 |
|
Group(s): Benicia ProgressivesAdd to My Group
|
September 16, 2007 at 10:07:33
Is Peace or Impeachment Possible? by David Swanson Page 1 of 5 page(s) 
|
|
 
|
[Remarks at September 15, 2007, impeachment rally in Miami, Fla., organized by www.floridaimpeach.org ] It's great to see such a crowd and so many groups represented. I especially want to thank Veterans for Peace. Dave Cline was a great leader and will be badly missed. We should all go out and do as much as he did with his admirable life. On a lighter note, I went to a party yesterday in Washington, D.C. You might think we have very little to celebrate, but this was a party to say goodbye and good riddance to Alberto Gonzales! You won’t hear much about it on the news, but a bill had been introduced in July to impeach Gonzales, and it was gaining support during the August recess. In fact a bunch of Congress Members added their names to the list of cosponsors this month even though Gonzales had already announced his resignation. This was not the first time that an effort to impeach helped force out an unjust attorney general. An effort to impeach Richard Nixon forced him out as well. An effort to impeach Harry Truman led to the Supreme Court checking his abuses of power. In fact the threat of impeachment is usually enough to restore a level of justice and democracy in Washington, D.C. A promise not to impeach, on the other hand, tends to encourage abuses of power and is itself an unconstitutional abuse of power.
I wanted to mention Gonzo's departure because it's the only good news I have. None of the policies that Gonzales advanced have been reversed, and we are unlikely to see an honest attorney general assume office anytime soon. Nine of the 10 articles of our Bill of Rights are in tatters. And they don't make us house soldiers in our homes (which is our tenth and sole remaining right) because they tax us to pay for barracks and bases in this country, plus dozens of permanent military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, and in fact about 1,000 permanent bases in nations all over the world. We have lost the right not to be detained and held without charge, the right not to be tortured, and the right not to be spied on in our homes. We have lost the World Trade Center, a piece of the Pentagon, and the city of New Orleans. We have moved dangerously close to the point of no turning back on global warming. We have encouraged the proliferation of weapons around the world, driven much of the world to hate our nation, and watched a general this week brag to Congress about how many weapons we are selling to Iraq. But the term "we" now refers to the private companies that will profit from the weapons sales, the private companies that our grandchildren will pay for the reconstruction of Iraq that never happened, and the private companies we enrich every time we stop at a gas station. We have lost the right to organize a labor union, and we are rapidly losing the right to protest. We are penned into Orwellian free speech zones or arrested for holding a sign on a street corner. Should a catastrophe hit the US, everything is in place for martial law. And while it cannot find the decency to hold Bush administration outlaws in contempt, our Congress holds peace activists in contempt of Congress, when the Capitol Police don't tackle and beat them in the halls of Congress. Well, I've got news for you. Not only is there a huge march and civil disobedience action today in Washington for peace and impeachment, but we are ready to hold Congress in contempt of the citizens of the United States of America.
Yesterday a second study was published. There have now been two studies done of how many Iraqis have died violent deaths as a result of our invasion and occupation of their country. The first was done by Johns Hopkins over a year ago and has been updated by Just Foreign Policy. The second was done by a well-respected British organization. The results of each study fall within the margin of error of the other. We are responsible for the deaths of between 1.1 and 1.3 million Iraqis. Another 4 million Iraqis out of a population of 25 million have been displaced from their homes, half of them to other countries. Most Iraqis lack adequate water and electricity. Half the nation needs emergency assistance. A quarter of the children are malnourished. And more than that number are traumatized and filled with hatred. A majority of Iraqis say things are getting worse and want the US occupation ended. The progress General Petraeus talks about not only is based on numbers he won't explain, not only is based on claims disputed by numerous other sources, but it's also progress that the Iraqi people haven't seen.
Make no mistake, the occupation is a bigger disaster for Iraqis, for our troops, and for our safety each year and each month that passes. We're dropping five times the bombs this year as last year, including 30 tons of cluster bombs in the first six months of 2007. If Bush and Cheney had unlimited troops, they would send another half million to Iraq. And the Iraqi people would still not be pacified. Bush is bringing a minimal number of troops home for only one reason. He has to. He has no more troops to send. This is not a victory for Petraeus or for Congress. This is a victory for the counter-recruitment movement. If you want to make a difference, go to schools and tell kids the truth about military service. Get a book called "Army of None."
