distort or ignore them

 #2. Ron Paul is against taking earmarks out of the hands of elected legislative representatives and handing the authority to unelected federal agencies, which would be unconstitutional and transfer more power out of the hands of the people. The critical sentence that you omit:

Because earmarks are funded from spending levels that have been determined before a single earmark is agreed to, with or without earmarks the spending levels remain the same. Eliminating earmarks designated by Members of Congress would simply transfer the funding decision process to federal bureaucrats rather then elected representatives.

#3. Good. The founding fathers realized that a pure democracy creates majority rule and no check on the ability of that majority "to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual." In other words, a republic helps to secure minority rights, genius.

#4. The data is available from the BLS. You can graph the average income of black and other minority races from the 30's onward. As you would expect, income increases as time increases.  However, The slope of this increase declines following the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This is not to say that the Act is a cause of this decline, but it certainly did not improve the economic circumstances of minorities in this country. But, hey, keep on thinking that elected officials know better and that without them we are all lost sheep.

by craig d (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 7:55:33 AM
 

 

13 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Anne Kilkenny Full Email on Sarah Palin by Rady Ananda

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

High Treason: 'Pentagon Lied to the 911 Commission' ; Bush's Theory Falls Apart by Len Hart

Librarians Against Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

It's Sunday - So Where's Sarah? by steve young

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular