Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Ten Swing States Could Decide the 2012 Election; Obama Leads in Nine of Them

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 8/9/12

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

Cross-posted from Wallwritings

With less than three months left before voters decide between President Barack Obama and his Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, Obama has a strong lead in the latest Politico poll figures.

Politico identifies 10 swing states that will most likely decide the 2012 election. Obama leads in nine of them: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Romney leads Obama by one percent in the swing state of North Carolina.

If these swing vote states hold up in an election that requires 270 out of 538 electoral votes to win a majority, Obama would gain 111 electoral votes to Romney's 15. States that appear solid or leaning for Obama give him an addiitional 221 electoral votes. Romney's solid or leaning state electoral votes total 191. These figures add up to 332 for Obama and 206 for Romney, more than enough to give Obama the winning total.

A major reason we might safely assume these numbers will hold up can be found in an ABC-Washington Post poll which found that only 40 percent of voters "hold a favorable view of Romney." In a late May poll, that number was 41, suggesting a downward trend. Low favorability numbers this late in the campaign does not portend well for the challenger.

Romney's unfavorable rating increased from May to August by four percentage points, an increase from 45% to 49%. Say what you will about their actions in office (and I would have many unfavorable things to say about the damage they did), Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush were "liked" by a majority of the voting public, enough to help bring them to the White House.

Michael Tomasky, writing for Newsweek's The Daily Beast, predicts a possible Obama landslide in November. Tomansky points to a winning trend, beginning with Pennsylvanis's shift from a swing state to a strong or leaning Obama state.

"There's a secret lurking behind everything you're reading about the upcoming election, a secret that all political insiders know -- or should -- but few are talking about, most likely because it takes the drama out of the whole business. The secret is the electoral college, and the fact is that the more you look at it, the more you come to conclude that Mitt Romney has to draw an inside straight like you've never ever seen in a movie to win this thing. This is especially true now that it seems as if Pennsylvania isn't really up for grabs. Romney's paths to 270 are few.

"First, let's discuss Pennsylvania. There has been good reason for Democrats to sweat this state. True, Obama won it handily in 2008, by 10 points. But it's a state that is older and whiter and more working-class than most of America. Obama benefited from all the unique circumstances of 2008 that helped him across the country, but if ever there were a state where the "well, we gave the black guy a chance and he blew it" meme might catch on, it's the Keystone State."

In Pennsylvania the incumbent Obama benefits from a jobless rate of 7.5 percent, well bellow the national average. In addition, the Republican national strategy to suppress voting by minorities has run into a judicial roadblock in Pennsyvlania.

"This odious voter ID law is facing meaningful challenges. A hearing on the law's validity has just been concluded. A state judge says he'll rule on the law's constitutionality the week of Aug. 13. It sounds as if the law's opponents made a stronger case at the hearing than its supporters. In any case, the losing side will appeal to the state Supreme Court."

The one thing that could seriously halt an Obama landslide would be interference by outside forces. That may well have been the case with the Iranian government in the Carter-Reagan election in 1980. Whether Republican campaigners made a secret deal with Iran to hold American hostages until after the election, is still hotly debated.

But the fact that the hostage release was timed by Iran to fall on Reagan's 1981 inauguration day offers strong circumstantial evidence that the Iranians did not want Carter to get any credit for negotiating the hostage release. A release of the hostages prior to the election would have greatly enhanced Carter's chances of reelection.

Gary Sick's book, October Surprise, offers strong support to the belief that Reagan's campaign staff interfered in delicate international matters for their own partisan political reasons.

Is Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offering Mitt Romney another October Surprise? His bellicose threats to attack Iran would impact the election, even as it set in motion a series of events destructive to the region.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://wallwritings.wordpress.com/

James Wall is currently a Contributing Editor of The Christian Century magazine, based in Chicago, Illinois. From 1972 through 1999, he was editor and publisher of the Christian Century magazine. Many sources have influenced Jim's writings over (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Does Israel Interfere in US Elections?

How Iran Could Be The Next Neocon Target

Ten Swing States Could Decide the 2012 Election; Obama Leads in Nine of Them

What Protestants Could Learn from Ron Paul

New York Times Flacks for Jewish Groups Against 15 Major Christian Leaders

With South Carolina Victory, Gingrich Rides Adelson Money Train Against Obama

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

So it's four more years of neocon policies and bei... by Perry Logan on Thursday, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:52:53 AM
If you don't get Romney, shouldn't you?... by BFalcon on Friday, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:05:23 AM
For anyone who lived through the horror of Wiscons... by Joanne Boyer on Thursday, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:57:36 AM
"Politico identifies 10 swing states that will mos... by Rixar13 on Thursday, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:18:16 AM
"Politico identifies 10 swing states that will mos... by Rixar13 on Thursday, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:19:50 AM
Go to youtube, watch "The Quigley Formula".  ... by Robert James on Thursday, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:09:12 PM
This is a Potemkin election. Obama is the heir app... by Peter Duveen on Thursday, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:34:35 PM
All the hoopla, speeches,promises,and whining for ... by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:25:37 AM