Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 9   Well Said 9   Valuable 7   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 4/9/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (37 comments)

Our Lives Are Under Threat From Some of the Most Powerful and Richest Entities -- Here's How We Can Fight Back and Win

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (43 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

This article was co-written by Bill McKibben


Not for forty years has there been such a stretch of bad news for environmentalists in Washington.

Last month in the House, the newly empowered GOP majority voted down a resolution stating simply that global warming was real: they've apparently decided to go with their own versions of physics and chemistry.

This week in the Senate, the biggest environmental groups were reduced to a noble, bare-knuckles fight merely to keep the body from gutting the Clean Air Act, the proudest achievement of the green movement. The outcome is still unclear; even several prominent Democrats are trying to keep the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases.

And at the White House? The president who boasted that his election marked the moment when "the oceans begin to recede" instead introduced an energy plan heavy on precisely the carbon fuels driving global warming. He focused on "energy independence," a theme underscored by his decision to open 750-million tons of Wyoming coal to new mining leases. That's the equivalent of running 3,000 new power plants for a year.

Here's what we think is going on, in the broadest terms.

The modern environmental movement was born on Earth Day 1970, in an unprecedented burst of mass organizing -- by some estimates 20-million Americans, a tenth of the population, took to the streets. It was a young movement, at a time when large numbers of people were serious about not just cleaning the air but stopping wars and ending official discrimination. That popular base inspired -- or, more likely, cowed -- Washington: the next four years saw the passage of virtually all the environmental legislation that still forms the core of green law.

It also saw the birth, or rebirth, of many of the organizations we think of when we think of environmentalism. Powered by that initial burst of mass support, they were able to make real headway in DC, and so they concentrated on important and professional tasks: patient lobbying of subcommittees, careful report-writing. And they kept making substantial gains: Superfund toxic cleanups, acid-rain control.

But in recent years two things have happened. One, that battery wound up on the first Earth Day has finally wound down: congressmen, it turns out, can tell the difference between an aging membership list and a vibrant political movement. As the DC political bible Politico put it last month: "green groups are being forced to play defense in a world where D.C. pols aren't scared of them."

Second, the key issue has changed. Forget acid rain and Superfund; these were important but relatively easy fights that didn't directly confront anyone's business model. You could clean up acid rain by putting a filter on your power plant. But global warming is different -- you'd have to shut down that power plant, and replace it with a windmill or a solar panel.

And so the full power of the fossil fuel industry -- the most profitable business in the planet's history -- has been brought to bear on the fight, and they play hard and dirty. The Koch Brothers spend huge sums to underwrite the network of global warming skeptics; the US Chamber of Commerce emerged as the biggest campaign funder of them all, shuttling 94% of its donations to climate deniers.

This kind of clout carried the day: the biggest dream of DC Washington groups was the so-called "cap-and-trade" bill, behind which they mustered every insider technique they'd spent the last four decades perfecting. But in the end they didn't come close: Harry Reid refused to even schedule a floor vote, knowing that he was far short of the votes needed to pass the bill. The White House stayed on the sidelines.

To us, the lesson is pretty clear. Since we're never going to have as much money as the fossil fuel industry, we need to rebuild the kind of mass movement that marked 1970: bodies, passion, and creativity are the currencies we can compete in. It's not impossible. Working with next to no money, the fledgling campaign at 350.org managed over the last three years to coordinate 15,000 rallies in 189 countries -- every nation on earth save North Korea. It's been active in every US state and Congressional district. And this week, it combined forces with another important American grass roots climate campaign, 1Sky, for extra reach.

1Sky was founded in the same spirit, and at the same time, as 350.org, and has worked to develop leaders around the country and help build a base of hundreds of allies. Together, we'll be smarter, bolder, faster, and more creative than we were before.

This new and expanded 350.org will mobilize on a large scale -- circle Sept. 24 on your calendar for a worldwide day of bike-based action. But it's also going aggressively after the backroom money, with a far-reaching new campaign that tackles the US Chamber of Commerce for its climate stance.

This youth-based campaign is linking up with labor, with faith communities, with frontline communities who have the most experience trying to shut down dirty power plants in their backyards. Most of all, it's actually out in the streets, organizing new blood. The idea is not to supplant the Washington green groups, but instead to give the whole movement new clout -- enough clout to withstand the crushing power of oil money. And enough energy to let us get off defense and back on the attack.

We don't know if we'll win in the end: the science of climate change grows darker by the day, and the window for effective action is swiftly closing. But any chance requires people power replacing corporate power. In the year of Tunisia and Egypt and Wisconsin, it's worth a try.

 

http://www.naomiklein.org

Naomi Klein is the author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, now out in paperback. To read all her latest writing visit www.naomiklein.org

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
37 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Remove the CO2 and begin environmental stewardship anew. by Meme Mine on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:07:01 PM
environmentalist or teabagger troll? by Rob Kall on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:11:37 PM
Remembering Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, a 1962 book. by Eugene Nunn on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 5:12:21 PM
Victories by Meme Mine on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:41:43 PM
Your trolling no good here by Adam Smith on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:52:07 PM
Please explain why plants grow well in glass houses by Jeff Poster on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:59:52 PM
Good for you... by George Strain on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:37:31 AM
Plants in Glasshouses by David Chester on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:46:55 AM
One more issue by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:52:49 PM
What do you think is ok as is? by Jeff Poster on Saturday, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:50:18 PM
To be honest Jeff.... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:14:33 AM
ha ha ha by Ned Lud on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:40:23 AM
Are you trying to rain on the parade? by Mike Preston on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:02:59 PM
chained reaction by Ned Lud on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:23:18 AM
The CA$H DriveN Political System Is The Barrier! by John Russell on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:52:55 AM
The irony of it all is... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:07:49 AM
styx by Ned Lud on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:41:51 AM
Absolutely *NOTHING* will fix our system by Jack Lohman on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:28:46 AM
Agreed, But The Real Problem is MONEY! by John Russell on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:38:12 AM
Things to change by Keith Pope on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:12:28 AM
The U.S. will have to be dragged by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:45:34 AM
(post-coffee) by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:23:53 PM
I think it's time for the East to rise by Adam Smith on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:06:49 PM
love ya, Naomi by martin weiss on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:16:03 PM
Naomi Klein's Justifiable Warning by Beverlee Couillard on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:50:27 PM
Doc Ole Codger Is The PERFECT Example... by John Russell on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:30:42 PM
Damn John... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Sunday, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:09:11 PM
Bolivia's Law of Mother Earth by George Ripley on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:21:35 AM
Absolute Insanity by Adam Scott on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:22:52 AM
Not So by Maxwell on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:58 AM
Make money in your own home! by Jim Arnold on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:37:50 AM
Please explain why plants grow well in glass houses by Jeff Poster on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:15:27 PM
because - by Jim Arnold on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:22:30 PM
Because people take care to water, feed, & ventilate them, by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15:20 PM
Naomi Klein- a socially engineered tool for the Globalists ? by Billy Freedom on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:22:26 PM
Yeah..... by Yggdrasil on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:35:10 PM
Billy, why do plants grow so well in glass houses ? by Jeff Poster on Monday, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:19:48 PM