OpEdNews Op Eds

It's Time for Kucinich, Conyers, Feingold and Other 'Progressives' in Congress to Take a Stand

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 9   Must Read 7   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 1/21/10

Become a Fan
  (58 fans)

By Dave Lindorff

What's missing in Congress these days is real progressive leadership and real political courage.

Over the past several decades, the Democratic Party has been entirely taken over by corporate shills and money-grubbing sleazes while those who might still have some vestigial remnant of a conscience or genuine concern for the plight of the common person have been co-opted or intimidated into silence or powerlessness.

Look at Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). He says all the right things. He's fought all the good fights. And yet after 15 years in Congress, he is chair of what? The House subcommittee on domestic policy of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Heck, his post doesn't even merit capitalization in the AP Stylebook! And when he submits an important bill, like his articles of impeachment of both former President George W. Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney, he can't even get a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee.

Which, of course, is chaired by another long-standing allegedly progressive House member, Rep. John Conyers (D-MI). Conyers, despite being chair of the House Progressive Caucus (the largest, and least powerful Democratic Party caucus in the Congress) and despite his having served 22 terms in the House, couldn't even manage to get "permission" from the Speaker (Rep. Nancy Pelosi--once a member of the Progressive Caucus!) to hold a hearing on impeachment during the Bush/Cheney years in the Judiciary Committee that he chairs. And more recently, he was even barred from having his own health reform proposal--an expansion of Medicare to cover all Americans--get a lousy hearing in the House.

Progressives in the Democratic Party are both joke and oxymoron.

It is time for any real progressives in House or Senate to admit the truth--that they are boxed in and effectively neutered by the Party leadership--and that if they really want to be defenders of the public interest and the progressive cause, they must give up their sinecures, cut themselves loose from the shackles of the Democratic Party, and form a new and independent national progressive party. They have a model: Bernie Sanders, the independent self-described socialist senator from Vermont. Of course, even Sanders is boxed in, given that he is alone in the Senate as an independent progressive , so that if he wants a committee assignment he has to agree to vote with the Democrats on the key issues of party control. But that is because there is nobody standing with him in the Senate.

This could change if the progressive caucus members of both houses were to quit the sell-out Democrats and form the nucleus of a new party, instead of just a caucus within the sclerotic and rancidly corrupt Democratic Party.

There is a huge ferment across the land. Americans of all political persuasions are angry, fearful, frustrated and ready for change. That's why so many of them voted for a black presidential candidate promising "real change" in 2008. The trouncing of Democratic senate candidate Martha Coakley this week in the Massachusetts special election to fill the seat of the late Sen. Edward Kennedy was a direct result of the anger that those same voters feel at being betrayed by that president, who instead of change has given them more of the same pro-corporate, anti-common-citizen politics that they were trying to escape.

We on the left know that nothing much is going to change in America until there is a genuine people's party on the ballot, but for years we have watched in despair as well-meaning third parties like Peace & Freedom, the Green Party, the Socialist Party-USA and others (including parties not on the left like the Libertarians) have tried and failed to become national political forces. These efforts have been stymied because American voters, sensibly, have not wanted to "waste their votes" by casting ballots for Third Party candidates who stand no chance of being elected. They have been stymied because Americans have either been forced to accept a "lesser of two evils" approach to voting, or to simply not vote.

But true progressives in Congress who have the advantage of incumbency--people like Kucinich, Conyers, Feingold and others--could run as independents, or better, as third party candidates and win. And if they were to choose to run as a new third party, they would open the door for many other new candidates to run with them. They would give legitimacy to the idea of voting for something other than a corrupt Republican or a corrupt Democrat.

Americans are not stupid. They recognize that the two big parties are both acting in collusion in selling them all out to monolithic corporate interests, and that Washington is thoroughly owned by the rich and the powerful. That's why only half of Americans even bother to vote (actually far fewer than that in off-year elections like the one coming up this November). And those who do vote, vote for major party candidates, for the most part not out of enthusiasm, but out of desperation.

If they had candidates on the ballot whom they really thought were on their side, and who really had a shot at winning, they would abandon the Democratic Party frauds in a heartbeat.

A secession by true progressives in Congress from the Democratic Party and the formation of a new party by that group of rebels--and remember, there are 80 members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus--would hit the Democratic Party like a perfectly placed explosive charge detonated in the foundation of an old building slated for demolition. The whole edifice would collapse in a cloud of smoke and dust. No Democratic incumbent would be safe. Upstart candidates would come out of the woodwork to challenge them from the left in virtually every state in the country. Republican candidates too would face real challenges, not from centrists, but from real left candidates.

