The entire coverup of 9/11 truth and maintenance of all the lies has been a bipartisan effort.  Democrats in Congress have refused to demand and face the truth.  Why?  Because they fear massive loss of public confidence in the federal government when the truth emerges and the inevitable loss of government stability.  They fear that 9/11 truth will be the precipitating event for the much needed Second American Revolution....

by Joel S. Hirschhorn (141 articles, 50 quicklinks, 65 diaries, 546 comments [2 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 1:29:59 PM

  (0+)

9/11 Truth is the only eye-opening kick-in-the-ass capable of awakening the entire hord of anesthesized consumers of MSM propaganda-lies into this nightmarish reality and pushing them out into the open to demand urgent impeachment and removal of the bastards who have terrorized the entire planet in the name of a phony 'war on terror'. Truth and Divine Justice always prevails; and this time the sooner the better to ward off a third World War that is looming so ominously in the horizon.

by ramsheyi (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 793 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 3:09:06 PM

  (0+)

there is no more important historic crosshair to centre upon than the focus of the intellectual proffessorial community toward the physical facts of the destruction of these three buildings. the ramifications of that dark days work and the obvious nature of it changed the global situation forever, and much for the worse. has left the ideas of 'justice' and 'investigation' flapping in some very cold and lonesome winds.

To rest upon the official commission report leaves us as laughing stock to a ridiculous manipulation and, further, is insulting . everytime persons of knowledge voice 'concerns' over this awfull enterprise, adds help to prise another from inertia-- and we all know how fast things can come down with alittle bit of help.

by remo (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 96 comments [37 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 4:00:45 PM

  (0+)

It's not if but when now. This crime was simply too big to covered-up forever.

I don't care who gets hurt in exposing 9/11. If our system of government has failed us then it's time we found a new one. But I don't think it has to go the far. The Constitution is a solid document to re-build upon. What is needed is a complete restructuring of the wealth and how wealth is used.

Our country has been taken over by people that value profit over all else and see war as the best tool in gaining more wealth, power and control. The Constitution and the people mean nothing to the sub-humans. Greed is their creed, compassion never enters the picture. Soulless bottom-lines are blood-lines to the heartless perpetrators of this horrendous crime and these sub-human cretins deserve whatever punishment rendered.

Once the truth is known we can then cleanse the world of those that would have destroyed it in their blind attempt to have conquered it.

by Mr M (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 66 diaries, 2845 comments [654 recommended, 27 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 5:27:11 PM

  (0+)

boomerang

The Saga Continues... READ GLOBAL ANALYSIS REPORT AT: http://www.worldreports.org/news/106_bush_sr._will_be_shot_dead_if_caught_stealing_again 'BUSH SR. WILL BE SHOT DEAD IF CAUGHT STEALING AGAIN'  MASSIVE SUMS FOUND IN TOP OFFICIAL CRIMINALS’ SECRET CITIBANK ACCOUNTS Thursday 13 December 2007 07:06 Because the coordinated statements by the leading central banks have presented this cooperative venture as a means of providing the tense short-term funding markets with additional liquidity over the end-year period, the ‘mainstream’ press has been misled into believing that this new initiative by four of the world's leading central banks, has a benevolent purpose. Wrong. The purpose of this operation is to provide the criminal financial operatives – and we name them specifically: George Bush Sr., George Bush Jr., Robert Rubin, Henry M. Paulson, Vice President Cheney, Former President Clinton and Mrs Hillary Rodinski Clinton – with cover so that they can continue, with Citibank, to steal and exploit Ambassador Wanta’s $4.5 trillion Settlement fund. Report Continues...

by boomerang (0 articles, 7 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 556 comments [215 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 5:54:01 PM

  (0+)

oops again

by Mr M (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 66 diaries, 2845 comments [654 recommended, 27 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 5:28:21 PM

  (0+)

Ok everybody, put on the thinking caps and let's figure out if Planes were used or not that day. Photo's prove that flight 77 could not have hit the Pentagon, I believe that. I also do not believe that 93 crashed in Pennsylvania. No bodies, no blood was even found at the site.  Now if these two planes were fake, then how about the two used on the WTC?

We know the towers were demolished with explosives, and having building 7 pulled. So what about the planes? What about the passengers? Where did they go? All the evidence that we have to bring about criminal proceedings, we still have the big question of what about the passengers? Where did they go?  If we can solve this piece of the puzzle, we will have the complete picture.

