Life Arts

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 4   Must Read 3   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 1/25/10

Become a Fan
  (74 fans)
- Advertisement -

Howard Zinn is a historian, author, social activist, and American icon. His book A People's History of the United States has sold over two million copies. Welcome back to OpEdNews, Howard. The dust has had a chance to settle a bit since last month's airing of your documentary "The People Speak." What kind of feedback have you gotten so far?

We've received lots of nice messages on "The People Speak." The History Channel tells us that eight million people have seen part or all of the film, and two million on the first night it was shown (apparently they have no way of telling if a viewer cuts out on the program). It will be on the History Channel again February 22nd and March 1st.

That's impressive and must be gratifying for all of you involved in the project. There's still another half hour of new material in the DVD that is being released next month, correct? What haven't we seen yet?

Yes, Joan, the History Channel program is 90 minutes, the DVD two hours. A bunch of readings we had no room for in the TV version: Marisa Tomei reading a Lowell mill girl of the 1830s, Benjamin Bratt reading an ex-slave responding to his master who wants him back, Danny Glover reading a black state legislator in Georgia responding to his expulsion from the legislature, Kerry Washington reading Fannie Lou Hamer, Marisa reading Cindy Sheehan, Sean Penn reading Kevin Tillman (brother of football star Pat Tillman killed in Afghanistan). And more, including the singer Pink with her song, "Dear Mr. President."

I read that there was a huge amount, something like 97 hours, of raw footage. So much wonderful material ended up on the cutting room floor. How ever did you decide what went in?

A big question. We wanted the most dramatic readings, and the ones most relevant to what is happening today.

I'm sure that generated some lively discussions. In the film, you touched on the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, penned only a few years later. I'd like to know more. Why was there a shift in the attitude of the framers of the Constitution?

- Advertisement -

No change of attitude. One was a manifesto, rhetoric to rally people. The other a legal document, expressing their real desires.

This small but important difference seemed to signify something larger. The Declaration's original phrasing "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" was tweaked, becoming "life, liberty and property" in the Constitution, neatly encapsulating the tension between democratic and aristocratic principles. That tension continues to this day. We may not have landed gentry and inherited titles on these shores but we do have Big Business, which consistently rides roughshod over the interests of the rest of society. On that note, would you like to comment on the Supreme Court's decision last week to strike down corporate campaign finance limits?

Liberals get excited about things like that as if they signal a dramatic change. No, the corporations ran our elections before the decision and will do so now -- just with a fig leaf of "legality." The designation of corporations as "persons" which started in 1886 is just proof of how our legal system, the Constitution, the courts have always been tools of the wealthy classes.

The more things change, the more they stay the same. You lived through WWII. Although you were fighting overseas, your family and everyone else were part of the American war effort. They had ration cards, did metal drives, planted Victory Gardens. There was a real feeling that we were all in this together. What we have now is something else entirely. It started when Pres. Bush told everyone to help the fight against terrorism by going shopping. Something vital has been lost. Can you comment on that?

Of course, both soldiers and civilians at that time had either a strong (mine) or a vague (my fellow crew members) sense of a just war. Yes, it was much different from now. But as you probably know, in retrospect, our view was simplistic - (you know my talk THREE HOLY WARS and my view of WWII expressed in my writings?)

- Advertisement -

[Note: I wasn't familiar with "Three Holy Wars" so I just went and read it. I recommend it to our readers, who can also watch the video of this 2009 speech. In it, Zinn says that we can't even give what we consider "just wars" (the Revolutionary War, Civil War, and WWII) a pass. That there is a distinction between just causes and just wars. We need to be willing to ask hard questions like: was there another way, other than war, to achieve that goal? What was actually achieved? And, at what cost? As time passes, it becomes harder and harder to do that. Trust Howard to give us a fresh way to look at old, accepted ideas. Now, back to the interview...]

On the international front, Haiti recently suffered a devastating earthquake. At this point, we still don't know how many people died as rescue and medical efforts continue. Americans have a notoriously short attention span and aren't generally interested in other nations' history. If we were to look beyond the corruption of Duvalier father and son, we would see that America had a hand in making Haiti what it is today, wouldn't we?

Haiti is one of the most shameful episodes in U.S. foreign policy because Haiti is a neighbor (as is Cuba, where a similar relationship has persisted) and we have treated Haiti with cruelty all through our history. When it became the first independent black Republic in this hemisphere, defeating the Napoleonic army, the administration of Thomas Jefferson (ironically, author of our Declaration of Independence) refused to recognize it.

Next Page  1  |  2

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You could have done the left and nations like Hait... by Peter Warner on Monday, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:17:42 PM
Zinn is a Man who really cares. Its too bad "THEY"... by Michael Dewey on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:05:51 PM
We Americans do love our movie stars, and I had no... by GLloyd Rowsey on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:09:17 AM
has affected millions, literally. how many history... by Joan Brunwasser on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:49:58 AM
Howard Zinn is one of my heroes. His book changed ... by Sally Davis on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:05:25 AM
Someone named Kurt Vonnagut I think said if god wa... by Michael Dewey on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:09:10 PM
As always, Howard is one of our best historians in... by B. Ross Ashley on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:11:30 AM
Howard tells things as they are in this complicate... by Michael Dewey on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:10:47 PM
This is by far one of the most interesting and inf... by Ron Talley on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:00:00 PM
high praise indeed. thank you.if you feel so stron... by Joan Brunwasser on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:08:55 PM
thanks Joan so much for doing this interview, At t... by MJ Creech on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:07:33 PM
...forefront. Iagree with Howard's acessment conce... by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:42:39 PM
You need to read Robt. Stinnett's "Day of Deceit".... by Richard Pietrasz on Wednesday, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:32:44 PM
...concerning the recent supreme court ruling. The... by Michael Shaw on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:12:25 PM
i have read about that, particularly by Greg Palas... by Joan Brunwasser on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:07:46 PM
I understand congressional legislation is being pr... by Michael Shaw on Wednesday, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:19:31 PM
We must force our American Leaders to listen to th... by Michael Dewey on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:57:52 PM
Any substantive article on Zinn is important! I d... by Bob Bogen on Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:04:27 PM
And his dear wife died in 2008. We can hope they'r... by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:52:14 AM
Zinn was a Truthteller and a hero for the people! ... by Bia Winter on Thursday, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:54:08 AM
I'm afraid words are one thing, and actions anothe... by jdialo on Thursday, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:14:01 PM
thanks!... by Joan Brunwasser on Thursday, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:43:27 PM