Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
13 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

There Is Only One Party in the USA - the War Party

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 4/3/11

opednews.com

Afghanistan.   Iraq.   Libya.   What nation will we bomb next?

Who are the people who support these wars?   They are not the majority of the public.   A recent CBS News poll showed that 53% of adults nationwide said we "should not be involved" in Afghanistan.

They are not our elected officials, either.   Just as a nation cannot go to war on an empty stomach, neither can a president or a Congress actually go and fight the wars themselves.   They also need to find a way to persuade a public sometimes wary of the idea of war.

The president does not frame any choice as between peace or war.   Peace would always win!  So President Obama recently justified our intervention in Libya as "humanitarian," President George W. Bush warned us of (non-existent) weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, etc.

Sander Hicks, author of The Big Wedding 9/11, the Whistle-Blowers and the Cover-up, once said that "history shows us that when the [U.S.] rulers decide to go to war, they 'create' a reason."   That they can decide to fight before they reason suggests that our leaders are prepared to start war at all times.

So who wants war?

There is a machine keeping the drive for war alive.   The machine is composed of those who benefit the most from the decision to go to war. There are the companies that make the weapons, like Boeing, the companies that provide support to the troops, like Halliburton, the generals that live for war, the people who own stock in the defense contractor companies and others who believe that the United States must defend itself against non-existent threats.

This group of people has interests that supersede those of the rest of us.   They impose their interest in war in different ways.   The defense contractors contribute money evenly to both major political parties and pay heavily to lobby Congress for favorable laws and policies, the generals offer advice to the politicians about the need to fight and the stockholders put their money before their patriotism.

They are the War Party.   Democrats and Republicans bow to them.   To oppose this party means less campaign money, less support and a lingering suspicion that one is "soft on defense."   Have you ever heard of a candidate for office talk about the need for a "weaker defense?"

Our next wars have already been planned for us with justifications designed to obfuscate the truth just like all of our previous wars.   The only way to stop the War party is to de-fund those who benefit from war until they can adequately defend our need to go there.


Peace Dove by Photobucket

 

http://www.deanhartwell.com

Dean Hartwell's book, "Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11," reached the top of Amazon's charts for large print books on history. He has authored three others: "Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk:the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stop Shooting Conspiracy Theory Messengers

Reverse the Revolution of 1963

Debate over Judyth Vary Baker's JFK Story Gets Record Response

Road to 9/11 Truth Goes through Cleveland

What is the Real Story about Jesus?

9/11 Passengers Landed in Cleveland

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Those who want war have the deep pockets and the a... by Dean Hartwell on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:52:53 AM
that we can make making Peace patriotic. ... by j dial on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:28:08 AM
j dial, the way to make peace patriotic is to brin... by Alan MacDonald on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:51:44 PM
Lately, and because of Libya and the prospect of a... by Alan MacDonald on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 12:02:38 PM
The greatest obstacle to achieving peace is that w... by Philip Zack on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:36:01 PM
We need to visualize peace. War and peace are not... by Dean Hartwell on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:06:06 PM
One must consider the source of information hawked... by Bud Martin on Sunday, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:09:04 PM
"'Peace' is certainly a desirable concept. Histor... by j dial on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:02:26 PM
That's why they gave the warmonger the peace prize... by zonie on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:25:21 PM
All Life is developed by conflict, and the continu... by Bud Martin on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:00:32 PM
Our very way of life is threatened by the interrup... by Philip Pease on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:16:34 AM
Use less.If everyone dropped their use by five gal... by zonie on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:28:20 PM
Fiction, of course!Article here shows further the ... by Dean Hartwell on Monday, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:27:38 AM