Were those people really on those planes that day? Are there any common connections between all four flights? I heard most of the people on flight 77 worked at the Pentagon. But what about the other flights?

I finally have a grasp on the truth that DOES put the picture together and that is this website http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html

Read it folks, and think about it. It makes sense. It is real, and the pieces fit for the first time for me. Alan I wish you would look at this and tell us what you think. I believe this to be a viable conclusion.

by Dom Jermano (20 articles, 0 quicklinks, 40 diaries, 930 comments) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 6:37:24 PM

  (0+)

And everyone else working on this most critical topic.

In spite of what Noam Chomsky has said--that the truth of 9/11 doesn't matter (Noam, what the hell are you thinking on that one, btw?)--I don't see any single issue that even comes close in importance, insofar as exposing how the American people have been duped--and how damn dumb they continue to be.

All we ask is that 2 + 2 = 4. Is that too much? I think not.

by Daniel Geery (26 articles, 95 quicklinks, 126 diaries, 912 comments [26 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 6:52:56 PM

  (0+)

Unfortunately, two plus two is not that easy for people who have never understood what it means to think for one's self.

This crime will stand until someone figures out a way to crack the mainstream media's stranglehold on the topic.

by Bill Cain (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 434 comments [67 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:46:42 PM

  (0+)

   I am encouraged by recent progress, but also concerned about the following.  In recent months it seems as though there has been a media disinformation campaign to make it SEEM like those who want 9/11 truth are EXCLUSIVELY on the right followers of Alex Jones etc.  Recently I have also noticed articles trying to argue that the 9/11 movement as  a whole is anti-semitic etc.  

by Nathaniel Heidenheimer (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 47 comments) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 7:54:16 PM

  (0+)

Please tell us what an Alex Jones type is, and what  it is about Alex Jones that compromises the 9-11 Truth movement.

by Bill Cain (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 434 comments [67 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:50:08 PM

  (0+)

You don't say in your piece "what specifically do these 'learned' men object to? The physical way the buildings collapsed? The sequence of factors that caused the buildings to fail? Who was responsible the design, the builders, the architects’ greedy son in law’s cost cutting (a’la Towering Inferno)?  Do they all disagree on the same point(s)? Was the event orchestrated by someone else other than Al Qaeda? What? Where is their peer released proof? And what does the peer reviews say. I could claim that Clinton/ GWB are alien clones the originals are locked up in Roswell. This has the same weight until there is real proof! Noam Chomsky is right. Money be damned "SHOW US THE FACTS." There is simply not enough proof to make any other provable conclusion.

Until there is I suggest that America have a fund to buy bricks to build a bridge and get over it. There are more important things to worry about Children without health cover, Millions of adults without health cover. Lives are at stake here.

There seems to be an American obsession with conspiracies from the killings of JFK, Martin Luther King jr, to the where-a-bouts of Elvis to aliens.

Perspective folks, perspective. The US has played right in to the terrorists hand US has become more paranoid and reactionary……solidifying the world's view of America.

Consider what the ex presidential advisor said some thing similar to this on TV down under. “ We shouldn’t be frightened by events  in the newspapers because by definition they are sensational, ratings grabbing ….and… relatively rare. It’s what’s not in the news that should concern us 4000 people died tragically in 9/11 but we (US) loses 40000 people each year to road toll, 20000 to Breast Cancer and a similar amount to prostate cancer. !00000’s to obesity & 500000 per year to smoking related diseases. Do we spend Trillions on declaring war on General Motors, or Toyota or on tobacco companies…no….Should we be concern about terrorism yes ...”. He went on to say America should be wary not terrified. The Brits lost 100000's to the Blitz but they went on with life why can't America . The attack that proved that the all mighty United States Or America is vulnerable after all? Perhaps an article at another time. 

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 8:09:51 PM

  (0+)

A new slogan for ex-911Truthers - "I support the brick/bridge initiative". 

by Tom Murphy (3 articles, 5 quicklinks, 16 diaries, 2100 comments [55 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 2:36:57 PM

  (0+)

