Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Inspiring 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Primary Headline on 3/6/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (55 comments)

Iran in the Crosshairs

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (84 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

By Gareth Porter and Ray McGovern


photo by Shahram Sharif
  

Last year, the Middle East dodged the danger of an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities and the inevitable spread of hostilities.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen was sent to tell the Israelis that the United States would not support such an attack, and after the fiasco in Georgia, the Russians too sent stern warnings to Tel Aviv.

But now the specter of an Israeli strike has reappeared. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s incoming prime minister, is far more committed to an attack on Iran than his predecessors.

Remember when Joe Biden told supporters of Barack Obama last October that Obama would be tested in his first six months in office?

There is good reason to believe he was referring to the likelihood that Netanyahu would become prime minister after the February 2009 Israeli election, and that he would waste little time finding a pretext to attack Iran. 

Netanyahu has been laying the groundwork for such an attack for years, constantly repeating that Tehran is “preparing another Holocaust” a la Germany in the Thirties.

He keeps hammering home the “existential” threat that would be posed to Israel (with its 200-300 nuclear weapons) if Iran had just one.

Netanyahu has made no bones about the fact that his preferred solution to the problem is a massive air attack on Iranian nuclear facilities and other military targets, and that he would not wait for any evidence that Iran had actually manufactured a weapon before doing so.

It would be, you see, a Bush-type "preventive" war. Netanyahu would fully expect Iranian retaliation of some kind and knee-jerk U.S. intervention on Israel's side. 

If such adventurism were to prevail, it would be a tragedy not only for Iran and the United States but for Israel as well. And it would bring to Israel more serious risk than at any time since its implantation in Palestine. 

It is also completely unnecessary. There has never been a shred of evidence that Iran has any intention of committing suicide by attacking Israel.

Nor is it clear that Iran has irrevocably decided to seek nuclear weapons.

The U.S. intelligence community determined unanimously in its most recent National Intelligence Estimate on Iran, completed in November 2007, that Iran had abandoned the nuclear weaponization part of its nuclear development program in 2003 and had not resumed such work. 

Largely forgotten is the fact that this estimate also concluded that Iran would extend the halt to its nuclear weapons program if the United States were to offer "credible" opportunities for Iran to achieve its "security, prestige and goals for regional influence." 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
55 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Some Clarifications are in Order by Jason Paz on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:56:58 AM
It's obvious to me........ by Ernest on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:39:43 AM
Jason, who is this "we"? by Mr M on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:51:06 AM
Mr. M, by Elizabeth Molchany on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:51:11 PM
Tell me Jason by Stanimal on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:28:23 AM
Let Us Hope That Israel Puts Threats Into Action by aberamsay on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:20:44 AM
Ramsheiy, are you insane? by Steven Leser on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:59:58 PM
You missed his point by eric dynamic on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28:40 PM
NO, No, no! by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:46:46 AM
Israel is a puppet by Mark Sashine on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:23:37 AM
Mark, these are excuses by Elizabeth Molchany on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:30:31 PM
Who pulls the strings by eric dynamic on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:02:34 PM
I dont agree... by Steven Leser on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:03:17 PM
No by shadow dancer on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:39:05 AM
I guess that picture insert failed. Here... by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:50:16 AM
There Is No International Arbitrator by aberamsay on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:57:23 AM
Wake up, Ramey. by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:43:38 AM
This is not to reply, just to correct myself above by Mark Sashine on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:06:23 AM
Exactly, now you see. There are utter maniacs in charge by Steven Leser on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:05:26 PM
Geez by Donna Malone on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:53:32 PM
Donna by Elizabeth Molchany on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:00:27 PM
preventive versus preemptive war by Cheryl Biren on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:12:32 PM
Cheryl - on prevention and pre-emptive by Elizabeth Molchany on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:41:28 PM
semantics by Cheryl Biren on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:56:45 PM
Cheryl, I'm terribly sorry by Elizabeth Molchany on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:34:29 PM
I understand Elizabeth's point and I concur... by jersey girl on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:44:15 PM
Let's SEE some SOLID PROOF before we hear more PROPAGANDA by eric dynamic on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:13:05 PM
AIPAC by eric dynamic on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:40:38 PM
Instant Amnesia by eric dynamic on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:51:29 PM
Eric, I love your by Elizabeth Molchany on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:43:49 PM
Eric is spot on by jersey girl on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:38:32 PM
Watch them seed the media by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:22:49 AM
P.S.: Try some Basic Common Sense by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:53:59 AM
The Sublime Solution by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:51:20 AM
Sad fact by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:10:56 AM
Anyone want to acknowledge and address by GLloyd Rowsey on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:39:13 PM
I agree and I apologize for not acnkowledging this... by Steven Leser on Friday, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:10:53 PM
Give us the synopsis by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:40:41 AM
I don't see why you need my words, Eric. by GLloyd Rowsey on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:59:31 AM
sorry gloyd by jersey girl on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:27:11 PM
sorry gloyd by jersey girl on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:36:31 PM
wait and see by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:30:51 PM
I hear you both, Eric and Jersey Girl. by GLloyd Rowsey on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:47:05 PM
Yeah, what to do by eric dynamic on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:41:29 AM
One thing we can do by eric dynamic on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:15:36 AM
Excellent by eric dynamic by aberamsay on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:40:53 AM
Can you clear this up for me then? by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:43:05 PM
One other thing by eric dynamic on Saturday, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:13:34 PM
Eric, you know the NNPT? by GLloyd Rowsey on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:08:03 PM
I believe them more than I believe half-cocked logic by eric dynamic on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50:35 AM
followup by eric dynamic on Monday, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:17:19 AM
It Was A Fatwa In The Name Of Islam by aberamsay on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:14:44 AM
Alright by eric dynamic on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:31:11 PM
AIPAC in office (the meaning of Rahm) by eric dynamic on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:46:43 PM
A great summary paragraph. by GLloyd Rowsey on Sunday, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:29:52 PM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum