Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
15 comments
   
OpEdNews Op Eds

Pundits Trying to Help Cheney Avoid Jail

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H1 8/14/09
Become a Fan
  (134 fans)

opednews.com

This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

The stenographers of the Fawning Corporate Media (FCM) are missing the most obvious explanation for former Vice President Dick Cheney's widely reported "disappointment" with former President George W. Bush on the issue of pardons - self-interest.

Barton Gellman of the Washington Post has now joined feature writers from Time in aping Cheney's hagiographer in chief, Stephen Hayes of The Weekly Standard. They all choose to dote on Cheney's loyalty to his former chief of staff, Irv Lewis "Scooter" Libby, while ignoring reasons why Cheney might have hoped for a presidential pardon himself.

Gellman is a talented journalist with a tainted record. He wrote a truly shameless article for the Post when it was competing with The New York Times for cheerleading laurels prior to the war on Iraq.

First Leak It; Then Confirm It

Remember those dangerous sounding "aluminum tubes" said to be procured by Iraq to develop a nuclear bomb - the ones that turned out to be for conventional artillery? The Bush administration tasked the Times' Judith Miller and Michael Gordon to push the canard that the tubes' technical properties showed the intended use to be as casings for rotors in centrifuges to enrich uranium, a key step in producing a nuclear bomb. The pair rose to the occasion with flair.

The Times front-paged their story on Sunday, Sept. 8, 2002; and on the morning talk shows Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice all referred to the Times story. The ploy worked like a charm. None of the talk show hosts dared ask an impolite question - like who gave the information to the Times.

The Post's Gellman was suborned into doing a similar story on chemical weapons in the fall of 2002, when the White House was fuming at recalcitrant analysts in both the Defense Intelligence Agency and the CIA. The not-yet-corrupted intelligence analysts still there could simply not get the hang of it. They were having a hard time, sans evidence, in producing faith-based intelligence on "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq.

DIA had issued a formal report saying there was no evidence of active chemical or biological weapons programs. And CIA analysts could find no credible evidence of meaningful ties between Iraq and al Qaeda, despite the extreme pressure to find some. (The CIA ombudsman told the Senate Intelligence Committee there occurred a "hammering" of analysts more severe than any he had seen in his 32-year career in the analysis directorate.)

Gellman to the Rescue

On Dec. 12, 2002, the Post front-paged a Gellman report that "Islamic extremists affiliated with al Qaeda took possession of a chemical weapon in Iraq last month or in late October." The story was attributed to "two officials with firsthand knowledge of the report and its source."

Lest any readers miss the import, Gellman stressed that, if true, this "would be the most concrete evidence to support the charge, aired for months by President Bush and his advisers, that al Qaeda terrorists receive material assistance in Iraq." The next 27 paragraphs of Gellman's story were so laden with caveats and the subjunctive mood that they brought to mind Alice's plaintive cry in Wonderland:

"There is no use trying, said Alice; one can't believe impossible things. I dare say you haven't had much practice, said the Queen. When I was your age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

The Dec. 12, 2002 Post article drew loud complaints, including from the paper's ombudsman, Michael Getler, who asked: "What, after all, is the use of this story that practically begs you not to put much credence in it? Why was it so prominently displayed, and why not wait until there was more certainty about the intelligence?"

Come on, Getler; you know why. Bush and Cheney were scraping for evidence to "justify" attacking Iraq. Gellman and your paper were happy to oblige.

Having proved his mettle, Gellman was able to acquire the kind of access to Cheney and his palace guard that would enable him to write a useful book, Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency, with some stunning revelations.

Cheney Lied to House Majority Leader

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

 

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). His (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What's Hayden Hidin'?

Asylum for Julian Assange -- Former Awardee for Integrity

Petraeus Cons Obama on Afghan War

Obama Stands Up to Israel, Tamps Down Iran War Threats

Mullen Wary of Israeli Attack on Iran

Note to Nancy Pelosi: Colin Powell Got Snookered at CIA, too

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Yes, the fear is that you may be right. But then g... by Nathan Nahm on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:05:42 AM
Since Nancy took Bush's impeachment off the table,... by JHendrix on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:21:02 AM
I have taken the same approach concerning Nancy an... by GUY P. FRASER on Monday, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:42:53 AM
steal their oil... by GUY P. FRASER on Monday, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:02:12 AM
talking about importance of rule of law when prose... by luckydjw on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:39:16 AM
Cheney/Bush and their personal fallout >>SO... by Carte Dumonde on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:20:18 AM
Until we understand what Alex Jones has been sayin... by ronheri on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:37:34 AM
On the morning of 9/11 a military aide approaches ... by Lance Ciepiela on Saturday, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:35:20 PM
There will be no 9/11 investigation with this admi... by ronheri on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:35:17 AM
Two some extent, but I assure you,not equally... by GUY P. FRASER on Monday, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:09:42 AM
except our own guilt for lack of interest, lack of... by Nick van Nes on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:42:25 AM
... we ALL have had this problem since day one in ... by Professor Fandel on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:35:04 AM
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVChNmN9y7E... by Gallaher on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:09:07 PM
I watched the chilling video. I think the governme... by ronheri on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:28:11 PM
Lets forget all the stories,the comments,reasons,B... by GUY P. FRASER on Monday, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:20:22 AM