The terror and carnage of 9/11 was the result of ongoing and escalating tensions within the religion of Islam and has nothing to do with being "duped" by the U.S. government. Through his perceived successes with the Afghan jihad in driving out the Soviets, Osama bin Laden believed that his message of Islam was THE message of Islam. The benefits of jihad are that it (1) radicalized a religious conviction further and (2) short-circuited the need to do the political yet time consuming work needed to change a governing process. The later is especially handy when installing a theocracy that's not overly concerned with the people's representation. As the only "true" message, it could, should, MUST be exported to other Islamic countries that had lost their own religious convictions. The increasingly authoritarian regimes in the Middle East that aligned themselves with the West and imprisoned fellow Muslims for speaking their convictions only fueled bin Laden's belief that radical change was warranted. Couple this belief with America's steadfast support of Israel, including the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, and it was just a matter of time before bin Laden and America would meet or... clash. That clash took the form of his call for jihad against the "defilers of Islam". In particular, these were the Americans and others that were permitted by the royal family to stage in Saudi Arabia in response to Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Both of these actions were affronts to Islam or so thought bin Laden. The benefit, though, to focusing on America and the West is that it shifted the jihad's battle from a near enemy (in the form of authoritarian but Islamic regimes) to a far enemy (American infidels occupying the holy lands). Remember, this is the ideology that controlled a very large portion of the world between the 7th and 15th centuries. No small feat in those days. Were it once had the power it glory, should it not have it again provided they remain a pure ideology? America, as the world's only superpower and perceived "bully" to Arab countries as it related to oil production and Israel's existence (e.g., Camp David Peace Accords), needed to taste the "humiliation" that Islam had felt for generations under the yoke of the West and its imperialist conquests (England and France especially and the dividing of the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th Century) since the 15th century. While occasional nips at the Beast (e.g., Lebanon 1982, Somalia 1993, WTC 1993, African embassies in 1998, and the U.S.S. Cole in 2000) exemplified that it could bleed, the American "paper tiger" that always ran from past confrontations needed to be put in its place once and for all. His deep-set contempt for America and belief that it would run once again and away from the Middle East was the strategic flaw made by bin Laden with regard to permitting the 9/11 attacks. This strategy, meant to teach the Americans about humiliation, backfired and threatened al-Qaeda's very existence. The continued problem with bin Laden is that his message of truth that refocuses Muslim attention on matters of faith conflicts directly with the vast yet silent majority of Muslims, desiring peace with the West. In a way, 9/11 was the result of silent Islamic infighting and the religion's inability to reconcile who its "true" leaders were and are today. Are the leaders fundamentalist Muslims that focus on the sword phrases of the Quran or are they more moderate voices that focus on the peaceful wording of the Text? For the victims of 9/11 and the unfurling of the wrath of bin Laden's "paper tiger", the answer to that question is immaterial. Although al-Qaeda gained a tactical victory with the felling of the WTC towers, it lost significantly any strategic victory. The one positive outcome for bin Laden in 9/11 is that America's reaction to the attacks and its confronting the enemy "there" rather than "here" and on American soil is that al-Qaeda's ideology and militant, jihadist response will probably far outlast its creator thereby ensuring that the inner conflict of Islam continues to burn and result in 9/11-like collateral damage. "Energy and persistence conquer all things," – Benjamin Franklin. For more: http://evatt.labor.net.au/publications/papers/76.html

by Tom Murphy (3 articles, 5 quicklinks, 16 diaries, 2100 comments [55 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 9:16:06 PM

  (0+)

and it's the story we were sold by the 9/11 Commission and the MSM. It does not exclude the possibility that bin Laden was used as a patsy by others.

See here for what the 9/11 Commission left out about Western governments and terror, click the link at the top for a full transcript of the 9/11 Omission Hearings

www.911blogger.com/node/2966 

and the Complete 9/11 Timeline made from over 5000 articles sourced exclusively from mainstream sources 

www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

and I don't believe that jet fuel fires and plane damage could've turned hundred story steel frame skyscrapers into rapidly inflating dust clouds and small piles of rubble- explosives could. 

by Better World Order (4 articles, 568 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 1110 comments [56 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:19:44 AM

  (0+)

The links were interesting – especially the timeline; I haven't seen that one until today. A note of caution when using the timeline is tied to what makes it so useful, as a reference tool. Some of the initial reports detailed in the timeline were later identified as incorrect or missing information. While the timeline does a thorough job identifying these instances, there are some areas that the 9/11 Commission Report "filled in the blanks", using their own sources.

Yes, yes – I'm aware of the CIA tape destruction and its affect on this filling. The presumption here is that either the Commission got it "right" or "wrong". I believe the Commission feels they got it "right". There are a fair number of people who disagree. I think the Commission got it mostly right with a dash of wrong thrown into the mix.

But... I've looked at the collapse of the WTC structures from a number of perspectives and have concluded (as some may know) that the NIST report got it right. An issue that is often overlooked by 911Truthers is the massive amount of energy released in a very compressed time period (a second or two at most) when the perimeter columns buckled and failed. This failure resulted in the entire mass of the floor above the points of failure to convert its potential energy into kinetic energy.

This realization and transfer of such massive amounts of energy overwhelmed the structures' ability to transfer the shifting energy loads via its static support structure - http://www.nistreview.org/WTC-REPORT-GREENING.pdf .

To see an everyday example of this sudden realization of energy (albeit on a much, much smaller scale), build a "house" of playing cards one or two stories tall and three cards wide on the sides. Then, place a brick across the topmost "roof" of the house – the brick represents the mass of "x" number of "floors" above the one or two constructed floors. Slowly (and carefully) remove some of the vertical cards and watch the brick. At some point, the house's structure is compromised and the remaining structural members cannot support the brick's load. Consequently, the brick falls mostly in the vertical and takes the remaining portions of the "house" with it; the movement of the brick from resting atop the roof to resting atop the substrate is quick and the resulting release of energy is absorbed by the fallen cards and substrate, resulting in the loud "smack" and vibration of the substrate.

Now imagine a tower of cards that consists of many floors; so many that you no longer need a brick to simulate the mass of upper floors. Do you think an impact to such a tower would bring it down in a massive release of energy? Check the link and watch the tower's failure after his hands penetrate to the "core" - click here .

While entertaining in that it illustrates a point, the card tower's failure differs from WTC 1 and 2 in that the space between the core and perimeter was not "filled" with supportive structural members - like that observed within the card tower - http://www.debunking911.com/towers.htm . Instead, the space was spanned by the horizontal spandrels or trusses that tied the core and perimeter columns together, creating essentially a tube within a tube.

The impact of the aircraft needed only to compromise (not destroy) the vertical columns of the internal support structure. The resulting fires further assisted the compromising of the structure via the weakened trusses between core and perimeter columns. With the removal from the impact of the protective spray-on fireproofing (which only grants a two-hour fire rating to start) and impingement of the fire suppression systems, the structures fates were sealed; it was just a matter of "when" they would fall; "Le jeu est fait !"

As a quick aside - has anyone ever wondered why spray-on fire proofing is even applied to exposed metal members of a structure before the perimeter walls are erected and internal partitioning begun? It's not for looks or the added weight. The application is a passive life safety feature that grants the building occupants enough time (i.e., two hours) to evacuate the structure BEFORE it can collapse. When you couple this passive feature with an active feature (e.g., a sprinkler system), both life and property are seemingly protected.

As the trusses weakened due to the heat from the fire, they expanded and pushed against the core and perimeter columns, which were still far stronger, and buckled. The result is that the trusses sagged in the vertical because of the force of gravity and buckling. Once the fires diminished and the sagging trusses cooled, they began to pull on the core and perimeter columns. With the core columns being the stronger, the perimeter columns were bowed inwards. Eventually, this bowing is what caused the collapse of the towers - http://www.debunking911.com/sag.htm and http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm .

Plane impacts, jet fuel, combustible materials and a massive release of energy CAN result in the felling of a 110-storey tower and still obey the laws of Nature via energy transfer. Unfortunately (for some), it IS this simple and no need exists for massive conspiracy that include the planting and time detonation of explosives or massive death rays from outer space by non-existent technologies.

by Tom Murphy (3 articles, 5 quicklinks, 16 diaries, 2100 comments [55 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:29:55 AM

  (0+)

Robin Cook, former leader of the British House of Commons and Foreign Secretary from 1997-2001, has written that Bin Laden was, "a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies" and that the mujahideen that formed Al-Qaida were "originally ... recruited and trained with help from the CIA". Even if this is not true, available information leads one to believe the alleged hijackers were ushered into the USA and kept near military or Agency facilities....so as to say....Uncle Bin may not have been on the CIA payroll but his "nephews" with the boxcutters most likely were ....albeit, indirectly. We all know how money flows these days.

I was hoping you would post a Diary. Disappointment lingers on.

by Tony Forest (7 articles, 18 quicklinks, 166 diaries, 1429 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 8:40:58 AM

  (0+)

Well then I gues I can throw out the mountain of overwhelming evidence that has surfaced due to hundreds of researchers over the past six years in favor of one person who thinks otherwise. Brilliant.

by Bill Cain (3 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 434 comments [67 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:56:38 PM

  (0+)

and we (my son a structural engineer and I are unconvinced) The lecturer is talking third hand on most of his data and full of assumption...the points aren't in his area of expertise.  eg  he is experienced in two story schools and the like which according to my son are very  to the extreme high rise of the world trade centre.