Nothing in Iraq is getting better, and nothing is about to get better. Petraeus is arming one religious sect to kill another and measuring success by body counts. Every body he counts is 10 friends and relatives eager to kill the occupiers. This is not a war that can be won or lost. It is an occupation and a crime, and we must stop committing it! According to Republicans in Congress the real danger lies in people who would dare question the authority of a general. I set up a website called BetrayUsReport.com, so I must be part of the real problem. But then so must Petraeus's boss, Admiral Fallon, who calls him (and you'll have to excuse me, but these are his words), "an ass kissing little chicken shit."
Somehow the Bush White House seems to attract an unfair share of ass kissing little chicken shits. I watched Bush's speech the other night on ABC, in which Bush admitted, as his report yesterday effectively admitted, that none of the so-called benchmarks had been met. Senator Reed gave a good but vague and non-committal Democratic response. And then George Stephanopoulos of ABC, something of an ass-kissing little chicken shit himself, came on and immediately explained what it all meant. He didn't remind anyone of all the promises Bush had made back in January. Instead he announced that the Democrats can talk about ending the so-called war but cannot do anything about it because they don't have 67 Democrats in the Senate.
Let's get one thing straight: that is a lie. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid can announce tomorrow and could have announced nine months, several hundred troops, and tens of thousands of Iraqis ago, that they will not bring up any more bills to fund the occupation. A Republican proposal to fund the occupation could be blocked by 41, not 67, Senators. The Democrats could also pass bills ending the occupation or funding only the withdrawal and have them vetoed and pass them again and again. This is no secret and there is no dispute that Congress has this power. Senator Feingold held hearings at the start of the year at which experts overwhelmingly agreed that Congress can simply stop providing funding. Bush has plenty of money to bring the troops home, and Congress can provide new money for that purpose.
Congress can provide funds for the reconstruction of Iraq by Iraqis. Congress can encourage the United Nations and the Arab League to organize transition efforts. Congress can ban the use of any funds for an attack on Iran. It's only a question of will.
There's no question of where the public stands. Democrats.com which I work for commissioned a polling company this week to ask the public what it wanted.
Forty percent said they wanted all troops home in 6 months, using existing fund to do it.
Another 14 percent want them home in 6 months and will pay $50 billion to make it happen.
Another 19 percent want them home in a year and will pay $200 billion for it.
And 13 percent want what Congress is considering doing, giving Bush another $200 billion with no strings attached.
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Impeach Now
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 9 comments |
|
The single finest article I have read in my time here
I thought that every word glowed with the inner light of truth and moral outrage and I applaud you most vigorously for writing them. Not only have you put the lie of a powerless Democratic Party to rest ( hello you defenders of democratic complicity and incompetence, where are your rebuttals to these truths? C'mon Andy, c'mon Steve you know who you are!) but you nailed the only real course of action open to us: "We can shut down the city of Washington. The next big march is on the 29th, following a camp in front of the Capitol from the 22nd to the 29th. If we bring a million people and on the 29th refuse to leave, if we block the streets and fill the jails, all bets and probably all wars are off. " by ardee D. (6 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 2377 comments) on Sunday, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:56:02 AM  (0+)
|
|
Thank you, David
David Swanson has consistently shown vast insight, extraordinary grasp of the facts, clarity that I see nowhere else, an unyielding tenacity to genuine human values, a profound understand of government process, courage, and a magical quality of appearing with ideas and even physically at critical times and places. I recommend that when you see his byline, you read or at least skim the article. You won't be disappointed. And if I ever see David's name on a ballot, rest assurred that he will get my vote. by Daniel Geery (26 articles, 95 quicklinks, 126 diaries, 912 comments [26 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Sep 16, 2007 at 12:17:14 PM (0+)
|
|
I'd like unexpressed Excuse #16 addressed:
"I need to be included in the regime of the Feuhrer, when the Congress that I'm currently a part of, is disbanded. I don't have any other career prospects, and I have to think of the welfare of my family." by lenngray (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 77 comments) on Sunday, Sep 16, 2007 at 1:40:50 PM (0+)
|
|
Reply: Well lenngray................................
I kinda look at it like this...............you should've thought about your familiy before you chose Congress as a career.............walking a straight line and upholding the Law are prerequisits of these type positions................I suggest if you can't take the heat...........then it's time you get out of the kitchen......................................no sympathy here....... by Ernest (0 articles, 8 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 221 comments [40 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:54:22 AM (0+)
|
|
Thank you. Totally timely ...
