Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Inconsistencies In Reporting Japan's Nuclear Crisis

By       Message Ron Freeman     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/15/11


I can't shake the feeling that the Nuclear Industry is controlling much of what we hear about the crisis in Japan. General Electric is one of the "biggies" in the Nuclear Power Industry and they also own a lot of Network Television resources. In the same way, the so called "Professors" and "Experts" being interviewed by CNN et.al., are sometimes right on and at other times so far off the mark that they are either incompetent or outright lying.


The reports we are allowed to hear say the radiation levels are very low and of no danger. I even heard one "Professor" on CNN say that someone having a CAT/PET receives 100 times the amount the Japanese people are being exposed to. Ouch! I just had a routine 6 month CAT/PET this morning as a follow up for Lymphoma I had a year ago. As I write this, the radiation (Gamma) just over my kidneys measures 260 mr/hr. That's a lot but let me prove the radiation in Japan is orders of magnitude greater.


The Los Angeles Times reports three workers are sick from radiation exposure. To become sick from radiation normally requires at least 250 rem exposure and more likely 350 or above. My radiation is .260 rem, compared to a minimum of 250 rem to get radiation sickness.


It is also being reported that a US Navy Carrier went through the "plume" at sea and the sailors received one months permissible dose in 10 minutes. In addition, a helicopter taking pictures had to be decontaminated. These statements are not to be taken lightly.


I realize I am using old terminology when I speak of rems and today's terminology is Sieverts (Sv) and Grey's (Gy). But I was trained in Nuclear Physics at US Government expense back in the early 1960's and I still use the terminology I am most comfortable with. For conversion, 1 Sievert equals 100 rem. Sieverts are usually referred to in micro-sieverts or 1 millionth of a Sievert.


Let's push for actual numbers on the radiation levels! Tell us what is being measured rather than weasel wording saying it is "acceptable", "within limits", etc. IF one or more reactors goes into a full meltdown (and they already admit "partial"meltdown) , there may be repercussions as far away as Hawaii or even the coast of America. So what preparations are the Government Officials taking? I heard another weasel word explanation saying they were "making necessary plans."

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Retired Electrical Engineer.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Second Nebraska Nuke Plant Declares "Unusual Event"

Nuclear Station Berm Collapses

More Problems at the Ft. Calhoun Nuclear Power Plant

The Irony of "Red State" Socialism

Inconsistencies In Reporting Japan's Nuclear Crisis