A number of his conclusions are leaps of faith or at best circumstancial but are definately not absolute. There is in some cases  according to my son several plausible alternative answers to the ones he gives as 'proof'.

I think it is absurd that he states we are the jury and this is the case. He decries that we lack technical skills as an impediment.  would you trust a person who has watched a few TV programs an read a book or two to diagnose your sick children?

In a court case he would give a point of view and the other side can cross examine and offer alternative hypothesis. To me to demand a new investigation I believe he needs more than circumstantial evidence.

As Judge  Roy Bean put it you can't hang a man on circustantial evidence ...you need a rope.

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 9:59:06 PM

  (0+)

keep to the point. 110 stories of building with inard-core networks of steel enough to make fort knox do not fall at the speed of no resistance unless there was no resistance. why was there no resistance. That is the question.

by remo (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 96 comments [37 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:52:08 PM

  (0+)

As my Structural engineer son points out Building floors are designed to hold the weights put on them. The same goes for the 'columns' they are thinner less weight at the top that at the bottom.

He also pointed out that the architect in question has never actually seen a controlled demolition. This involves hundreds if not thousands of ‘wire linked’ precisely placed explosives per floor. To take out a normal sized building it takes days, teams of men and there are checks and double check.

 To bring down the twin towers there would have needed semi trucks loads of explosives, miles and miles of wire a team of hundreds of men all installing these explosives. It would have been obvious to the employees or security staff what was going on. Radio devices would have been out because of possible accidental ignition.

Finally there is a world of difference between an architect and an engineer in their roles in the design of a building. It is unlikely that the Architect has enough skills to discuss the issue definitively. Would you trust a year 12 science teacher to construct a shuttle?

by Andris (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 531 comments) on Saturday, Dec 15, 2007 at 3:51:40 AM

  (0+)

 - a very thought-provoking piece - http://www.rudemacedon.ca/lgi/911-thoughtex.html - stand back from the hysteria offered up by the tv broadcasters selling a certain pov, and think this out for yourself. There's only one place to go.

by siamdave (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 85 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:17:32 PM

  (0+)

911 Controlled Demolition Demonstration...

http://tinyurl.com/34tl5s

by Shoes4Industry (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Thursday, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:49:40 PM

  (0+)

Thank you Shoes4Industry for that useful link.

What's most fascinating is the fire at One Meridian Plaza on Feb 23, 1991 which was the worst in Philadelphia history. It started on the 22nd floor of the 38-story building when a pile of linseed oil-soaked rags left by a contractor were ignited accidentally through spontaneous combustion and the building burned for 19 hours, raged from the 22nd floor to the 30th floor before a sprinkler system installed by a tenant on the 30th floor extinguished the flames. The fire eventually went to 12-alarms and consumed the resources of 51 engine companies, 15 ladder companies, 11 specialized units, and over 300 firefighters. Sadly, the fire claimed the lives of three firefighters, and injured two dozen more. However! The building did not collapse. In-fact, as a former Iron Worker here in Philadelphia I'd spoken with several men who I'd worked with over the years and who were actually hired to do some of the pre-demolition work  on the Meridian building weeks after the fire. One gentleman I'd spoken with told me from the intense heat that many of the beams had deflected and twisted several inches, however! and again, the beams did not break they only sagged. And this fire lasted 19 hours!

911 was an inside job. I don't give a rat's arse what these mulish people who post their non-sense claiming that it wasn't think. They're wrong! Only a fool would believe otherwise. You could see and hear the explosions going off at the Twin Towers. That's why these brilliant scholars have put together this article and are calling or a new investigation and to bring awareness and the truth out into the open to the credulous Americans who continue to believe that 19 men with box cutters were able to hijack jets and crashed them into the Trade Towers. THAT'S RUBBISH!  A crime was committed and we need a new investigation. 

by Munich (1 articles, 86 quicklinks, 14 diaries, 1125 comments [86 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 3:07:30 PM

  (0+)

Let's remember what Aaron Russo, who produced the movie America: From Freedom to Fascism, said publicly a while back, before he died. When you couple that with the Project for New American Century's wishful note about a "new Pearl Harbor" as a catalyst for quickly launching this new American century, you are starting to get a pattern: 

Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11

Hollywood director Russo recalls remarkable "forecast" of coming attack

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | October 28 2006

Hollywood director, producer and documentary film maker Aaron Russo, currently receiving a wave of plaudits for his latest release, America: From Freedom to Fascism, told The Alex Jones Show that Nicholas Rockefeller had personally assured him there was going to be an "event" that would trigger the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq eleven months before 9/11 took place.

