Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 27, 2009 at 00:43:44

Must Read 1   News 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/27/09:

Sotomayor Nomination - GOP says Latino Values not right for Supreme Court

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Steven Leser (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Steven Leser - Writer


Judge Sonia Sotomayor

While most of us hoped it would not be so, it took less than 24 hours for Republicans to start attacking the race of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. The Judicial Confirmation Network, a Republican organization created to promote Republican nominees to the Supreme Court, sent out a press release attacking Judge Sotomayor as a "Liberal Judicial Activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important than the law as written."

Hearing that, you might ask yourself, "What is Judge Sotomayor's 'personal political agenda?'" (or at least, what does the Judicial Confirmation Network think is her agenda)

The Judicial Confirmation Network sent out Wendy Long to do the talk show circuit to explain what that is. She hit Fox News Tuesday morning and by Tuesday evening, she was on CNN's AC360 attacking Judge Sotomayor by saying:

"She herself has said that she thinks it is appropriate for her to make decisions as a Latina woman, from that perspective bringing to bear those demographics on her decision making."

Ms. Long went on to spout additional craziness about Sotomayor, but look at what she led with. I can tell you as someone who has been on political talk shows on national cable channels a few times now that you lead with your most important point first because you don't know how much time you are going to get to say anything else. Keeping that in mind, according to Wendy Long, the Judicial Confirmation Network and by extension, the Republican Party, the most compelling negative point they have about Sonia Sotomayor is that she is a Latina woman and comes from that background and has that perspective.

I have DVR (for those of you not familiar with DVR, it is a technology like TIVO that allows one to record TV channels from cable television) at home and after I heard Ms. Long say that, I hit record and rewound it and listened to it several times to make sure I got it right. It took four or five replays to make me believe I heard correctly. For those of you reading this, pause here and reread what she said a few times and think about it. The Republican Party has declared war on Latinos and Latino values. Of course, those of us who have studied the Republican Party already knew that it is an organization that hates minorities but they are usually more subtle about it than this. I can just imagine members of racist hate groups sitting around their TV sets watching this statement being made by Wendy Long and saying "Whoa now, take it easy lady!"

All kidding aside, as a Latino, I am extremely offended by what Ms. Long said. I expected the regular silliness from Republicans about "Liberal activist judge, blah, blah, blah" but to attack Judge Sotomayor because she is a Latina woman and comes from that perspective is not even making an attempt to hide the racism. Wendy Long and the Judicial Confirmation Network should apologize for having said that and they ought to sit down and shut up for the remainder of the process.

Not being happy with one major miscue in a day, the Republican Party made it a twofer by mailing to various journalists the anti-Sotomayor talking points intended for GOP operatives only. As reported in "The Hill's Blog Briefing Room", see http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/05/26/rnc-fumbles-sotomayor-talking-points/ , here are some of the points:

.
.
.

o To be clear, Republicans do not view this nomination without concern. Judge Sotomayor has received praise and high ratings from liberal special interest groups. Judge Sotomayor has also said that policy is made on the U.S. Court of Appeals.

.
.
.

o Liberal ideology, not legal qualification, is likely to guide the president's choice of judicial nominees.

o Obama has said his criterion for nominating judges would be their "heart" and "empathy."

o Obama said he believes Supreme Court justices should understand the Court's role "to protect people who may be vulnerable in the political process."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

An OEN Editor, Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations. Steven Leser (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

The GOP Should Caucus at Gitmo by Jason Paz on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 3:18:51 AM
The ruckus you speak about ......... by Ernest on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 3:25:14 AM
Monarch? by Maxwell on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 8:28:34 PM
GOP values by Trailing Begonia on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 8:31:57 AM
Judge Sotomayor's statement... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 9:03:56 AM
Sure, but why don't we just agree that everything the GOP by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 12:16:14 PM
One has to... by Jennifer Hathaway on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 12:35:53 PM
Not that was funny .... by E. Nelson on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 2:07:19 PM
I find myself agreeing with the GOP by steve scheetz on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 12:51:27 PM
Stating the Obvious has now become Liberal Activism by E. Nelson on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 2:20:03 PM
I stand my my statement by steve scheetz on Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 7:57:34 AM
Wrong AND stupid strategy! by Jim Finley on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 1:26:21 PM
& Republican blather is worth listening to.... by Darren Wolfe on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 1:34:33 PM
GOP divisiveness and hate by E. Nelson on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 2:03:06 PM
Her "race" should have never been anounced. by Gallaher on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 2:42:31 PM
Judgepedia by Jennifer Hathaway on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 2:54:54 PM
GOP & the Heartless Court by Theresa "Darklady" Reed on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 3:24:27 PM
This libel will not go unanswered by Scott on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 10:44:42 PM
I posted a direct quote. Do you want me to upload a clip? by Steven Leser on Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 9:48:12 AM
Empathy by Mad Jayhawk on Friday, May 29, 2009 at 10:43:55 PM
Empathy by Mad Jayhawk on Friday, May 29, 2009 at 10:46:16 PM
She should go to prison by Gallaher on Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 1:50:17 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum