Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ;
Add to My Group
May 21, 2009 at 13:21:29

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/21/09:

Obama Is Considering Doing Something Even Bush Didn't Try: "Preventive Detention" of People Who Will Never Get a Trial

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By George Washington (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: George Washington - Writer

The New York Times is reporting :

President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a “preventive detention” system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried...

“He was almost ruminating over the need for statutory change to the laws so that we can deal with individuals who we can’t charge and detain,” one participant said. “We’ve known this is on the horizon for many years, but we were able to hold it off with George Bush. The idea that we might find ourselves fighting with the Obama administration over these powers is really stunning.”

The other participant said Mr. Obama did not seem to be thinking about preventive detention for terrorism suspects now held at Guantánamo Bay, but rather for those captured in the future, in settings other than a legitimate battlefield like Afghanistan.

What justification could their possibly be for refusing someone a trial? Remember, there are well-established procedures for making sure that sensitive information which would actually detrimental to national security if released is kept away from the general public, such as "in camera" hearings (which is legal talk for a hearing held "in chambers").

Is Obama saying that an American citizen living inside the United States (America is presumably not a legitimate battlefield like Afghanistan - but see this) can be indefinitely detained without trial because Obama considers him a risk to national security?

What would constitute a risk to national security warranting detention? Revealing unlawful actions by the Bush administration? The Obama administration? Criticizing Obama?

Will the former constitutional law professor (Obama) use his knowledge of the law to safeguard the constitution, or - like the authors of the torture memos - to subvert it?

 

www.WashingtonsBlog.com

George Washington

George Washington is a pen name. I am using the pen name, with the approval of the publisher.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

STUMBLING FORWARD by Blaine Kinsey on Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 8:41:57 PM
This revelation, by richard on Friday, May 22, 2009 at 12:24:13 AM
Countless lives by Perry Logan on Saturday, May 23, 2009 at 12:50:09 PM
That's right Logan, it's all Republicans fault ... by Mr M on Sunday, May 24, 2009 at 12:55:03 AM
And we could hear a pin drop.... by Ingrid on Saturday, May 23, 2009 at 7:24:02 PM
i am alarmed. by Peggy Nicholson on Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 8:12:17 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum