Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
21 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

9/11: UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
www.pilotsfor911truth.org

Contact: Robert Balsamo
e-mail: pilots@pilotsfor911truth.org

UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS

Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) via the Freedom of Information Act to obtain United Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder information, consisting of a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file and Flight Path Animation, allegedly derived from Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder (FDR). The data provided by the NTSB contradict observed events in several significant ways:

  1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations.
  2. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times.
  3. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt.
  4. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion.  
  5. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests.

In May, 2007, members of Pilots for 9/11 Truth received these documents from the NTSB and began a close analysis of the data they contain. After expert review and cross check, Pilots for 9/11 Truth has concluded that the information in these NTSB documents does not support, and in some instances factually contradicts, the official government position that United Airlines Flight 93 created the impact crater as reported, in Somerset County, PA on the morning of September 11, 2001. According to the US Govt, United Airlines Flight 93 approached Somerset County from the North-Northwest at a high altitude on the morning of September 11, 2001.  However, many witnesses contradict altitude as well as approach path. Also according to reports, and as the impact crater suggests, United Airlines Flight 93 impacted terrain at an almost vertical 90 degree angle, while the Flight Data Recorder shows a 35 degree angle with up-sloping terrain, further reducing impact angle.

The information provided by the US Government does not support reports of United Airlines Flight 93 approach, impact angles, and lack of jet fuel at Somerset Country, PA.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth is committed to discovering the truth surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 . We have contacted both the NTSB and the FBI regarding these and other inconsistencies. To date, they have refused to comment on, correct, refute, retract or offer side-letters that might explain the discrepancies between what they claim are the data extracted from the FDR of United Flight 93 and the events observed. As concerned citizens and professionals in the aviation industry, Pilots for 9/11 Truth asks, why have these discrepancies not been addressed by agencies within the United States Government? Pilots for 9/11 Truth takes the position that an official government inquiry into these discrepancies is warranted and long overdue. We call upon our fellow citizens to write to their Congressional representatives to inform them of these discrepancies and call for an immediate investigation into this matter. For more information and in depth analysis please visit pilotsfor911truth.org.

Members of Pilots For 9/11 Truth at http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html

 

Co-Founder Of Pilots For 9/11 Truth
Member List
Individual Citations
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

9/11: Flight Recorder Analysis - Wikipedia Displays Blatant Disinformation Once Again

9/11: United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To ATC/Radar

9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE

9/11: UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS

9/11: The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irreconcilable with the Official Reports and Data

9/11: Speeds Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 21 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

My apologies for the font. It didnt look like that... by rob balsamo on Sunday, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:32:40 AM
Fixed.. :-)... by rob balsamo on Sunday, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:39:01 AM
There's a mountain of evidence confirming that... by Alan Williams on Sunday, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:27:36 PM
There is a mountain of evidence that an aircraft w... by ken on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:18:24 PM
Ken: 1) The impact hole is too small. Based on wha... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:21:40 AM
Ken: 1) The impact hole is too small.Based on what... by ken on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:47:17 PM
Excellent article.  Wonder when the truth wil... by lucydavis on Sunday, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:34:52 PM
The Warren Commision?  What are you talking a... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:12:14 AM
Good work! Of course, the fact that debris wa... by Nordic on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:15:45 AM
You better check your map, Indian lake is only 1.5... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:25:40 AM
...and google "New Baltimore+Flight 93".... by rob balsamo on Friday, May 2, 2008 at 1:45:05 AM
In any turbofan there is a massive tempered steel ... by john riggs on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:29:55 PM
Your point is a major one. There is NO reason for ... by ken on Monday, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:03:06 PM
Titanium turbine blades never shatter?... by Roark Howard on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:10:49 AM
The engines are 10' long 7' wide and weigh... by ken on Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:35:27 AM
The FBI claims that it recovered 95 percent of the... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:41:45 AM
Ken:(4) The atmospheric smoke of the impact was li... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:44:58 AM
Multiple witnesses at the Shanksville site reporte... by Roark Howard on Wednesday, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:02:07 AM
I intend to respond to these few posts and after t... by ken on Wednesday, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:06:28 AM
"Why are you so convinced that they did not r... by ken on Wednesday, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:15:27 AM
It truly is refreshing to see someone who has done... by rob balsamo on Friday, May 2, 2008 at 2:00:07 AM