Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Push of Conscience and Secretary Clinton

Become a Fan
  (135 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Supported 5   Well Said 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 2/23/11

This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

It was not until Secretary of State Hillary Clinton walked to the George Washington University podium last week to enthusiastic applause that I decided I had to dissociate myself from the obsequious adulation of a person responsible for so much death, suffering and destruction.

I was reminded of a spring day in Atlanta almost five years earlier when then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld strutted onto a similar stage to loud acclaim from another enraptured audience.

Introducing Rumsfeld on May 4, 2006, the president of the Southern Center for International Policy in Atlanta highlighted his "honesty." I had just reviewed my notes for an address I was scheduled to give that evening in Atlanta and, alas, the notes demonstrated his dishonesty.

I thought to myself, if there's an opportunity for Q & A after his speech I might try to stand and ask a question, which is what happened. I engaged in a four-minute impromptu debate with Rumsfeld on Iraq War lies, an exchange that was carried on live TV.

That experience leaped to mind on Feb. 15, as Secretary Clinton strode onstage amid similar adulation.

The fulsome praise for Clinton from GWU's president and the loud, sustained applause also brought to mind a phrase that -- as a former Soviet analyst at CIA -- I often read in Pravda. When reprinting the text of speeches by high Soviet officials, the Communist Party newspaper would regularly insert, in italicized parentheses: "Burniye applaudismenti; vce stoyat" -- Stormy applause; all rise.

With the others at Clinton's talk, I stood. I even clapped politely. But as the applause dragged on, I began to feel like a real phony. So, when the others finally sat down, I remained standing silently, motionless, with my eyes fixed narrowly on the rear of the auditorium and my back to the Secretary.

I did not expect what followed: a violent assault in full view of Secretary Clinton by what in Soviet parlance were called the "organs of state security." The rest is history, as they say. A short account of the incident can be found here.

Callous Aplomb

As the video of the event shows, Secretary Clinton did not miss a beat in her speech as she called for authoritarian governments to show respect for dissent and to refrain from violence. She spoke with what seemed to be an especially chilly sang froid, as she ignored my silent witness and the violent assault that took place right in front of her. 

The experience gave me personal confirmation of the impression that I had reluctantly drawn from watching her behavior and its consequences over the past decade. The incident was a kind of metaphor of the much worse violence that Secretary Clinton has coolly countenanced against others.

Again and again, Hillary Clinton -- both as a U.S. senator and as Secretary of State -- has demonstrated a nonchalant readiness to unleash the vast destructiveness of American military power. The charitable explanation, I suppose, is that she knows nothing of war from direct personal experience.

And that is also true of her husband, her colleague Robert Gates at the Defense Department, President Barack Obama, and most of the White House functionaries blithely making decisions to squander the lives and limbs of young soldiers in foreign adventures -- conflicts that even the top brass admit cannot be won with weapons.

The analogy to Vietnam is inescapable. As White House tapes from the 1960s show, President Lyndon Johnson knew that the Vietnam War could not be "won" in any meaningful way. Nonetheless, he kept throwing hundreds of thousands into the battle lest someone accuse him of being soft on communism.

I had an inside seat watching Johnson do that. And I did nothing.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5


Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). His (more...)
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What's Hayden Hidin'?

Asylum for Julian Assange -- Former Awardee for Integrity

Petraeus Cons Obama on Afghan War

Obama Stands Up to Israel, Tamps Down Iran War Threats

Mullen Wary of Israeli Attack on Iran

Note to Nancy Pelosi: Colin Powell Got Snookered at CIA, too


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

THANK YOU (That picture of you getting mugged wi... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:33:47 PM
You are an example to all of us. Thank you for you... by Saman Mohammadi on Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:58:34 PM
My judgment of Hillary Rodham Clinton's politics r... by Margaret Bassett on Wednesday, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:01:25 PM
And progressives can't figure out why the Democrat... by Perry Logan on Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:05:41 AM
had earned a lot of respect for his work and his... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:25:19 AM
...Mr Not-so-Wonderful!YES! She SHOULD have known ... by Bia Winter on Friday, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:45:55 AM
Mr McGovern for your insights, experience and cour... by Kathy Stuart on Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:01:26 AM
We, on the Left (how ironic that a CIA man can be ... by jimbojames on Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:41:29 AM
From the Chomsky philosophy to what the DLC procla... by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:06:44 PM
Palestinians are planing a Day of Rage Friday (tom... by Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall on Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:42:05 PM
Very well said, Mr. McGovern! And I commend you f... by R. Queisser on Thursday, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:18:40 PM
Yes, the push of conscience is clearly lacking in ... by conrad elledge on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:26:36 PM
Yes, the push of conscience is clearly lacking in ... by conrad elledge on Saturday, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:34:51 PM