Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   12 comments

    OpEdNews Op Eds

Surprise, Surprise! Iraq War Was About Oil

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/23/11

Become a Fan
  (148 fans)

This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

- Advertisement -

Afghanistan may be the graveyard of empires, but Iraq is home to a graveyard sense of humor. Iraqis wonder aloud whether the U.S. and Britain would have invaded Iraq if its main export had been cabbages instead of oil.

However obvious the answer, a remarkable array of American pundits and pseudo-savants have resisted giving the oil factor any pride of place among the motives behind the U.S./U.K. decision to invade Iraq in 2003. To this day, the Fawning Corporate Media (FCM) continue to play the accustomed role as government accomplice suppressing unwelcome news.

So, if you don't tune in to Amy Goodman's Democracy Now or read the British press, you will have missed the latest documentary evidence showing that Great Britain's Lords and Ladies lied about how big oil companies, like BP, lusted after Iraqi oil in the months leading up to the attack on Iraq.

Oil researcher Greg Muttitt's new book Fuel on Fire: Oil and Politics in Occupied Iraq presents that evidence, since Muttitt had better luck than American counterparts in getting responses to his Freedom of Information requests.

After a five-year struggle, he obtained more than 1,000 official documents which -- how to say this -- do not reflect well on the peerage, the captains of the oil industry, and the government of Tony Blair.

On April 19, the British Independent published a major story about these disclosures, which America's FCM have avoided like the plague.

Quoting the released British documents, the Independent showed BP salivating over an expected windfall of Iraqi oil, with the saliva politely sponged up by Foreign Office functionaries. From the Independent:

"The Foreign Office invited BP in on 6 November 2002 to talk about opportunities in Iraq 'post regime change.' Its minutes state: 'Iraq is the big oil prospect. BP is desperate to get in there.'

"Whereas BP was insisting in public that it had 'no strategic interest' in Iraq, in private it told the Foreign Office that Iraq was 'more important than anything we've seen for a long time' it [BP] was willing to take 'big risks' to get a share of the Iraqi reserves, the second largest in the world."

- Advertisement -

Of course, BP was singing a different tune for the average folks. Lord Browne, then-BP chief executive, insisted on March 12, 2003, a week before the invasion of Iraq: "It is not, in my or BP's opinion, a war about oil."

The official documents, however, offer a contradictory account. Gosh, would BP officials lie?

The minutes of a similar meeting with BP and Shell on Oct. 31, 2002, reinforce the point. They show then-British Trade Minister, Lady Symons, agreeing that British oil companies must not lose out in competing for Iraqi oil, particularly "if the U.K. had itself been a conspicuous supporter of the U.S. government throughout the crisis."

Prime Minister Tony Blair was equally disingenuous in his public remarks. On April 19, Democracy Now ran a brief clip in which British author Muttitt called to mind Blair's assurances to a TV audience on Feb. 6, 2003, six weeks before the war: "The idea that we're interested in Iraq's oil is absurd, it's one of the most absurd conspiracy theories you can imagine."

Muttitt pointed out that, as Blair was saying this, a secret (until now) Foreign Office document setting out British strategy toward Iraqi oil asserted, "Britain has an absolutely vital interest in Iraq's oil."

- Advertisement -

The London Mail Online on April 20 summed up the contradictions with classic English understatement. It noted that the flurry of meetings between oil executives and the Labour government in late 2002 "appear to be at odds with their insistence Iraq's vast oil reserves were not a consideration ahead of the March 2003 invasion."

Back in Washington

America's FCM have yet to acknowledge this latest embarrassment of how fully its prominent members were wrong about this oil issue as they queued up behind the Bush/Blair invasion in 2002-2003. Top pundits echoed Blair's dismissal of the oil motive as a "conspiracy theory."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). His (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What's Hayden Hidin'?

Asylum for Julian Assange -- Former Awardee for Integrity

Petraeus Cons Obama on Afghan War

Obama Stands Up to Israel, Tamps Down Iran War Threats

Mullen Wary of Israeli Attack on Iran

Note to Nancy Pelosi: Colin Powell Got Snookered at CIA, too

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Before Bush started calling the invasion of Iraq "... by Stephen Hansen on Saturday, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:31:17 PM
If we the people wouldn't vote for these wars the ... by Steven G. Erickson on Saturday, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:52:09 PM
Money buys most big name candidate. They have mill... by Samson on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:16:07 PM
reprise are too disgusting to fathom. That a monst... by Archie on Saturday, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:40:21 PM
If their is a Third World Country out there that h... by greg timmons on Sunday, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:44:46 AM
Good idea. I'll go sign that.But, such a petition ... by Samson on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:31:48 PM
I beg to disagree Mr. McGovern. The Iraq war not A... by syed mahdi on Sunday, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:39:43 PM
That wasn't a hard on.It was a codpiece.... by zonie on Sunday, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:06:54 PM
Anybody notice what Libya exports?... by Vernon Huffman on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:17:46 AM
While this is excellent information, I'm not fond ... by Samson on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:10:27 PM
Meanwhile, when trying to stir up public support, ... by Samson on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:22:01 PM
Or, you can see the same connections in reverse. ... by Samson on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:40:32 PM