Tags for This Article:

Fundamentalism (454) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s):
Add to My Group
June 29, 2007 at 08:34:20

Questions Your Pastor Will Hate Part 5

by Dennis Diehl

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

 Ok Pastor, just a few more and then wrap it up. You've been really helpful just sitting there staring at me.

Did you know that Matthew copies 91% of Mark and Luke copies 53% of Mark?  Is that a kind of inspiration I'm not familiar with?   Anyway....

Question. Pastor…Where does John come up with all the detailed dialogue in chapters 14-17 when no other Gospel begins to mention any of that? This had to be done by memory right? No one could get that kind of detail right if they just wrote from memory, especially since in just a few more minutes, everyone would be fleeing for their lives and leaving Jesus on his own. It does say, “they all fled.” I just think it’s odd that the Gospel said to have been written very late and last, has the most detail, where Mark, written first, has little or none of this dialogue. Or is this a case of writing what the author would imagine Jesus to have said in such circumstances, which I understand was a writing style of the day?

Question. Pastor…Mark 16:8 tells us that the women left the tomb afraid and didn’t say anything to anyone and then the original Gospel of Mark ends. Where is the ending? Also, Matthew 28:6-8 says the women ran away with “great joy,” which sounds to me like Matthew felt a need to correct Mark. Luke 24: 9-12 says they went and told the disciples, contradicting Mark and John 20:1-2 says Mary told the disciples that the body was stolen which contradicts the “great joy” of Matthew. What gives? Sounds to me like the women ran away afraid with great joy telling no one but then everyone that the body was stolen? Help me out here!

Question. Pastor…Mark 16:14-15 tells us that Jesus tells the eleven to preach the Gospel. Matthew 28:9 allows Mary Magdalene and another Mary to hold his feet, but then John 20:17 forbids touching, as he had not yet ascended, but the next week Thomas touches Jesus hands. I assume Jesus was meaning his later public ascension and did not do a secret trip back to heaven to check in before he really went back in full view. What’s the story here?

Question. Pastor…Why all the doubting about the resurrection of Jesus with the disciples? In Mark 16:11, Luke 24:11 - Everyone doubts and/or is scared at first, but eventually they see the light and believe. In Matthew 28:16 only some doubt, but most believe. In John 20:24-28 everyone believes, but Thomas, who comes to believe. See how the doubting gets less and less in the order of the writing? Seems like each author is cleaning up the doubts of the previous one to paint a nicer picture and make the disciples not look so doubtful. Belief just gets easier and easier as time goes on right?

Question. Pastor…When and where from did Jesus return to heaven? Mark 16:14-19 says he ascends while they are all sitting at a table, inside I presume, near Jerusalem. Matthew 28:16-20 doesn’t mention ascension at all, but Jesus does meet the disciples for the first time at a Mountain in Galilee where he had told them in 26:32 he would meet them after his resurrection. But then in Luke 24:50-51 Jesus ascends outside, after dinner, and at Bethany and on the same day as the resurrection! I guess Luke realized that Jesus would have had to go through the roof in Mark's account, so got him outside where they could see him go into the clouds instead of just into the rafters. Luke also corrects Matthew’s “I’ll first meet you in Galilee” by saying in Luke 24: 5-8 that they needed to remember that Jesus told them, when in Galilee that he would see them again in Jerusalem by rising from the dead there.

Seems like Luke is correcting Matthew idea that Jesus would see them in Galilee by reminding them Jesus told them, when in Galilee, they would see him in Jerusalem, where events needed to take place for Luke. John mentions no ascension and in Acts 1:9-12 we are told Jesus ascends at least 40 days after his resurrection and from the Mt. of Olives.

Now all these things can’t be a harmonious account of just where and when the ascension occurred. We remember the ascension story of Luke in Acts, but the others don’t match his. They just don’t.

Question. Pastor…When did John find out Jesus was the Messiah? In Matthew 3:13-17 John seems to know and baptizes Jesus, but then, in Matthew 11:2-3, while imprisoned, John the Baptist sent followers to Jesus to inquire if Jesus was the messiah. Did he forget?  Also in Luke 7:18-22 John the Baptist sent followers to Jesus to inquire if Jesus was the Messiah.  but in John 1:29-34,36 John already knew Jesus was the Messiah. Also, remember how when pregnant Mary walked into the room of pregnant Elizabeth and John leaped for joy in the womb of Elizabeth. Did baby John memories of Jesus as Lord fade and was he not told all the miraculous stories of both their births? Maybe John doubted the whole thing after he found himself in prison facing death. Or maybe the story evolved a bit as we have seen in other stories?

Question. Pastor… In Matthew 9:18 as certain ruler comes to Jesus to ask for help, saying his daughter was already dead. But in Luke 8:41-42, Jairus approached Jesus for help, because his daughter was dying. Now I am a parent and would know if my child was dying or dead! Healing the dying is a bit easier than healing the dead too I might add. So was she or wasn’t she?

Question. Pastor… In Matthew 10:10 Jesus instructed the disciples not to take a staff and not to wear sandals. But in Mark 6:8-9 Jesus instructed his disciples to wear sandals and take a staff on their journey. Seems like the same sending forth to preach and not two different times. Can you see how confusing this is? I wonder who showed up wearing or not wearing and carrying or not carrying what? Since Mark is the oldest Gospel, don’t you think that’s the way to go?

Question. Pastor…In Matthew 20:20-21 the mother of requested of Jesus that James and John, Zebedee’s children, should sit beside him in his Kingdom. But in Mark 10:35-37 James and John, Zebedee’s children, requested that they should sit beside Jesus in his Kingdom with no mention of mom. Could it be that Matthew added that mom did the asking to cover the embarrassingly real story of the disciples James and John asking this humble request right after Jesus had just given a short speech on the first being last and the last first, and them evidently missing the point? And if so, isn’t this the editing of God’s inspired word again by men, not to mention blaming mom?

Question. Pastor… How many blind men besought Jesus? Matthew 20:30 says Two blind men sought healing, but in Luke 18:35-38, only one blind man did. Do you think that maybe Luke just didn’t see the other one..ha! Or maybe Luke was deaf and didn’t hear the story right. Ok, just kidding. We need to lighten up here! But I’d remember if it was two or just one since I have a brother that is blind.

Question. Pastor…Did Jesus preach his first sermon on the Mount or down on the plains? Matthew, in 5:1-2, says Jesus preached his first sermon on the mount but, of course, Luke 6:17 & 20 says that Jesus preached his first sermon in the plain.

In Bible times, were Mounts also considered Plains? I do know the difference between our Great Plains and Rocky Mountains here in America, but maybe I am missing something. I know the temptation here is to say what difference does it make where he preached, but if you gave a really good sermon in the church and I kept telling everyone it was in the park, wouldn’t you want me to correct that? Or would you at least not think one of us wasn’t really there to hear it?

Question. Pastor…Where did the devil take Jesus first? In Matthew 4:5-8 the Devil took Jesus first to the parapet of the temple, then to a high place to view all the Kingdoms of the world. But in Luke 4:5-9, the Devil took Jesus first to a high place to view the kingdoms, then to the parapet of the temple. What the Devil is going on here! Once again, I know I would remember if I first when to Greenville, SC and then to Rochester, NY or to Rochester first, then Greenville. I just remember stuff like that! What gives?

Question. Pastor… In Matthew 6:9-13 Jesus delivered the Lord’s Prayer during the Sermon on the Mount before the multitudes. But in Luke 11:1-4, he delivered it before the disciples alone, and not as part of the Sermon on the Mount. Which was it, or were the disciples too far back in the crowd to hear it being given originally on the Mount? Or was it the Plain, I forget? And as long as we are at it, why would Paul not quote it and instead said in Romans 8:26 “for we know not what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit itself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.” Seems he just made up a new “how ought men to pray” and never heard the Lord’s format. Well, I do realize he had lived and died before the Lord’s prayer was written down, but you’d think he would have heard such a basic teaching of Jesus. I guess it’s good to know the Spirit groans for us. Can’t the Spirit just speak? Nevermind…

Question. Pastor…Matthew says in 19:19 to” honor your father and mother.” But then in Luke 14:26 it says those that “come to me and does not hate his father and mother, cannot be my disciple.” Even in John 2:3-4 Jesus is said to have cracked back to his mom when the wine ran out, “woman, what concern is that to you and me?” Kinda harsh isn’t it? Then in Matthew 8:21 when a disciple begs for permission to go buy his father, Jesus says no, and that his whole spiritually dead family should bury his father. Whew…so if this is Jesus idea of honoring mom and dad, it seems a bit off putting to say the least. What do you think?

Well Pastor, I guess that's about it for now.  Pastor?  You OK?  Any comments at all?  Hey, where you going?  What?   I'm going where? But you're the one that told me to study my Bible and if I had any questions to ask you.  What?  The wisdom of man is foolishness with God?  That's my answer?  What?  The questions might seem right to me but will end in death?  What?  Trust and Obey for there's no other way?  Sorry I asked.

 

 

Dennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors. 

 

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments

Hospital chaplain, UCC minister, married parent of 3, like to work on cars and motorcycles, absolutely detest MSM and anything to the right of 91.7 on the FM dial, aging unconformist from the time of birth, and am getting really, really, really fearful for my family's future.
J. Richard FowlerHospital chaplain, UCC minister, married parent of 3, like to work on cars and motorcycles, absolutely detest MSM and anything to the right of 91.7 on the FM dial, aging unconformist from the time of birth, and am getting really, really, really fearful for my family's future.

Pastoral answers, or pastor's answers

Oooohhh, you troublemaker, you! I come from a liberal denomination, and am an ordained UCC pastor. I can no longer use the Bible, except for some occasional teaching. It is painful and awkward. Your article raises some quite obvious scriptural contradictions, and you also raise the consternation many people experience when an assumed authority is questioned... and questionable. Yet... thus is the prophetic call to ministry, right? It's good to read stuff like this and know that there are still people out there willing to challenge assumptions, doctrine, dogma and authoritarianism. Keep on fighting the good fight.

Rick Fowler

by J. Richard Fowler (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 11:04:10 AM
 


electronic technician, truth seeker
Bob Gormleyelectronic technician, truth seeker

Another One

You're another one .....

    You don't use the Bible because it painful and awkward? Are you ashamed of God's teachings? Your in the wrong line of work if you

are.

by Bob Gormley (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 878 comments) on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 5:18:35 PM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Rickdog where is your integrity with your church.

Rickdog, you just made a catgorical statement: "Yet... thus is the prophetic call to ministry, right?" On what grounds do you base this pronunciation? I say it is not. You prove it is.

The Apostle Paul said, "Preach the Word (meaning the Scriptures), be instant in season (to preach them) and out of season (to preach the Scriptures)." If you had any integrity, you would share with you Church how you no longer believe the Scriptures to be the Written Word of God, and if your Christian Church believes the Scriptures to be the Written Word of God you should immediately resign without being asked. You are indeed a wolf parading in sheep clothing if you continue in your position.

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 940 comments) on Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 6:47:00 PM
 


Dennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   
Dennis DiehlDennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   

Hi Ric,

Thank you for your generous observations.  I can assure you there are those wanting to pin my ears back with easy apologetics for those questions...however...I have apologized too much for these questions so they who don't burn me at the stake, make me strong..ha.

by Dennis Diehl (67 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 55 comments) on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 11:24:12 AM
 


electronic technician, truth seeker
Bob Gormleyelectronic technician, truth seeker

Why Don't You Act Like a Pastor

Why don't you act like a pastor instead of a literary critic?

The Bible has a basic spiritual message: love, peace, forgiveness,etc.

You focus on the literacy accuracy of things such as sandals, etc.

It's a good thing you quit as a pastor 'cuz I don't think you get the basic

message. What have you accomplished with all your nitpicking? You probably ruined the faith of some seeking answers. Why don't you focus

on the positive aspects of the Bible (there are many).

     You proved that the the wording of the Bible is not 100% accurate, so

what?

by Bob Gormley (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 878 comments) on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 5:16:58 PM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

gormly

He has not proved a darn thing, just that he is not trained in a Christian seminary.

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 940 comments) on Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 6:49:56 PM
 


Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

W.M.L.Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

AGENT PROVOCATEUR

Apparently, you have never heard of the Q document nor studied New Testament theology, nor bothered to read some of the very thoughtful comments to your previous posts.

In any event, if I were going to make up a Gospel, or a Good Book, I would certainly make sure there were no inconsistencies within it for some divisive character to use to discredit it. Those very contradictions, therefore, argue for the credibility of the four Witness's independent accounts according to their own memories as adapted for their readership from the Q document, not the Gospel of Mark.

I cannot help but wonder why you are posting here; where there are no Christian fundamentalists, but only a handful of Christian progressives, most of which would agree with your basic thesis that Christian fundamentalism is little more than a knot of the new fascism slowly strangling America. I suggest that if you are not merely an agent provocateur, posting here to create division, that you try posting at Free Republic, where a true audience for your views awaits your insight.

by W.M.L. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 265 comments) on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 6:50:45 PM
 


Dennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   
Dennis DiehlDennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   

Topics

I see you comment often but have written nothing for Opednews.  If you were to check the topic headings available to contributors you'd find an abundance of categories that fit what they accept from contributors.  Many a lot more provocative in "religion" than anything I write.  You don't know my background nor my sincerity and asking questions is how one moves ahead in understanding.  The Fourth Century was not the high water mark of Church understanding. 

by Dennis Diehl (67 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 55 comments) on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 9:36:33 PM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Topic

You are right, but the first three centuries were. Constatine ruined it all by breaking down the separation of religion and chuch which Islam has done, too. It is why Islam is not successful in progressive societies. They hate the questions.

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 940 comments) on Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 6:53:44 PM
 


Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

W.M.L.Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

NONRESPONSIVE

Many of my comments have been as long and detailed as an article, and once again, you have failed to address a single point that a commentator has made regarding the fallacies of your questions in this and prior postings. You are merely a divisive influence. If you truly sought answers, you might start by asking what might be the Q document that I have twice now referenced. Or you might ask what I mean by the authors writing for different audiences. You seek not answers, though, but merely to condemn.

by W.M.L. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 265 comments) on Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 12:05:16 AM
 


Dennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   
Dennis DiehlDennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   

questions for the pastor to answer froma layman

I'm very familiar with Q and whether or not it exists or not as well.  The questions are not unique to me and have been asked by and noticed by thousands. The questions are presented as a layman might ask a pastor.

If you will read the above postings you will also not the positive comments about asking them from other pastors who recongnize the problems with the idea of inerrancy.  These are layman questions to a pastor who has a responsibility to have a good answer especially if he uses the Bible to motivate by shame , guilt and fear for even asking them. 

I don't personally accept the apologetic for each or the hundreds of others not given that have to be tortured out of the text or assumptions made, that I was taught for three decades.  People change when they soak in something that produces questions that have no good answer, to me, when the idea is that the Bible is one harmonious whole, spoken by God with no mistakes or contraditcitons.  Millions know this is just not so.

 In my thirty year experience, asking questions outside the box of denominational spin or accepted apologetic was costly.  Without questions, there is no human progress just as without falling forward, there is no walking.

by Dennis Diehl (67 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 55 comments) on Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 5:56:03 AM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Another attack by an anti-Christian.

Dennis you are immently silly, but I willl deal with each one of these "so called discrepancies" of yours  if you prefer.  Why did you not try to find out the answers if you were a Pastor. I cannot deal with them tonight.

Since the Scriptures are a Christian's only rule of faith and practice, except the Roman Catholics believe in a second fountain of Revelaion and that being all the decisions by all the church councils counting the times the Pope has spoken out of the Church, how can you ever claim to have been a Christian when there is none of the Bible you believe? You claim to have been Christian minister and a teaching Pastor. What did you teach? Did you just teach how the Bible is false and Koran is true.

Wow. We see through the charade. I think you are of another religion and not being honest. Christians are not allowed to lie. Are you allowed to lie in your religion?

Again, I just came back from a three day trip, and just turned my PC on about an hour ago. I will deal with each one of your arguments if you prefer, but not today and not tomorrow. I have a message to finish preparing, time for prayer, a Bible lesson to review and a lecture to finish up on power point for tomorrow night. If I have time I will answer some of your arguments as I have done in your previous "Questions Your Pastor Will Hate." If knew as little about the Bible as you do and were a Pastor I guess I would really feel uneasy, too; however, the fault lies you, poor Dennnis, not in the Holy Scriptures.

 

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 940 comments) on Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 6:38:19 PM
 


Dennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   
Dennis DiehlDennis Diehl is a former pastor of 26 years,  who outgrew the Literalism of Fundamentalism.  He writes about Pastoral and Church abuse and is available to speak on such topics or be helpful to any church suffering under abusive religion or pastors.   

One can't unsee what they do see...

Perhaps it would be more profitable and beneficial to run the questions by your Sunday School group.  If you take a read through all the comments, you'll see that people filter the perspectives of others differently.  You are offended, others are not and others are very appreciative.  This is what asking questions is for...to get people to think.  

