Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
7 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Hand Counted Paper Ballots? Yes, faster than ever, please!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Dear readers and friends:

I am responding to an article written by the Christian Science Monitor, titled "Return to Hand-Counted Paper Ballots? Not so Fast" posted here to Opednews. http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/link.php?id=62588

Previously, I served on an election reform think tank alongside election reform expert Victoria Collier, whose work has been praised by Bev Harris, in a statement from Bev's own mouth saying that "it takes my breath away." You can read Bev Harris’s interview with Victoria here and Bev’s high praise along with it:

http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/9954/10127.html

Alongside three computer programmers who served on the forum with Victoria Collier, one of whom is also a Democratic election official, I learned the following facts about computerized elections and hand counted paper ballots, each alike:

A) ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT HAND-COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS



They take too long to count. Too many mistakes.
TRUE FACT: Canada hand-counts its paper ballots in four hours, says Victoria Collier, and with very few mistakes.

B) ABOUT COMPUTERIZED PAPER PRINT-OUTS

This is one of the most misleading matters leading to the public’s false sense of security. Consider:

All three computer programmers on the Forum, plus more programmers' opinions that I read on Moveon.org's forum (since closed), agreed unanimously that it is "easy" to simply misalign the computer's mechanism with the pushbuttons on the screen.

Thus, if one pushed the button for OBama, the paper trail would accurately reflect the OBama vote. However, secretly inside the black box of the computer----from which the vote is counted-----the vote would secretly be cast for McCain. Computers can "easily" be programmed to do this...ten percent of the time, five percent, two percent....as one wishes.

Recounts of the paper trail? Forget about it. It will never happen. The reason is simple: It costs too much. Depending on the size of the precinct, each area may charge anywhere upward of $5,000 per precinct, graduating up to $20,000 apiece or much more. Multiply that by the number of precincts, county-wide and nation-wide, and you get the picture.

Thus, it becomes apparent that it is not recounts, but accurate and transparent votes to begin with, which we should be relying on for a fair election.

The false sense of security on the part of the public, in holding a piece of paper in their hand which accurately shows their vote, is the very thing which could help to steal the election. Because when the public sees that their vote was “accurately” cast---at least according to the so-called paper “Trail”---then there would be little or no questioning the falsification of the vote which actually did, would and usually does occur, inside the computer’s black box. Based on that false sense of security, people would not be inclined to step forward, believing all was fair and square, based on the paper “Record” of their “Vote”. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth!

C) Isn't it just slightly suspicious that it is computer programmers, who are paid, and not transparent paper systems, that we are relying on for counting our votes? Check out Bev Harris's website www.blackboxvoting.org    (not .com, which is a different entity): You can see video footage of her wrestling on the floor with computer programmers, who had garbaged shredded computer print-outs, every one of which was election print-out material.

In actual fact, I can tell you of people I know who have said they personally have watched the figures on the computer jump---for the wrong vote.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Please pass the election reform proposal in this article to letters to the editor

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism: "Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips

Why Reducing, Reusing and Recycling Really *Does* Help the Environment

How Misguided Spirituality is Informing the Religious Right + Fascist Politics

Leaked "reports" about secret Congressional meeting may be a hoax

Army sources say troops to be deployed to USA for election "terrorist" curbing

FBI/police ordered to curtail protests: Explains Amy Goodman's arrest?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
To be clear-  The election reform community i... by Brent Turner on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:23:39 PM
Hello BrettThank you for your commonsense approach... by Kathryn Smith on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:53:30 PM
Kathryn :  Though I inderstand your fears reg... by Brent Turner on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:29:21 PM
I suppose that Open Source paper vote counting (no... by Keith Mothersson on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:14:46 PM
Alas, I don't know at this point how to get a ... by Kathryn Smith on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:07:21 PM
America has bought a crock.Hand counted ballots ar... by John Haigh on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:09:30 PM
That doesn't change the fact we use computers-... by Brent Turner on Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:30:43 PM