Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (28 comments)

Keith Olbermann's Special Comment - "You Sir, Have No Business Being President!"

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)
Page 1 of 5 page(s)

opednews.com


Full Transcript: (Via MSNBC)

Finally, as promised, a Special Comment about the President’s cataclysmic deception about Iran.

There are few choices more terrifying than the one Mr.. Bush has left us with tonight.

We have either a president who is too dishonest to restrain himself from invoking World War Three about Iran at least six weeks after he had to have known that the analogy would be fantastic, irresponsible hyperbole — or we have a president too transcendently stupid not to have asked — at what now appears to have been a series of opportunities to do so — whether the fairy tales he either created or was fed, were still even remotely plausible.

A pathological presidential liar, or an idiot-in-chief. It is the nightmare scenario of political science fiction: A critical juncture in our history and, contained in either answer, a president manifestly unfit to serve, and behind him in the vice presidency: an unapologetic war-monger who has long been seeing a world visible only to himself.

After Ms Perino’s announcement from the White House late last night, the timeline is inescapable and clear.

In August the President was told by his hand-picked Major Domo of intelligence Mike McConnell, a flinty, high-strung-looking, worrying-warrior who will always see more clouds than silver linings, that what “everybody thought” about Iran might be, in essence, crap.

Yet on October 17th the President said of Iran and its president Ahmadinejad:

“I’ve told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War Three, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from have the knowledge to make a nuclear weapon.”

And as he said that, Mr.. Bush knew that at bare minimum there was a strong chance that his rhetoric was nothing more than words with which to scare the Iranians.

Or was it, Sir, to scare the Americans?

Does Iran not really fit into the equation here? Have you just scribbled it into the fill-in-the-blank on the same template you used, to scare us about Iraq?

In August, any commander-in-chief still able-minded or uncorrupted or both, Sir, would have invoked the quality the job most requires: mental flexibility.

A bright man, or an honest man, would have realized no later than the McConnell briefing that the only true danger about Iran was the damage that could be done by an unhinged, irrational Chicken Little of a president, shooting his mouth off, backed up by only his own hysteria and his own delusions of omniscience.

Not Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Mr. Bush.

The Chicken Little of presidents is the one, Sir, that you see in the mirror.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

http://politicalbyline.blogspot.com/

Just an Independent Writer

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
28 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Keith speaks truth to power by Charlie L on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 10:44:15 AM
What is the evidence Iran had a nuke weapons program? by Better World Order on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:34:39 AM
nooky-oular by JackN on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 1:58:25 PM
and its eye-gor too by ardee D. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 2:03:58 PM
Re: Keith Olbermann's Special Comment by Munich on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:55:49 AM
MSNBC holds out on America by zephyr on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 3:16:41 PM
Do you know who owns NBC? by Mr M on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 3:37:34 PM
As do many others... by Chuck Adkins on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 4:29:17 PM
Re: Keith Olbermann's Special Comment by Munich on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 4:37:52 PM
Keith, What if the report is WRONG??? by steve scheetz on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 5:47:16 PM
assumptions made with insufficient evidence by ardee D. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 2:11:46 PM
Re: Keith Olbermann's Special Comment by Munich on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 8:58:02 PM
Amen! by Chuck Adkins on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 9:04:06 PM
They attack Iraq regularly by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007 at 2:28:29 PM
Olbermann's Special Comment, by vincent passiatore on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 10:11:09 PM
Only one thing to say.... by truthtruffle on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 10:36:40 PM
That almost sounds like Keith by Scott on Friday, Dec 7, 2007 at 11:18:01 PM
Re: Keith Olbermann's Special Comment by Munich on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 12:15:08 AM
I know what I comprehend by Scott on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 12:19:35 AM
How is it that O'Reilly handles Dubya? by Kevin Gosztola on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 12:43:13 AM
Great Scott! by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 9:16:38 AM
That's experience? by Scott on Saturday, Dec 8, 2007 at 11:41:05 PM
How do those sour grapes taste? by ardee D. on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 10:03:07 AM
Who's pissed off? by Scott on Sunday, Dec 9, 2007 at 4:36:30 PM
Olbermann is the Clark Kent of network news. by Pleru on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 8:07:35 AM
You're not paying attention by Scott on Monday, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:24:56 PM
It is really funny by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Dec 12, 2007 at 1:52:20 PM
What?? by steve scheetz on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 9:24:25 AM