Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 27, 2009 at 16:18:47

Must Read 10   Well Said 7   Interesting 3   View Ratings | Rate It   (42 comments)

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 11/27/09:     Permalink

You Get What you Vote For!

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to yahoo buzz
submit to digg
Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code

By Cindy Sheehan (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)
Become a Fan Become a Fan   (15 fans)

opednews.com

For OpEdNews: Cindy Sheehan - Writer

The so-called anti-war movement currently finds itself in somewhat of a quagmire: What to do when the man you raised money for, volunteered for, and yes, even voted for, actually fulfills one of his most repulsive campaign promises?

First of all, I never understood why, or how, peace people could support someone who voted to pay for the wars while he was a Senator and was quite clear on the fact that he would increase violence in Afghanistan and perform a slow, painful and very incomplete withdrawal from Iraq. Principles that were proclaimed so loudly while Bush was president get shoved aside and buried now that a Democrat is president and how do you get your principles back from the dung-pile of selling out?

Secondly, On January 23rd of a rapidly dissipating 2009, Barack Obama perpetrated his first war crime (as president) by authorizing a drone attack in Pakistan. In February of this same year, he ordered an increase of roughly 20,000 more troops to Afghanistan: more war crimes, no corresponding outcry. However, when I cried out, I was roundly attacked by the "left" for not giving Obama a "chance." 2009 is going to be the most deadly year for our troops and Afghan and Pakistani civilians on record. I think George Bush is calling: he wants his Nobel Peace Prize back.

It is being widely reported (and it seems hotly anticipated by some)--that even though the "anti-war" movement wrote a letter to Obama and asked him to "pretty please" not send any more troops to Afghanistan and had us calling the White House all day on Monday the 23rd when Obama was scheduled to hold his final "war summit"--that the U.S. will commit 34,000 more troops to Afghanistan which is a 50 percent increase in troop strength in the Land of Certain Empire Death.

What is the "anti-war" movement's response going to be? Candlelight vigils; "honk if you love peace" rallies; a hundred rounds of "We Shall Over Come" (someday, not today or tomorrow); or, is the "anti-war" movement going to say: "Phew, McChrystal asked for 80,000, but our letter worked--he's only sending 34,000?"

True story: in October of 2005, U.S. troop deaths were going to reach 2000, within days and the "movement" was planning its response. I called for a die-in, with risk of arrest, in front of the White House and MoveOn.org called for a candlelight vigil in Lafayette Park. MoveOn.org moved their vigil to another location because they told me that their members weren't ready to do civil disobedience and some of them may be accidentally swept up in some kind of a "peace sweep." I said, "Fine, MoveOn.org, have a candlelight vigil for 2000 like you did for 1000 and next year you'll have one for 3000, then 4000, and then 5000." I think many of MoveOn.org's members were ready, I just don't think that MoveOn.org was then, or is now. They didn't do it when Bush was president, I can't imagine MoveOn.org standing up for peace when their man is the one doing the killing.

So, here we are four years, thousands of U.S. troops deaths and hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths later, and the Pope of Hope, the Dalai O'bama, the Nobel Laureate will soon be condemning thousands of more to the same fate and his supporters have given him permission to do so, no matter how many letters they write, petitions they sign or phone calls they make.

In the end, you always get what you vote for.

I knew that this surge was a done deal no matter how much political posturing and pandering occurred. I chained myself to the White House fence on October 5th and was arrested with 60 other people protesting the wars and demanding that peace be put on the proverbial table. But those were symbolic actions and the problems we are facing are deadly and in full Techno-Color, real. The time for symbolism and street-theater ended years ago, but moribund actions won't seem to just go away gracefully, so we will have to cut them off, cold turkey!

On Monday, November 30, the Peace of the Action Coalition will be sending out a press release condemning the escalation and announcing our Mother of all Protests (MOAP) that will begin in the spring.

If you're looking for some action, look no further than Peace of the Action and stayed fine-tuned for further details!

 

Cindy Sheehan is the mother of Spc. Casey Austin Sheehan, who was KIA in Iraq on 04/04/04. She is a co-founder and President of Gold Star Families for Peace and the author of two books: Not One More Mother's Child and Dear President Bush.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
41 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Did Ms. Sheehan Prefer McCain? by Gustav Wynn on Friday, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:06:03 PM
You are part of the problem by Jeffrey Rock on Friday, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:16:36 PM
The powerless protest voters... by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:14:00 AM
Response by Jeffrey Rock on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:41:54 AM
We will not live long enough.... by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:50:03 AM
No way by Jeffrey Rock on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:19:13 AM
The electoral funnel of crap by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:22:23 PM
Pray tell... by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:34:51 PM
Democratic Party Enablers by Bill Tower on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:58:38 PM
There's a lot more to fix by Ian MacLeod on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:40:10 PM
So much common ground... by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:38:01 PM
Because it does not work by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:41:23 PM
By Election Time the Important Decisions Have Been Made by PrMaine on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:19:54 AM
Choice between two by Jeffrey Rock on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:30:16 PM
Do you agree with my point by BFalcon on Monday, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:54:00 PM
Yes but first by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:45:38 PM
The laws I was talking about are state laws by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:54:42 PM
Are You by shadow dancer on Friday, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:51:35 PM
Thanks for speaking out so clearly, Cindy! by Nathan Nahm on Friday, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:20:08 PM
Good article by Jeffrey Rock on Friday, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:28:49 PM
Most of our elections are a show by Sleeper on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:34:03 PM
The Military Industrial Complex dominates our politics by August Adams on Friday, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:51:38 PM
Why not focus on an easier target by BFalcon on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:53:02 AM
All for any Reductions to the War Machine by August Adams on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:18:19 PM
I propose to focus by BFalcon on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:07:37 PM
I already proposed a plan by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 7:57:37 AM
Violence by Hoss Hoss on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:20:50 AM
We Get What We Vote For?? by Dennis Kaiser on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:33:09 AM
There is actually an answer by BFalcon on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:07:53 AM
Deceptive Obama Does White Man's Burden by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:35:47 AM
Wherever the US war machine goes... by Georgianne Nienaber on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:47:15 AM
why not send 34,000 doctors and nurses to Afghanistan? by siriusss on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:54:38 AM
Pay-as-You-Go and the Universal Draft by Jason Paz on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:45:08 AM
How by Michael Dewey on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:20:40 AM
What's happening to the world? by Betsy Whitfill on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:45:20 AM
No betrayal by Bill Samuel on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:06:57 PM
What I am asking in Portland, Oregon by Joe Walsh on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:57:13 PM
We Need a Whole New Politics - here is how! by michaelslevinson on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:59:26 PM
Told you so. by Guy Dwyer on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:18:27 PM
You're throwing a prissy-fit over a corrupt president?-- by Allan Wayne on Saturday, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:23:32 PM
It's the progressives' fault by Perry Logan on Sunday, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:01:28 AM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum