Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

9/11 Passengers Landed in Cleveland

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

On the day of September 11, 2001, one airport had unusual activity still not completely explained to this day: Cleveland.

There, two planes made emergency landings - Delta 1989 (scheduled for Los Angeles) and an unidentified plane within about a half hour of one another - 10:10 AM and 10:45 AM. (The emergency landings were ordered by authorities based on what turned out to be a false report of a bomb on board one of the planes).

A passenger from 1989 later said there were "sixty or so" passengers on her plane. Although early press reports said the second plane had 200 passengers, there appears to be no corroboration for this exact number and it may well have been an estimate.

Although there are no official numbers of passengers for the flights alleged to have been a part of the plot, manifests and other sources give us a very good guess. David Ray Griffin has used the numbers 92 and 65 for Flights 11 and 175, respectively, and 45 for Flight 93. Though the total number for all three flights (202) is much closer to the estimate, it is reasonable that a person would look at a group of 157 persons and estimate 200.

The researcher Woody Box concludes, based on press and eyewitness reports, that the 1989 passengers went to an FAA building at the south end of the airport and that the second plane passengers went to a NASA facility on the west end of the airport.

In an article on the site "Bravehost," a writer details transcripts purportedly from Flight 1989 and Flight 93 and notes the similarity in a message from "hijackers" on each plane about a bomb on board. The controllers contacted and received a response from the 1989 pilot, who agreed to land in Cleveland, but got no response from 93.

Under the most likely conclusion based on the direct and circumstantial evidence, they arrived in a plane that flew out of Boston. And they can be distinguished from another group of 69 people whom we can confirm took Flight 1989 and made an emergency landing earlier that morning in Cleveland.

None of the passengers apparently stayed around long enough at the airport to talk to anyone. They were simply seen according to reports. They walked in an orderly fashion to a NASA building at the airport, according to these reports.

So there is not much in the way of physical evidence. Circumstantial evidence includes the siting of passengers not previously accounted for and the identification of planes in the Cleveland area in time to make an emergency landing at the times that witnesses specified that flights landed. Two planes stand out, United 175 and United 93, with United 175 as the stronger choice because of its earlier take-off.

These 200 people are officially anonymous and, for all practical purposes, officially "unpersons" because no official report or supporter of the official theory acknowledges them.

The correctness of this theory nullifies the most important points of the official theory, such as the presence of hijackers, the idea of four specific planes taken over and the four crashes involving those four planes. This is why the road to 9/11 Truth goes through Cleveland!

 

http://www.deanhartwell.com

Dean Hartwell's book, "Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11," reached the top of Amazon's charts for large print books on history. He has authored three others: "Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk:the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stop Shooting Conspiracy Theory Messengers

Reverse the Revolution of 1963

Debate over Judyth Vary Baker's JFK Story Gets Record Response

Road to 9/11 Truth Goes through Cleveland

What is the Real Story about Jesus?

9/11 Passengers Landed in Cleveland

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Flight 175 did NOT hit the World Trade Center 2 on... by Dean Hartwell on Saturday, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:35:52 PM
I'm convinced that the planes that hit the WTC wer... by 911TRUTH on Sunday, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:01:10 AM
Thanks, 911Truth!We should presume nothing about t... by Dean Hartwell on Sunday, Sep 5, 2010 at 11:53:17 AM
I'd check it out earlier.....excellent info.There'... by 911TRUTH on Sunday, Sep 5, 2010 at 9:21:39 PM
911 Truth,I was hesitant to challenge the official... by Dean Hartwell on Sunday, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:13:27 PM