Something is up with posting OpEd News links all day today and so I've had to leave them out in order to post anything here .. The new nomination of the creepy Michael Mukasey has me riled. Maybe WORSE than Alito, which really got my goat back in the day .. I was posting everyone I knew to WARN Them what would happen in that case. What annoys me is how hard it is to dig out anything about him, as the urls proliferate like mad about his Jose Padillo bs .. and I am positive there is much more . and we must make certain it ALL comes to light, as this appointment may be hard to stop without exposing his entire "polical" stance,l as the right wingers are already setting up scenario that says "he may be political, but he'll up hold the Constitution" .. As we can see, he put the last of the 10 civil rights up for cancellation .. There appears to be nothing BuZh&Co. does that doesn't have a very hidden agenda. So what is it here ..? I've had trouble with OpEd News links all day, and so have my ebuddies. If people find other interesting links on this, perhaps they could post them here iffen they can....? I meant to write on this topic for OpEd today .. as this is so highly troubling. More is going on than meets the eye ... by ladybroadoak (39 articles, 20 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 394 comments) on Sunday, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:20:23 PM (0+)
|
|
#12
#12 - well, you see, we're (us so-called representatives of the people) all are kind of guilty because we really don't give a fat-rat's-ass about all you piss-ant peasants. You Cindy Sheehans, Michael Moores, Charlie Sheens, Sean Penns or any of you other David Swansons out there can think say or do anything as long as you don't get in our way. For we will kill you and get away with it. For you see we're nothing but shills for the ones that have their hands up our butts like so many hand puppets telling us what to say. It took Monks burning themselves to death in front of the White House last time things got bad. Things are much worse now. Now what will it take? by Mr M (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 66 diaries, 2845 comments [654 recommended, 27 rejected]) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:47:43 AM (0+)
|
|
In fact the threat of impeachment is usually enough to resto
This is an important quote. "In fact the threat of impeachment is usually enough to restore a level of justice and democracy in Washington, D.C. A promise not to impeach, on the other hand, tends to encourage abuses of power and is itself an unconstitutional abuse of power." I spent September 15 writing to 5 congressmen on behalf of the IMPEACH FOR PEACE campaign http://impeachforpeace.org/ImpeachNow.html. I recommend we all write them and our own local congressmen and send letters to newspapers or put them on line--plus speak out in front of all local media! by ALONE (196 articles, 1 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 557 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 3:44:33 AM (0+)
|
|
I POSTED THIS COMMENT TO MY LOCAL NEWSPAPER JUST NOW!
This morning I was reading David Swanson's brilliantly argued IS PEACE OR IMPEACHMENT POSSIBLE?--a piece on the ability, need and requirement for our congressmen to impeach the president and vice-president. If interested, you can read it youself at OP-ED. One of his better arguments by Swanson is that: "You won't hear much about it on the news, but a bill had been introduced in July to impeach Gonzales, and it was gaining support during the August recess. In fact a bunch of Congress Members added their names to the list of cosponsors this month even though Gonzales had already announced his resignation. This was not the first time that an effort to impeach helped force out an unjust attorney general. An effort to impeach Richard Nixon forced him out as well. An effort to impeach Harry Truman led to the Supreme Court checking his abuses of power. In fact the threat of impeachment is usually enough to restore a level of justice and democracy in Washington, D.C. A promise not to impeach, on the other hand, tends to encourage abuses of power and is itself an unconstitutional abuse of power." I believe that if we don't stop this warring president and his side-kick or manipulator, Dick Cheney, our grandchildren and their grandchildren will cry out in dismay: "Granddaddy, why didn't anyone stop those guys from lying, leading the country to their unthought out wars and destroying our precious consitution and country?" ALL REAL AMERICANS AND TRUE CONGRESSMEN NEED TO GET ON THE BANDWAGON OF HISTORY--IMPEACH THE LIARS AND MANIPULATORS NOW!!!! get everyone else in the USA to follow suit! by ALONE (196 articles, 1 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 557 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 4:13:01 AM (0+)
|
|
A Suggestion
Great Article, Thank you! I have a suggestion that might, just might have an impact. If we can spread the word, "No Dem Donations in October" To let these jokers know how many of us, simply want an investigation, if they are impeached, great, but at least try. They are dying for $$$$$ if enough people STOP donating they will listen. Cheers by LickBush (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 19 comments) on Monday, Sep 17, 2007 at 5:15:22 PM (0+)
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article? 
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
