Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 17 Share on Facebook 5 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 16 (39 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   24 comments

    OpEdNews Op Eds

Obama Stands Up to Israel, Tamps Down Iran War Threats

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 10   Well Said 9   News 7  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 1/19/12

Become a Fan
  (149 fans)

This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

- Advertisement -
This article cross-posted from Consortium News


Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak

In a stunning departure from recent Israeli threats to attack Iranian nuclear facilities, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Wednesday used an interview with Israel's Army radio to assert that any attack on Iran "is very far off," adding, "We haven't made any decision to do this."

When pressed as to whether "very far off" meant weeks or months, Barak replied: "I wouldn't want to provide any estimates. It's certainly not urgent. I don't want to relate to it as though tomorrow it will happen." The world should be thankful for small favors.

Even more intriguing was the phrasing that the Israeli newspaper Haaretz put under its headline, "Barak: Israel "very far off' from decision on Iran attack." In a sub-head, Haaretz highlighted an equally important change in Israel's stance regarding Iran:
"Israel believes Iran itself has not yet decided whether to make a nuclear bomb, according to intelligence assessment to be presented later this week to U.S. Joint Chief of Staff [Martin] Dempsey."

Haaretz did not specify its sourcing for that information. However, if it's correct, it puts Israel in line with senior U.S. policy and intelligence officials -- like Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper -- who have tenaciously held to the "Iran-has-not-yet-decided" judgment since it was promulgated unanimously by the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies in November 2007.

That National Intelligence Estimate stated up front: "This NIE does not (italics in original) assume that Iran intends to acquire nuclear weapons." Among its declassified Key Judgments were:

"We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program; ... Tehran's decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005."

If you thought that those conclusions in 2007 might be greeted in Official Washington or Tel Aviv with the sighs of relief, you would have been mistaken. Not only were the Israelis in high dudgeon, but so were President George W. Bush and -- even more so -- Vice President Dick Cheney, who had been persuaded to attack Iran's nuclear facilities in 2008.

Here's what Bush wrote in his memoir, Decision Points: "But after the NIE, how could I possibly explain using the military to destroy the nuclear facilities of a country the intelligence community said had no active nuclear weapons program?"

- Advertisement -

For his part, Cheney publicly expressed his chagrin at the wobbliness of his president/protege. The former Vice President told "Fox News Sunday" on Aug. 30, 2009, that he was isolated among Bush advisers in his enthusiasm for war with Iran.

This Time It's Different

Before Wednesday, when Defense Minister Barak promised no imminent Israeli attack on Iran, the unholy alliance between Israeli hawks and American neoconservatives was exuding confidence that they would prevail in Washington -- and also in Tel Aviv -- in pressing for war with Iran.

Yet, this alliance faced two key obstacles that weren't there when a similar coalition successfully pushed the invasion of Iraq in 2003. This time, the White House and other key elements of the U.S. national security apparatus are dead set against attacking Iran or provoking an Iranian attack. They have apparently now made that clear, in unmistakable terms, to Israeli leaders.

And this time, U.S. intelligence has not been "fixed around the policy." CIA analysts have not been badgered into falsifying their assessments to please higher-ups.

- Advertisement -

To disrupt what had appeared to be an unstoppable march toward war with Iran, gaining momentum in December and early January, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta intervened with his own rendition of "Let me be clear."

Appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation" on Jan. 8, and apparently unsure whether host Bob Schieffer would have the courage to ask the $64 question, Panetta decided to ask it himself rhetorically: "Are they [the Iranians] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No."

Yet, in a highly illustrative example of media hypersensitivity on this issue, PBS was not even willing to let the Defense Secretary's comment reach the ears of the network's listeners. Its "NewsHour" program deleted Panetta's emphatic "No" and played only his subsequent comment:

"But we know that they are trying to develop a nuclear capability. And that's what concerns us. And our red line to Iran is do not develop a nuclear weapon. That's a red line for us."

Got that? Panetta said Iran is not trying to develop a nuclear weapon, but Iran better not develop a nuclear weapon because that's a red line for us. Clearly, Panetta was trying to be all things to all people, but he had spoken emphatically to the key question of whether Iran was "trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). His (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What's Hayden Hidin'?

Asylum for Julian Assange -- Former Awardee for Integrity

Petraeus Cons Obama on Afghan War

Obama Stands Up to Israel, Tamps Down Iran War Threats

Mullen Wary of Israeli Attack on Iran

Note to Nancy Pelosi: Colin Powell Got Snookered at CIA, too

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
18 people are discussing this page, with 24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This article is most encouraging and convincing in... by Christie on Thursday, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:55:38 PM
If you follow the standard output of Mythland Medi... by Mike Preston on Thursday, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:47:14 PM
Don't buy the clothes because the mannequins can t... by Ned Lud on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:04:00 AM
The dramatic ashkeNAZI-IDF reversal of policy towa... by Michael Rose on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:05:55 AM
With how gullible people can be. Ron Paul will cu... by Robert Tracey on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:35:32 PM
I, too, briefly felt relief, like perhaps Obama ha... by Robert James on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:29:56 AM
I don't know you, Christie, so maybe you have alwa... by Alan MacDonald on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:14:55 PM
I know of no other current writer who can deal wit... by Jean Blackwood on Thursday, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:47:19 PM
Iran, till after the election, But, it does demons... by Paul Repstock on Thursday, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:51:50 PM
It's Howdy Doody Time!   In other words, as... by Ned Lud on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:52:08 AM
In 1930s it was Hitler- Mussolini game: I threaten... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:44:17 AM
if it shows no more than the fact that Oh-Bomb-Ah&... by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:15:55 AM
Old dogs, old tricks. New dogs, new tricks. Old do... by Ned Lud on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:02:08 AM
I get the impression the Israelis frequently vary ... by Ralph Dratman on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:18:20 AM
As it is, considering Israel's military might (pro... by E. J. N. on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:59:21 PM
Do you really think they would ever shut down thei... by Paul Repstock on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:56:36 PM
I think you are right, Paul, in that there are som... by E. J. N. on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:38:34 PM
 If you and Coleen Rowley are so experienced ... by Omar Bongo on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:26:51 PM
They'll just murder a few Iranian scientists and t... by Robert Tracey on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 4:32:01 PM
I agree, the decision came from Obama. Right from ... by Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:04:47 PM
Obama deserves some credit, but not too much.Obama... by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:32:25 PM
Iraq was contained and no threat to their neighbor... by Lance Ciepiela on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:29:31 PM
The Shiite Muslims in Iran, like the Shiites in Ir... by E. J. N. on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:12:46 PM
I am so tired of reading the missives of those who... by Gloria Grening Wolk on Sunday, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:13:39 PM