During his career in the entertainment industry, Russo was manager for Bette Midler from 1972 to 1979 [1] and The Manhattan Transfer, and the producer of the films The Rose and Trading Places. He also produced Wise Guys. Russo has stated that he was the first person to book Led Zeppelin in a United States venue, (the "Electric Circus," Chicago,1968, later named the "Kinetic Playground").

Saying he had been approached many times by the Rockefellers and other members of the CFR elite in an attempt to recruit him, Russo recalled a conversation that would come home to roost on September 11, 2001.

"Here's what I do know first hand - I know that about eleven months to a year before 9/11 ever happened I was talking to my Rockefeller friend (Nicholas Rockefeller) and he said to me 'Aaron there's gonna be an event' and he never told me what the event was going to be - I'm not sure he knew what the event was going to be I don't know that he knew that," said Russo.

Russo related how Rockefeller knew precisely what the event would lead to and which countries would be militarily targeted by the elite.

"He just said there's gonna be an event and out of that event we're gonna invade Afghanistan so we can run pipelines through the Caspian sea, we can go into Iraq to take the oil and establish bases in the middle east and to make the middle east part of the new world order and we're going to go after Venezuela - that's what's going to come out of this event."

"Eleven months to a year later that's what happened....he certainly knew that something was going to happen."

"In my relationships with some of these people I can tell you that it's as evil as it really gets - this is it - this is the game," stated Russo - also relating how members of the elite were routinely obsessed by creating a world identification society where people had to carry ID cards and prove who they were at all times.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Launch of Aaron Russo's From Freedom to Fascism on DVD!
Neither left- nor right-wing, this startling examination exposes the systematic erosion of civil liberties in America, the federal reserve scam and the plan to track and trace the movements of every US citizen.
Click here to get your copy!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Russo was told that if he joined the elite he would be exempted from any of the police state measures inflicted on the general public. He has now chosen to take a bold public stance on everything he knows and stated that the potential consequences no longer concern him and that freedom for future generations is paramount.

Rockefeller also told Russo that the elite families created and financed the women's lib movement so they could tax another half of the population and so that the children would be trained by them in government schools rather than in the context of the family unit.

Russo also sounded off on 9/11, openly airing his view for the first time that it was a complete inside job.

"People know that 9/11 was an inside job," said Russo, "look what they did here in America, look at 9/11, look what they did - they killed thousands of Americans - people jumping out of windows from a hundred floors up - they don't care," said the director.

"There's no way that Building 7 came down without a controlled demolition, it takes weeks to do the controlled demolition, they couldn't have done it in a few hours like Larry Silverstein said - it blows the whole game - concrete doesn't turn to powder unless its exploded."

"We all know that 9/11 was a fraud - an inside job," concluded Russo.

by Mac McKinney (53 articles, 113 quicklinks, 240 diaries, 1413 comments [31 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:18:44 AM

  (0+)

Munich,

What do you think of Cindy Sheehan, an anti-bush and an anti-war apostle, who campaigns for impeachment of traitor-criminals, but who still believs in the official Fairy Tale and the murderous arab hijackers armed with boxcutters who hate our freedom determined to cut everybody's throats? Isn't this type of muleheadedness counter-productive to the nation's peace mouvement? We can already hear Dubya saying : ' If you don't believe what I tell you about Al Qaeda and Bin Laden just listen to Cindy Sheehan and she will sure convince you'  Sorry situation indeed

by ramsheyi (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 793 comments [1 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Dec 14, 2007 at 4:37:25 PM

  (0+)

Yes.. perhaps it IS a sorry situation.

I am thankful however that Cindy lives and breathes on the planet and if she is too busy yet to investigate the 911 travesty then I can only assume she will come to it soon.

<b>"Slowly I turn ...Step by Step"</b>

:-) 

by Jules Purvis (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Monday, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:42:40 PM

  (0+)

Sorry situation indeed Yes.. perhaps it IS a sorry situation. I am thankful however that Cindy lives and breathes on the planet and if she is too busy yet to investigate the 911 travesty then I can only assume she will come to it soon. [b]"Slowly I turn ...Step by Step"[/b] :-)

by Jules Purvis (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Monday, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:45:24 PM

  (0+)