Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   24 comments

General News

When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns, and how guns REALLY become illegal

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 6/29/09

Become a Fan
  (13 fans)
- Advertisement -

The first part of this article will discuss another great myth of the progun lobbyists. This presupposes a condition that could never exist in reality in the US of today, that of all private gun ownership being illegal. As hilarious as this statement sounds, it is believed and repeated by tens of millions of Americans as one of their fundamental reasons why gun control laws are bad. They equate any gun control law with this cliché as if no other type of gun safety provisions could ever exist.

 

Let's review this absurd abomination and its roots. One of the earliest known references to such an illogical and impossible situation appears to come from a somewhat obscure American essayist from the latter half of the 20th Century. According to Wikipedia, Edward Abbey was an American author and essayist noted for his advocacy of environmental issues and criticism of public land policies. His best-known works include the novel The Monkey Wrench Gang, which has been cited as an inspiration by radical environmental groups, and the non-fiction work Desert Solitaire. Writer Larry McMurtry referred to Abbey as the "Thoreau of the American West".

 

But his progun quote of fame comes from another, less well known essay called "Abbey's Road." In 1979, Edward Abbey wrote, "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws." He is also quoted in "The Right to Bear Arms," from the same year as saying, "The tank, the B-52, the fighter-bomber, the state-controlled police and military are the weapons of dictatorship. The rifle is the weapon of democracy. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military. The hired servants of our rulers. Only the government - and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws." 

It is easy to make the not-so-mental leap to the quote we see slapped on bumper stickers all over America and especially on the bumpers of pickups carrying gun racks, far too many guns, and signs of the Confederate States of America in obvious places, though the latter is not an obligation, but a birthright. Even though the statement is absurd and describes a situation that could never occur in the US while the second amendment remains in effect, the main concept that progun proponents are trying to convey is that the outlawing of ALL guns would create a situation where the only people who would have access to guns of any kind are the criminal elements of society and that the good, law-abiding citizenry would be basically defenseless against their aggression. Of course, we must first discard the obvious fact that law enforcement agencies around the country would probably still maintain their weaponry. It is then true that a situation where the citizenry has absolutely no access to guns, yet guns remain accessible to those who want to obtain them illegally, would necessitate the result that the criminals would have a great advantage over the average citizen.

However, by breaking down the various elements within the quote itself, this straw man is shown to be baseless. We are all very aware what an outlaw is. The name became synonymous with criminals living in the Old West who would ride in on their trusty deeds and terrorize the locals. Let's now look at the second key element of this straw man, outlawed guns. Any gun used in the commitment of an illegal act by someone other than its owner can be designated an "outlawed gun," or "illegal gun." Thus, many progun lobbyists maintain that most of the guns used in criminal acts around the US are actually illegal guns and they are stolen from their rightful owners and then sold to the highest bidder on the gun black market.

Several years ago, PBS aired a special on illegal guns. One of their findings was that the myth about guns getting into criminal hands via theft is wrong. While the local policeman might agree with the progun lobbyists, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) do not. According to agent Jay Wachtel, most guns used in crimes are not stolen out of private gun owners' homes and cars. "Stolen guns account for only about 10% to 15% of guns used in crimes."

 

If that's the case, where are these illegal guns coming from? They aren't manufactured illegally. If there are thousands of illegal manufacturers of guns in America, why isn't our law enforcement agencies closing them and putting their illegal manufacturers behind bars? Where is our law enforcement if we have tons of illegal arms being manufactured on a daily basis and being sold to criminals? The answer is simple. Guns ARE NOT manufactured illegally. Guns almost never start off as illegal. Guns are made legally.

Then how do they attain their illegal status? According to the Violence Policy Center, VPC, one of the principle answers is the holiest of holies, the gun show. Their report, Illegal Trafficking at Gun Shows, demonstrates how illegal firearm transactions at gun shows produce an abundance of guns ripe for the gun black market. These trades usually occur in one of three ways:

- Advertisement -

 

Straw man purchases

Out-of-state sales

Sales from "personal" collections

Straw man purchases happen when someone who is prohibited from buying guns gives the money to another person who can buy guns. Very few people are ever brought up for charges of this type even though it often takes place right under the dealer's nose. The VPC states, "At a 1993 hearing on federal firearms licensing before the crime subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee, one of the few convicted criminals for this offense, Edward Daily III, testified that he regularly used straw purchasers to buy handguns at gun shows in Virginia. The 22-year-old Daily traded the guns for narcotics in New York City. At the hearing, then-House Crime Subcommittee Chair Charles Schumer (D-NY), who has played a leading role in documenting gun show abuses, questioned Daily as to the role gun shows play in criminal trafficking. Daily testified, "At each gun show, there were about, maybe 250 tables with different gun dealers, and we would visit maybe 20, 30 tables. Some of them saw me every weekend, and they knew me....'Hi. How's it going....Are you picking up any guns today?'" Representative Schumer asked Daily whether "this was always at gun shows?" Daily responded, "Always at gun shows."

