Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   15 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why We Must Raise Taxes on the Rich

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 5   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 4/4/11

Become a Fan
  (105 fans)

It's tax time. It's also a time when right-wing Republicans are setting the agenda for massive spending cuts that will hurt most Americans.

Here's the truth: The only way America can reduce the long-term budget deficit, maintain vital services, protect Social Security and Medicare, invest more in education and infrastructure, and not raise taxes on the working middle class is by raising taxes on the super rich.

Even if we got rid of corporate welfare subsidies for big oil, big agriculture, and big Pharma -- even if we cut back on our bloated defense budget -- it wouldn't be nearly enough.

The vast majority of Americans can't afford to pay more. Despite an economy that's twice as large as it was 30 years ago, the bottom 90-percent are still stuck in the mud. If they're employed they're earning on average only about $280 more a year than 30 years ago, adjusted for inflation. That's less than a 1-percent gain over more than a third of a century. (Families are doing somewhat better but that's only because so many families now have to rely on two incomes.)

Yet even as their share of the nation's total income has withered, the tax burden on the middle has grown. Today's working and middle-class taxpayers are shelling out a bigger chunk of income in payroll taxes, sales taxes, and property taxes than 30 years ago.

It's just the opposite for super rich.

The top 1-percent's share of national income has doubled over the past three decades (from 10-percent in 1981 to well over 20-percent now). The richest one-tenth of 1-percent's share has tripled. And they're doing better than ever. According to a new analysis by the Wall Street Journal, total compensation and benefits at publicly-traded Wall Street banks and securities firms hit a record in 2010 -- $135 billion. That's up 5.7-percent from 2009.

Yet, remarkably, taxes on the top have plummeted. From the 1940s until 1980, the top tax income tax rate on the highest earners in America was at least 70-percent. In the 1950s, it was 91-percent. Now it's 35-percent. Even if you include deductions and credits, the rich are now paying a far lower share of their incomes in taxes than at any time since World War II.

The estate tax (which only hits the top 2-percent) has also been slashed. In 2000 it was 55-percent and kicked in after $1 million. Today it's 35-percent and kicks in at $5 million. Capital gains -- comprising most of the income of the super-rich -- were taxed at 35-percent in the late 1980s. They're now taxed at 15-percent.

If the rich were taxed at the same rates they were half a century ago, they'd be paying in over $350 billion more this year alone, which translates into trillions over the next decade. That's enough to accomplish everything the nation needs while also reducing future deficits.

If we also cut what we don't need (corporate welfare and bloated defense), taxes could be reduced for everyone earning under $80,000, too. And with a single payer health-care system -- Medicare for all -- instead of a gaggle of for-profit providers, the nation could save billions more.

Yes, the rich will find ways to avoid paying more taxes courtesy of clever accountants and tax attorneys. But this has always been the case regardless of where the tax rate is set. That's why the government should aim high. (During the 1950s, when the top rate was 91-percent, the rich exploited loopholes and deductions that as a practical matter reduced the effective top rate 50- to 60-percent -- still substantial by today's standards.)

And yes, some of the super rich will move their money to the Cayman Islands and other tax shelters. But paying taxes is a central obligation of citizenship, and those who take their money abroad in an effort to avoid paying American taxes should lose their American citizenship.

But don't the super-rich have enough political power to kill any attempt to get them to pay their fair share? Only if we let them. Here's the issue around which Progressives, populists on the right and left, unionized workers, and all other working people who are just plain fed up ought to be able to unite.

Besides, the reason we have a Democrat in the White House -- indeed, the reason we have a Democratic Party at all -- is to try to rebalance the economy exactly this way.

All the President has to do is connect the dots -- the explosion of income and wealth among America's super-rich, the dramatic drop in their tax rates, the consequential devastating budget squeezes in Washington and in state capitals, and the slashing of vital public services for the middle class and the poor.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://robertreich.org/

Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor and Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, has a new film, "Inequality for All," to be released September 27. He blogs at www.robertreich.org.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Republican's Big Lies About Jobs (And Why Obama Must Repudiate Them)

Paul Ryan Still Doesn't Get It

What Mitt Romney Really Represents

The Minimum Wage, Guns, Healthcare, and the Meaning of a Decent Society

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again

The Gas Wars

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Dr. Reich, excellent analysis, the consequences ... by amos richardson on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:12:26 PM
They just don't care. Lawyers are the biggest prob... by Debbie S on Tuesday, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:20:09 AM
If you simply took all the income that the rich ea... by Doc McCoy on Tuesday, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:45:54 AM
No, rich do not need to defend themselves- the Old... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:48:49 AM
<<<The whole point of the budget deficit... by Doc McCoy on Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:51:44 AM
Hey Doc, That's the corner we are pinned into isn'... by martin mcnamara on Tuesday, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:17:50 PM
<<<I think what your forgetting Mr. Codge... by Doc McCoy on Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:10:07 AM
" Personally, I can't help but wonder how many of ... by Laura Roberts on Tuesday, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:41:08 PM
are numbered among those who pay no taxes? I'll wa... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:11:50 AM
Codger: Noun: An elderly man, esp. one who is o... by Allan Wayne on Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:16:50 AM
They and others like them paid no tax.ZERO.NO TAXE... by zonie on Tuesday, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:17:40 PM
you paid hundreds of millions of dollars more than... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:06:06 AM
Oh Mr. Reich, if common sense were only more commo... by martin mcnamara on Tuesday, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:03:15 PM
Also, level the playing field. Shouldn't be able t... by Nick van Nes on Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:09:51 AM
passed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act that ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:30:30 AM