Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 13 (17 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Road to 9/11 Truth Goes through Cleveland

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Supported 3   News 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

In determining what happened to the passengers and planes on 9/11, I consider the many falsehoods of the official report. I disregard the official theory and start from scratch to find the answers to these questions. At the end of the longer essay, I conclude a number of things, most notably that no hijackers participated.

I rely upon Bureau of Transportation Statistics records, which indicate clearly that two of the flights associated with 9/11, United 175 and United 93, were scheduled to fly that day and that the other two flights, American 11 and American 77, were not scheduled. The BTS records are half of the key to determining where the planes went. The other half is the proof that none of the targets (World Trade Centers One and Two, the Pentagon and Shanksville) were struck by any planes resembling the ones allegedly used for these four flights.

The following are the series of if-then propositions that I constructed as to the planes and passengers and my reasoning for using the assumptions that I made:

Fact: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) shows that United Airlines Flight 11 and American Airlines Flight 77 were not logged as having taken off that day from Boston or Dulles, respectively, as the official theory states they do.

IF Flights 11 and 77 were not scheduled, then neither 11 nor 77 flew

It would be unlikely for plotters to use planes that were not scheduled to be used on September 11th. Of course the plotters could have arranged to use unscheduled flights, but how would the passengers have learned of them without being suspicious or without being involved?

- Advertisement -

Plotters could have had the idea that controlling two planes was much easier than controlling four. They may then have decided to pretend that two other flights were used by using false "blips" on the Federal Aviation Administration computer screens, by taking advantage of simulations going on throughout the east coast (including Delta 89, now widely thought to be a simulated flight used to distract from others) and by faking phone calls from planes that did not fly.

IF passengers actually went on flights, then the passengers may be accounted for

I have yet to see any proof of tickets bought by the alleged passengers, boarding passes or videotape from surveillance of any of the airports where the alleged passengers left from. Furthermore, no independent expert has ever verified any remains of any of the alleged passengers at any of the "crash sites."

Furthermore, the phone calls associated with the flights could have been handled by a few passengers, or even by voice "morphing."

Fact: A low number of passengers are on the Social Security Death Index.

- Advertisement -

The best evidence of passengers actually flying on any of the planes in question, interestingly, comes from eyewitness accounts of passengers at the Cleveland Airport that morning and from transcripts of communications between air traffic controllers and Flight 1989, which landed in Cleveland, and a second, unidentified plane thought to carry around 200 passengers secretly to Cleveland. Both planes were seen making emergency landings but only passengers from Flight 1989 were spoken to by members of the media.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Dean Hartwell's book, "Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11," reached the top of Amazon's charts for large print books on history. He has authored three others: "Facts Talk but the Guilty Walk:the 9/11 No Hijacker Theory and Its (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Stop Shooting Conspiracy Theory Messengers

Reverse the Revolution of 1963

Debate over Judyth Vary Baker's JFK Story Gets Record Response

Road to 9/11 Truth Goes through Cleveland

What is the Real Story about Jesus?

9/11 Passengers Landed in Cleveland


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Research shows that most of the names associated w... by Dean Hartwell on Sunday, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:36:52 AM
She sat in her studio with "live stream" of World ... by Margo on Sunday, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:14:14 PM
Of course flight 93 didn't 'go down' in a field ju... by cb on Monday, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:04:37 AM
There was a report from a Cincinnati radio station... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:57:57 AM
To have a real honest investigation!... by Debbie S on Monday, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:28:58 PM