Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

Inconsistencies In Reporting Japan's Nuclear Crisis

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com


I can't shake the feeling that the Nuclear Industry is controlling much of what we hear about the crisis in Japan. General Electric is one of the "biggies" in the Nuclear Power Industry and they also own a lot of Network Television resources. In the same way, the so called "Professors" and "Experts" being interviewed by CNN et.al., are sometimes right on and at other times so far off the mark that they are either incompetent or outright lying.

The reports we are allowed to hear say the radiation levels are very low and of no danger. I even heard one "Professor" on CNN say that someone having a CAT/PET receives 100 times the amount the Japanese people are being exposed to. Ouch! I just had a routine 6 month CAT/PET this morning as a follow up for Lymphoma I had a year ago. As I write this, the radiation (Gamma) just over my kidneys measures 260 mr/hr. That's a lot but let me prove the radiation in Japan is orders of magnitude greater.

The Los Angeles Times reports three workers are sick from radiation exposure. To become sick from radiation normally requires at least 250 rem exposure and more likely 350 or above. My radiation is .260 rem, compared to a minimum of 250 rem to get radiation sickness.

It is also being reported that a US Navy Carrier went through the "plume" at sea and the sailors received one months permissible dose in 10 minutes. In addition, a helicopter taking pictures had to be decontaminated. These statements are not to be taken lightly.

I realize I am using old terminology when I speak of rems and today's terminology is Sieverts (Sv) and Grey's (Gy). But I was trained in Nuclear Physics at US Government expense back in the early 1960's and I still use the terminology I am most comfortable with. For conversion, 1 Sievert equals 100 rem. Sieverts are usually referred to in micro-sieverts or 1 millionth of a Sievert.

Let's push for actual numbers on the radiation levels! Tell us what is being measured rather than weasel wording saying it is "acceptable", "within limits", etc. IF one or more reactors goes into a full meltdown (and they already admit "partial"meltdown) , there may be repercussions as far away as Hawaii or even the coast of America. So what preparations are the Government Officials taking? I heard another weasel word explanation saying they were "making necessary plans."

 

I am a 70 year young, retired Engineer. In my career, I managed budgets over $300 Million per year. I have completed numerous economics and probability classes in addition to my Engineering discipline. I was trained as a Nuclear Weapons (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Lying or incompetent? You decide. by Ron Freeman on Tuesday, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:19:51 AM