I am well aware of the apologetics and simply do not find them satisfying any longer.  That's my right as it is yours to judge and label I suppose.  You can save your time on me personally, but again, feel free to submit an article to opednews to answer the few of thousands that could be asked of the text.  You would help many many more people if you did rather than just address me.  I am sure they have a category that would fit your rebuttal. 

My soul is fine.  Give the other postings a read and see that you get to see it through your eyes as others get to see it through there's and don't come to the same conclusions, which is just fine. 

by Dennis Diehl (67 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 55 comments) on Sunday, July 1, 2007 at 5:56:06 AM
 


Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me
pratliff94Don'pigeon hole me or sterotype me

Offended?

You think way too high of yourself. You do not offend me. You are probably correct about running them by a Sunday School class. Sunday School class members are everyday working lay Christians whose faith is attacked constantly by pseudo-intellectuals who claim to have inside information as to why the Scriptures are false and their faith is a sham. Mohammed bases most of his knowledge about Jesus Christ on the pseudo-Gospel of Thomas as does Dan Brown in "The DaVinci Code."

The "Gospel of Thomas appears out of no where in late third century; it is never quoted by Polycarp nor any of the early Church Fathers. Scholars such as Philip Schaft, Robert Baker, William Estep and dozens of others have written volumes and volumes quoting the Early Church Fathers. Surely you were trained in Seminary to know that the Canon of Scripture was confirmed by manuscripts, writings of early church fathers and translations, and none of these give authenticity to the so-called Gnostic Gospels. There are no manuscripts, no quotes, and no translations. The Gnostic Gospel of Thomas failed every one of those test for canonicity and other tests such as historical roots, contents and eye witness. Those living eighteen hundred years ago knew what was accepted Scripture and what was not.

You act as if you are ignorant of these things. These lay people are confronted by these attacks on a daily basis. If you read any apologetics from such men as Bernard Ramn who is no fundamentalist nor is F. F. Bruce, all of these vain attacks on the Scriptures would be answered for you. I would challenge you or anyone to go on ebay to purchase  copies of Josh McDowell's "New Evidence That Demands a Verdict" or Norman Geisler's "Christian Apologetics" or Michael Penny's "The Bible: Myth or Message." These are classic attacks you make and are easily refuted by these scholars and many others. I take you have never read the refutations of your arguments. If you have, why do you keep publishing them as if they are new and have not been destroyed time and again? If you have read them, you are being intellectually dishonest. Even my high school youth who write English papers using comparison and contrast must give both sides of the arguments. It is not honest to act as if each of these have not been refuted time and again.

You write on a liberal political blog because you are almost sure there will be no one with the least of formal training in Christian theology to able to refute your attacks. I call them silly from your and my stand because we both know they have been refuted time and again over hundreds of years. You bring them up as if they have never been considered before you wrote them out on this blog and that makes them silly.

But offended? You are not attacking me. You are attacking the Holy Scriptures. If there is no God of the Scriptures as you claim, then there is really no one to offend; however, if there is a God of the Scriptures and the Scriptures are what Christ claimed them to be and the Scriptures are what they claim to be as the written Word of God, I would venture you are offending that God; He is well capable of defending Himself. You need to know that we all shall give an answer to Him for every idle word we speak. You will not answer to me, but to Him. John the Beloved said if anyone adds to the Holy Scriptures or takes away from them, his name would be taken out of the Book of Life. I do not know all that means, but I would be careful. You may have to face Him in eternity someday.

 

by pratliff94 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 940 comments) on Monday, July 2, 2007 at 10:12:30 AM
 

 

15 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Loserville: Obama Is Channeling Kerry and Gore by Dave Lindorff

Are you ready for nuclear war? by Paul Craig Roberts

Fresh New Discovery - Can You Guess What This Photo Is? by Meryl Ann Butler

"Caroline: Pull a Cheney!" An Open Letter to Caroline Kennedy (head of the Obama VP search team) Posted by Stephen Fox

NSA MAY BE READING WINDOWS SOFTWARE IN YOUR COMPUTER by Sherwood Ross

The REAL John McCain by Mike Kuykendall

Mr. Bill: "OH NO, Fix the coast you broke, Shell Oil!" by Georgianne Nienaber

Russia to US: Checkmate! by William Helbig

New Zogby/Reuters Poll: Obama Down 5, in an Almost Perfect Storm by Rob Kall

Whatever Happened to the Anger On the Left? by Marc McDonald

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Links
Diaries Members
Polls Events
All  
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails