Is Peace or Impeachment Possible?

The idea of making Cheney in particular an object of sympathy may seem ludicrous.  But then so did the idea that Saddam Hussein was about to attack us with unmanned aerial vehicles.  Common sense is not enough in Washington.  We need hard numbers.  I think Congress should start with Cheney and watch as Republicans are forced to abandon him.  The Republicans would have done this to the Democrats years ago.  The idea that impeachment would help Bush and Cheney originated in Republican National Committee talking points published in May 2006.  Pelosi immediately adopted the idea as her own.  It flies in the face of the historical record.  When the Republicans have moved impeachment, as against Truman for example, they've benefited at the polls.  When the Democrats tried to impeach Nixon, who was popular compared to Cheney or Bush, they won huge victories.  When they promised not to impeach Reagan, they lost in the next elections.  The exceptional case is the Clinton impeachment which was uniquely unpopular.  Nonetheless, the Republicans hung onto both houses of Congress and the White House.  In fact, they lost very few seats, fewer than is the norm at that point in the tenure of a majority in Congress.  The Democrats may be risking more by not impeaching than they would be by doing it.  But unless we can get polls done in swing districts that show overwhelmingly that the Democrats will lose seats by not impeaching, they are unlikely to act.  This is what their staffers tell me.  And polls showing they'd gain seats by impeaching may not be enough, if they think they'd do OK without it.  And we'll have to show that Republicans save their seats by backing impeachment if we want any Republicans to act.  Of course this is all utterly disgusting.  Human life and the future of democracy are not concerns that even come up.  It's all about elections.

Excuse #13:  Impeachment would remind people of Bill Clinton. 

Well, would that be so horrible?  I was no fan of Bill Clinton, but compared to Bush and Cheney he looks like a saint. 

Excuse #14:  Nancy Pelosi opposes impeachment.

Excuse #15:  Hillary Clinton opposes impeachment.

The way we bring them around is to show that the Democrats have a better chance at the White House as the party with backbone and integrity than as the party that just isn't the Republicans. 

So, what can we do? 

Raise your hand if to get rid of Bush you'd do for him what Monica did for Bill. 

Nine patriotic Americans!  Thank you!

OK.  May not be needed.  There's a saying that goes like this:  let's save our pessimism for better times. 

We cannot afford the luxury of pessimism.  While there are things Congress refuses to even consider, like ending the occupation or impeaching Cheney or Bush, there are also things that we as citizens have a responsibility to consider but rarely do.  We can shut down our Congress members' offices with endless repeated sit-ins.  We can make it impossible for them to work.  That changes the whole calculation.  We can shut down the city of Washington.  The next big march is on the 29th, following a camp in front of the Capitol from the 22nd to the 29th.  If we bring a million people and on the 29th refuse to leave, if we block the streets and fill the jails, all bets and probably all wars are off. 

 Whether we can manage such feats or not, if we keep building and pushing an impeachment movement, not only do we communicate to the world our good intentions, but we are prepared should some new event help trigger a pulse in the corpse of Congress.  And let us hope that event is not an attack on Iran. 

 We can also organize in and do polling in swing districts to try to show the electoral advantage to be gained from doing the right thing. 

 We can also keep pressuring key Congress members like Congressman Wexler and Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz.  We can do this through local media activism, PR, letters to editors, calls to shows, through visits, phone calls, emails, faxes, letters, post cards, posters, billboards, through honk-to-impeach events where you hold posters saying "Honk to Impeach" at the side of the street outside their offices, and through events where we sit in and read the Constitution aloud, refusing to leave. 

 We can also take our demands directly to the people Congress listens to:  the media.  The fact is that if we had had Fox News and if the other outlets had been in 1974 what they are now, Nixon would never have resigned.  Today, the media do not cover the crimes, the evidence, or the public outrage, and do not poll the public's opinions on impeachment.  We forced the Downing Street minutes into the news two-and-a-half years ago by flooding the media with phone calls, emails, and protests in their lobbies.  That needs to continue. 

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5