 

The VPC points out one common story as told by the National Association of Stocking Gun Dealers' Bill Bridgewater who asserts that gun show violations occur all the time. "If you can't see them you're blind. When you go to a [North Carolina] gun show and you see every state licensee around you for 250 to 300 miles and you chat with various folk standing behind their table of handguns...[from Ohio, Florida, Virginia], does that give you a clue? There are a lot of [illegal sales being committed] under the color of an FFL traveling state to state every weekend and attending firearms shows and selling firearms unlawfully in those states. The principal reason they do is that at every gun show in this nation no one pays any attention to the law." Another FFL dealer, Richard Yarmy, illegally sold guns to New York City criminals for years before being caught.

- Advertisement -

 

Personal collections, VPC concludes, are also another good source for gun trafficking. Many unscrupulous dealers use their family and friends as purchasers who are merely augmenting their own hobby while others state that they are merely selling their very own collection. In defining the threshold of activity one must cross to be categorized as a "dealer," The Firearm Owners Protection Act, also known as the McClure-Volkmer Act, specifically excludes a person who makes "exchanges or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection...or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms."

Therefore, private individuals selling firearms at gun shows from their "personal collections" are not required to obtain a Federal Firearms License, and as noted earlier, need not comply with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements that apply to license holders. In addition, unscrupulous dealers can thwart gun control laws by transferring weapons to relatives' or friends' "personal collections," to be resold with no record of the ultimate purchaser.

 

Progun lobbyists will also argue that we already have enough gun laws out there and that they are good enough to protect us going forward. But as in the cases cited above, where people circumvent the law on purpose, a law is only as good as its enforcement. When the letter of the law becomes a shallow and moot point, it ceases to be effective. Let's look at just one case where a person commits a crime using a firearm in the murder of others, is arrested and convicted, and then returns to their vice upon release back into society.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

60 year old Californian male - I've lived in four different countries, USA, Switzerland, Mexico, Venezuela - speak three languages fluently, English, French, Spanish - part-time journalist for Empower-Sport Magazine. I also write four (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Elecricity for Venezuela - Rednecks in Chavezland

The Tarahumara Indians of Mexico "Olympics Too Short"

The new and revised Preamble to the Constitution

Chapter Thirteen: The Cuban Missile Crisis of October, 1962

IMMIGRATION FROM THE IMMIGRANT'S POINT OF VIEW

THE FOURTH POWER AND THE RISE OF YELLOW JOURNALISM

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

But I couldn't agree more with your conclusion: "... by GL Rowsey on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:54:55 PM
Sorry I made it so difficult to read, but thanks f... by John Little on Monday, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:57:42 PM
As you point out, whether you are pro- or anti- gu... by Mike Kimball on Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:51:02 AM
Um, I see where I have the link to David, but not ... by John Little on Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:36:05 PM
First – You attribute to John Lott what many woul... by Mike Kimball on Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:42:19 PM
Jens Ludwig, Do Permissive Concealed-Carry Laws Re... by John Little on Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:14:20 PM
John, My planet Earth has a Mexico, NY. Are yo... by Mike Kimball on Wednesday, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:29:01 AM
I thought you were just being cynical. You actuall... by John Little on Wednesday, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:42:28 PM
I had to really wonder how to respond to this. I ... by Mike Kimball on Thursday, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:51:45 PM
You wrote this: "stop trying to strip a RIGHT awa... by John Little on Thursday, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:26:45 PM
I apologize about the math and perhaps I needed to... by John Little on Thursday, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:43:05 PM
Funny how serial posts can vary perception. I wil... by Mike Kimball on Friday, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:00:48 AM
You wrote this: "You just don't get it." Your... by Mike Kimball on Thursday, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:52:28 PM
I never much cared about what the majority thought... by John Little on Friday, Jul 3, 2009 at 1:33:32 AM
Majority or minority is neither here nor there. I... by Mike Kimball on Friday, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:43:13 AM
I constantly mention the focus on gun violence, no... by John Little on Friday, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:38:26 PM
 "Why should people down here care if a bunch... by sesquiculus on Wednesday, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:42:02 PM
I'm missing you're point. You are saying this: "t... by John Little on Thursday, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:01:52 AM
Hopefully, you are not so dumb as to miss my point... by sesquiculus on Wednesday, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:47:02 AM
The racist issue is there in the US. It currently ... by John Little on Wednesday, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:38:43 AM
Gun culture ? It is hard to understand what you me... by sesquiculus on Thursday, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:57:16 PM
And I bet you don't even see the hypocrisy of your... by John Little on Thursday, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:59:00 PM
John Little says: "As long as your one neighborhoo... by sesquiculus on Sunday, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:41:06 AM
Perhaps you think black victims of homicide are le... by sesquiculus on Friday, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:59:10 PM