Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
October 9, 2009 at 04:55:26

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Revolution is Not Just a Word, but Why Revolt?

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By R. A. Louis (about the author)     Page 1 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: R. A. Louis - Writer

Revolution is not a word often used today in the meaningful way that it was in the past. The mildest reform or a new safety net put in place is often considered revolutionary. Advertisers of the latest product frivolously use the word in a way that nevertheless seems to subconsciously convey the inspirational meaning it had in the past. Smug academics and mainstream political partisans seem to scoff at the idea that a true revolution of values could occur by means of actual revolutionary activity. Others are so placated by the modern bread and circuses that they fail to notice growing crisis all around them.

This article is written with the intention of showing why a revolution is necessary and offers suggestions about how to make one manifest in practical reality.

Why Revolt?


With a little searching on Youtube (or another less-censored site) you will find a near endless stream of videos documenting elderly people getting tazed and having their skulls cracked by the police. You'll find videos of little girls getting beaten and maced by male-bodied pigs. Despite censorship, you'll even find videos of cold-blooded murder at the hands of the police. Mind you... this is merely what gets caught on video -- and represents only a very small fraction of the police violence that takes place every single day in the USA).


In addition to the street-level violence, the police forces in the United States then help incarcerate more people at a rate seen nowhere else on earth. More people are imprisoned in the U.S. than in any other nation (both in total numbers AND per-capita). Millions of people get cycled through the U.S. prison-industrial complex every year. No nation on earth imprisons more people than the "land of the free."

America, the USA, is THE police state, and the extreme subjugation of millions of individuals is big business -- entire towns now spring up around large prisons (complete with motels for visiting relatives and services and shops for the prison employees), and that's on top of the economics involved with the court systems and police equipment.



Environmental Degradation

The extent of environmental degradation is almost too overwhelming to even begin considering. However, without facing the problems collectively a person can't effectively understand the systemic quality of the multitude of threats facing the biosphere.

Dealing with just one problem at a time can leave us vulnerable to another advancing disaster. The idea that one problem can be reformed away then becomes muted because the process of reform generally does not, and can not, deal with several major issues at once. As ineffectual as reform efforts have been at dealing with the issue of global warming, for example, imagine how much more difficult those reform efforts become if they concurrently or simultaneously addressed the issues of deforestation, the Pacific garbage vortex, strip-mining, desertification, dioxin releases, the 6th extinction, et cetera, etc. In the face of such a collective crisis, the slow road of piecemeal reformism will not protect life on earth.

Similarly, the idea of setting a personal example (in terms of personal consumption) does not guarantee the preservation of life on earth. It's a quaint idea, but one that looks to the realm of spiritualism and blind faith, rather than at reality. Even if a good example was set and followed, in terms of consumption, there is no guarantee that enough people would follow it or that those who didn't wouldn't pick up the slack. Like reformism, personal lifestyle choices do play a part in terms of preserving the environment. The problem is that people are not looking beyond themselves at the complete issue of how much damage is being done by other organizations that are not curbing their overall destruction at all. Directly putting a stop, by any environmentally sound means necessary, to major polluters or sources of destruction, can be far more effective than large groups of individuals ceasing their personally destructive activities in the spiritual hopes than everyone else will follow suit.



A Variety of Wars and Their Consequences

The depletion of natural resources is a primary cause for wars. And I'm not even referring yet to fuels and mineral products used for production and consumption purposes -- I'm talking about things like fresh potable water, land, and clean air. As the world population continues to grow, access to the basic necessities of life becomes more difficult and attempts to acquire those things become more desperate on an individual and a collective level.

Obviously, the connection between militarism and environmental degradation is clear. But this fact is easily clouded by other pretenses for war such as archaic ethnic conflicts and the desire for fuels & mineral products used for production and consumption purposes. What then gets overlooked with this situation is that the preservation and defense of natural resources at local levels can prevent some causes of war.

But aside from necessities, wars undertaken by the U.S. today are largely about petroleum oil. High ranking public officials have been blunt about this, and if anyone still has doubts about this they are simple-minded (to put it nicely).

The U.S. government spends incredible amounts on it's military
. Having paid for it's gigantic army, it now needs fuel. Faced with peak oil (another idea ought to be easily and clearly understood), the wars in foreign lands are not about liberating the people there or fighting international terrorism. The wars in the Middle East are not even about maintaining relatively cheap oil for SUV drivers. The wars are about securing fuel for the military machine that's already been bought and paid for. In the final analysis, the U.S. government plans on having the only army which still has fuel to wage a total war. At that point, the U.S. will be an empire more destructive and brutal than any other in history (even to a greater extent than it already has been).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Ray Louis is an aging, burnt-out, radical activist. He is of the opinion that most people have no idea how harsh and brutal the government is because they have never really done anything to resist or oppose it. While he doesn't at all engage in the (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Activism Empire"
Theory's Empire: An Anthology of Dissent

$82.50

Number of pages: 736
Publisher: Columbia University Press

German Women for Empire, 1884–1945 (Politics, History, and Culture)
by Lora Wildenthal

$84.95

Number of pages: 352
Publisher: Duke University Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Thank you for a great article by Margaret Bassett on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:43:05 AM
Prison for accessing elected officials? by Steven G. Erickson on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:12:01 AM
Thank you Margaret! by R. A. Louis on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:17:12 AM
Another You Tube by Eileen Fleming on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:59:52 AM
The 2nd American Revolution by Steven G. Erickson on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:26:15 AM
I'd be all in favor of a general strike! by R. A. Louis on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:20:41 PM
Do you know what floats in flood by BFalcon on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:38:30 AM
A Revolution of Thought by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:06:38 PM
When the Living Dead Arise by Patrick on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:33:04 PM
Revolution? by Abbas Sadeghian, Ph.D. on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:55:30 PM
Interesting, but... by Undercover Citizen on Friday, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:10:44 PM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum