Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 5 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (7 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments, 3 series

Life Arts

Robert Reich and his new film, "Inequality for All" - An In-Depth Interview

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/2/13

Become a Fan
  (71 fans)

film art by "Inequality for All" website
 

My guest today is economist,Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and former Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich. 

JB: Welcome back to OpEdNews, Bob. Over the years you've written 13 books. Now, with Inequality for All, you've ventured onto the Big Screen. What was appealing about this change of medium?

RR: Well, I've tried everything else. I mean, I've written lots of books, and done quite a bit of television. And the situation keeps getting worse -- with more and more of the nation's wealth and income in the hands of a smaller and smaller number of people. So when Jake Kornbluth, the director of "Inequality for All," approached me with his proposal, I accepted right away. (Of course, I had no idea how hard it would be to create a movie!)

JB: You're definitely the star of the film [or should I say, you and your mini Cooper?].  Did you also have a lot of input regarding what went into the film?

RR: A lot of input into the substantive part of the film -- the argument about what's happened to American wealth and incomes, why it's happened, and why it's a problem for the economy and our democracy. The arguments track those I made in my book Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future . But I didn't have much input into the parts of the film that are more biographical. In fact, I wasn't particularly comfortable with Jake (the film's director) using as much personal material as he wanted to use, and we had an ongoing negotiation about it. He argued that the biographical stuff was important, in terms of viewers relating emotionally to the film. I argued back that it was only tangentially related to the issue of widening inequality. In any event, we reached a compromise, as you can see in the film.

JB: If you're talking about how you were bullied as a child and that made you adamant about wanting to protect the vulnerable, I'm with Jake! It did help personalize the issue. What exactly did you hope to accomplish that you haven't been able to with your books, appearances on television and public radio, college lectures?  As you point out, you've been at it for 30 years and economic inequality has only gotten worse.

RR: There's something about the experience of watching a movie or video that enables viewers to connect emotionally with an issue -- and therefore open their minds to it -- more readily than they often can through reading a book or an article. At least that's what I've been lead to conclude, somewhat reluctantly, given that I spend most of my time writing!


JB: I wholeheartedly agree with that. My own activism for election integrity stems directly from watching the documentary   Invisible Ballots, [about the dangers of computerized voting] back in the summer of 2005. It's early days yet, the movie was just released last week. But do you have any sense of how it's being received so far ?


RR: I'm told that it's doing extremely well -- exceeding all expectations.


Reich by Robert Reich




JB: Excellent. Let's get down to specifics about the film now. One of the strengths of Inequality for All is the use of animated graphics, for example,  the suspension bridge imagery. Can you give some of the facts that the bridge graphic so vividly illustrates?


RR: The two peak years for income inequality over the past century were 1928 and 2007 -- in which the top 1 percent received over 23 percent of total income. In 1929 and 2008, the economy crashed. Why? Because when so much income is concentrated at the top, the vast middle class (and all those who aspire to join it) simply don't have the purchasing power to keep the economy going, without themselves going deep into debt. Eventually those debt bubbles burst (1929 and 2008), and when they do so, the economy goes into deep recession. The only reason the Great Recession wasn't as deep or as long as the Great Depression was we knew enough to stimulate the economy, and the Fed kept interest rates down. But these were and are only temporary band-aids. The underlying structural problem remains.


JB: Are there really enough parallels between 1928 and 2007  to make the suspension bridge  a viable analogy? Or did you have to stretch or tweak the facts to get it to fit?


RR: Actually, the parallels are quite close -- not only with regard to income and debt, but also political divisiveness. The big difference, of course, was that the Depression was so deep that FDR could summon the political will for major reform. Ironically, the Great Recession wasn't nearly as deep -- because we used fiscal and monetary policy to cushion the economy -- so there hasn't been the political will for major reforms. As a result, the second tower of the suspension bridge is getting taller again.

JB: Back to basics for a  moment, Bob. What's so bad about income inequality? Isn't it built into capitalism?


RR: Some inequality is both inevitable and desirable -- desirable if people are to have enough incentive to work hard, invent, and innovate. The real issue isn't inequality per se. It's whether we're getting to a level of inequality -- a degree of concentration of income and wealth in a relatively few hands, with the median family on a downward escalator -- that hurts our economy, democracy, and society. I believe we are.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author79.html

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I wished she'd asked him why he was a part of push... by Samson on Wednesday, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:06:34 PM
Good interview, but I too wish Reich had offered m... by Scott Baker on Thursday, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:08:38 AM
The website has various action plans with specific... by Joan Brunwasser on Thursday, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:19:08 AM
Unfortunately, none of this will get rid of rent-s... by Scott Baker on Thursday, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:23:46 PM
Are there really enough parallels between 1928 an... by Ethan Hollow on Saturday, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:32:33 AM
In Brunei... by Ethan Hollow on Saturday, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:48:48 AM
".. It is not just a coincidence that tax cuts fo... by Lance Brofman on Sunday, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:22:58 AM