Too much can be expected of electoral politics, and certainly, even in the highly improbable event that every member of the Progressive Caucus were to quit the Democrats, run for re-election as an independent or as the member of some new progressive party, and win the first time out, the dominant Democrats and Republicans and the corporate lobbyists behind them could still keep the government in the hands of the existing corporate power structure. But even if only some of the caucus were to bolt, the door would suddenly be open for a new national politics. Workers and their labor unions would no longer feel bound to support Democratic hacks, and many could be expected to shift their allegience and financial backing to the new party, as could environmentalists, health care reform advocates, anti-war activists, education reformers and all the other progressives who have had nowhere to turn politically for years.

So here's the call: If you have a so-called progressive as your Senator or Representative, tell him or her that you will no longer giver them your vote unless they first quit the Democratic Party.

Next Page  1  |  2


Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Free John Walker Lindh, Bush's and Cheney's First Torture Victim!

What Nobody's Saying: The Bailout Will Kill the Dollar


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 people are discussing this page, with 39 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I agree with everything said especially this part ... by Judi on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23:52 AM
Dave, I know you are concerned with the many progr... by Alan MacDonald on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:51:19 AM
A grouping of all people for human rights and nee... by Philip Dennany on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:54:00 PM
You mean, like the False-flag on 9/11?... by Bia Winter on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:27:58 PM
How two Republican senators (one from a family of ... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:40:10 PM
Dean's campaign threatened the corporate masters o... by Bob Soper on Sunday, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:09:30 AM
But people don't want expression of true feelings.... by BFalcon on Sunday, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:50:48 AM
To actually win, a third party has to siphon votes... by Scott Baker on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:43:25 PM
Well you're right Scott. But frankly and short of ... by Michael Shaw on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:08:48 PM
Given a first AND second choice, wouldn't most of ... by Bia Winter on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:35:49 PM
This might be the right time. But somehow I don't ... by Michael Shaw on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:41:18 PM
With an important addition: the system favors "win... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:44:05 PM
Conyers take a stand???? I don't think so!!!click ... by BARB BF on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:43:34 PM
And he never considered anything I said seriously ... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 3:46:37 PM
Yes, dammit, YES.... by B. Ross Ashley on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:55:14 PM
I am a liberal democrat largely turned libertarian... by truthseeker7 on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:01:30 PM
are the guys who got us into this economic mess an... by Michael Shaw on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:50:38 PM
Why does Ron Paul campaign for Michele Bachmann? H... by janet o'connell on Monday, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:18:31 PM
I agree with him about the FED, at least to a degr... by Michael Shaw on Wednesday, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:43:54 PM
After 40 years I departed, with about 15,000 Orego... by Joe Walsh on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:45:37 PM
I ended my subscription to the DCCC webpage and to... by Michael Shaw on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:53:22 PM
in their own party. Dennis Kucinich can tell you t... by Michael Shaw on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:32:48 PM
I dream come 2012 that there are 6 good candidates... by Michael Dewey on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:59:41 PM
It just adjourned a couple months ago. It is stil... by daveys on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:17:05 AM
Conditionally, I take exceptionally strong excepti... by Ed Tubbs on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:39:24 PM
Ask all the ignorants (neighbors, friends etc) whe... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:03:16 PM
The sentiment is utterly correct, we must form a n... by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:03:08 PM
are on the endangered species list for their upcom... by shirley reese on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:44:28 PM
Dave is a good old boy from my home state of Penns... by John Murphy on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:53:29 PM
Dave is a good old boy from my home state of Penns... by John Murphy on Friday, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:04:49 PM
I am still waiting for a currently serving Dem to ... by daveys on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:22:43 AM
Here's a big problem: Just a year ago, most progre... by Perry Logan on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:17:43 AM
Bill Clinton was my favorite and I still think tha... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:16:47 PM
Nader? Paul? McKinney? I voted for Kucinich in the... by Michael Shaw on Wednesday, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:56:11 PM
All your idols have one thing in common; thay also... by BFalcon on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:33:56 PM
I agree with the premise, but why a "new" third pa... by Stuart Bedasso on Saturday, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:45:26 PM
who will guarantee a new third party will not be a... by Michael Shaw on Wednesday, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:00:42 PM
Respectfully, for everyone's serious consideration... by Rob George on Sunday, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:57:39 PM
Dave's article makes good points, but if these "pr... by John Kirkland on Friday, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:47:37 PM