When one not only reads the U.S. Constitution but understands the reason for it and it applies directly to ones self does it really have impact.

When it happens, one knows.

Right now, I can only assume most have never read it. Most think it was a document that is not in effect and was just something from the past.

No, it is the supreme law of the land and every state law must not violate the U.S. Constitution and every citizen is under the oath of abiding by the laws of the Constitution.

Thanks to all those young people that have realized how important this is.

I am impressed and at least now hopefull after spending most of my life fighting against a country that evidently loves committing suicide.

by DRSANGLE (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Monday, Jan 14, 2008 at 6:06:32 PM

  (0+)

Just as Congress have delegated its duties in other areas you have mentioned it has done the same for "general welfare".

For instance the Red Cross is responsible for assisting people in disasters under  it's congressional charter. Oddly enough they give them no money to do the job.

Hillary Clinton ran for the wrong office as has so many other candidates. The President and Senate do not get to spend the money at least in constitutional theory.

by Gallaher (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 990 comments [34 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:50:04 AM

  (0+)

It's nice to see someone actually reading and trying to understand that document, but that may not be enough. Formal education might be needed. A few pointers: Jefferson had nothing to do with the Constitution; he was an envoy to France at the time. James Madison is credited with pushing for the Constitution and Gouverneur Morris was the scribe who actually wrote down the words. The "general welfare" clause applies only to taxing and spending; such as Social Security, Medicare or similar programs. The power to regulate commerce covers many areas such as minimum wages, safe work places, pollution and others. You are right that "originalists" or "strict constructionists" are fools. I wrote about them recently at: http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_thomas_b_070605_protecting_our_const.htm

by tabonsell (33 articles, 0 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 318 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 4:53:05 PM

  (0+)

all for trying to help me along with my education.

I think back to my high school days and there's the teacher trying to teach us (me) about this stuff and I'm daydreaming about nailing the blond who's in my geometry class.  What a fool, hey?

Michael Bonanno

by Michael Bonanno (119 articles, 19 quicklinks, 24 diaries, 152 comments) on Tuesday, Jan 15, 2008 at 5:32:43 PM

  (0+)