|
|
Add to My Group
If the government's account of 9/11 is not accurate, wouldn't the media have been "all over it"? Initially, there has been self-censorship by journalists. Indeed, journalists who have even asked innocuous questions about 9/11 have been threatened. And, referring to another topic, a leading MSNBC news commentator has said that there is self-censorship in the American media, and that: As Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official Karen Kwiatkowski has written (at page 26): In fact many journalists are warning that the true story is not being reported. See this announcement and this talk. And a series of interviews with award-winning journalists also documents censorship of certain stories by media editors and owners (and see these samples). There are many reasons for censorship by media higher-ups. One is money. The media has a strong monetary interest to avoid controversial topics in general. It has always been true that advertisers discourage stories which challenge corporate power. Indeed, a 2003 survey reveals that 35% of reporters and news executives themselves admitted that journalists avoid newsworthy stories if “the story would be embarrassing or damaging to the financial interests of a news organization’s owners or parent company.” False flag terrorism is the most controversial topic there is. Exposure of the truth about 9/11 would challenge the government and the corporate status quo. Exposure of the truth of 9/11 would directly damage the bottom line of the war profiteers (see below). It would also damage the financial interests of the news organizations, since revelation of the truth would show how bad the mainstream media has been in covering real news, thus encouraging more people to get their news from other sources. In addition, the Bush administration is allowing tremendous consolidation in ownership of the airwaves. The large media players stand to gain billions of dollars in profits if the administration continues to allow monopoly ownership of the airwaves by a handful of players. The media giants know who butters their bread. So there is a spoken or tactit agreement: if the media cover the administration in a favorable light, the MSM will continue to be the receiver of the government's goodies. And censoring the truth about 9/11 is a large part of covering the administration in a favorable light.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/ George Washington George Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher, because I have received death threats due to my 9/11 research and writing. I am using a pen name to protect myself and my family.
Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008 |
|
