Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
12 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Corporations Don't Need a Tax Cut, So Why Is Obama Proposing One?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Well Said 3   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 2/22/12
Become a Fan
  (105 fans)

opednews.com


The Obama administration is proposing to lower corporate taxes from the current 35 percent to 28 percent for most companies and to 25 percent for manufacturers.

The move is supposed to be "revenue neutral" -- meaning the Administration is also proposing to close assorted corporate tax loopholes to offset the lost revenues. One such loophole allows corporations to park their earnings overseas where taxes are lower.

Why isn't the White House just proposing to close the loopholes without reducing overall corporate tax rates? That would generate more tax revenue that could be used for, say, public schools.

It's not as if corporations are hurting. Quite the contrary. American companies are booking higher profits than ever. They're sitting on $2 trillion of cash they don't know what to do with.

And it's not as if corporate taxes are high. In fact, corporate tax receipts as a share of profits is now at its lowest level in at least 40 years. According to the Congressional Budget Office, corporate federal taxes paid last year dropped to 12.1 percent of profits earned from activities within the United States. That's a gigantic drop from the 25.6 percent, on average, that corporations paid from 1987 to 2008.

And it's not that corporations are paying an inordinate share of federal tax revenues. Here again, the reality is just the opposite. Corporate taxes have plummeted as a share of total federal revenues. In 1953, under President Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican, corporate taxes accounted for 32 percent of total federal tax revenues. Now they're only 10 percent.

But now the federal budget deficit is ballooning, and in less than a year, major cuts are scheduled to slice everything from prenatal care to Medicare. So this would seem to be the ideal time to raise corporate taxes -- or at the very least close corporate tax loopholes without lowering corporate rates.

The average American is not exactly enamored with American corporations. Polls show most of the public doesn't trust them. (A recent national poll by the University of Massachusetts at Lowell found 71 percent with an unfavorable impression of big business -- about the same as those expressing an unfavorable view of Washington.)

The Administration's initiative doesn't even make sense as a bargaining maneuver.

Republicans will just accept the Administration's lower corporate tax rate without closing any tax loopholes. House Republicans have already made it clear that, to them, closing a tax loophole is tantamount to raising taxes. And corporate lobbyists in Washington know better than anyone how to hold tight to loopholes they've already got.

Big business will fight to keep their foreign tax shelters. After all, it's almost impossible to distinguish between their foreign and domestic earnings, which is why the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business lobbies have spent the past three years trying to make it even easier for companies to defer U.S. taxes on income they supposedly earn outside the country.

Representative David Camp, a Michigan Republican who heads the House Ways and Means Committee, has already proposed a 25 percent corporate top rate and changes that would let companies avoid paying U.S. taxes on even more of the income they say they earn outside America.

Nothing is going to be enacted this year, anyway, so it would have made more sense for the Administration to support a hike in corporate taxes -- and use it to highlight the difference between the President and his likely Republican challenger.

Mitt Romney wants to reduce the corporate tax rate to 25 percent before eliminating any tax loopholes. Rick Santorum wants to cut the rate to 17.5 percent and eliminate corporate taxes for manufacturers. Newt Gingrich wants to cut the rate to 12.5 percent and let companies write off all capital investments immediately.

It's discouraging. The President gives a rousing speech, as he did on December 6 in Kansas. Then he misses an opportunity to put his campaign where his mouth is.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://robertreich.org/

Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor and Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, has a new film, "Inequality for All," to be released September 27. He blogs at www.robertreich.org.
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Republican's Big Lies About Jobs (And Why Obama Must Repudiate Them)

Paul Ryan Still Doesn't Get It

What Mitt Romney Really Represents

The Minimum Wage, Guns, Healthcare, and the Meaning of a Decent Society

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again

The Gas Wars

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Because he's the fraud we've all come to expect.He... by 911TRUTH on Wednesday, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:54:07 PM
when the democrats have just proved themselves the... by zon moy on Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:02:55 AM
This b*llsh*t about tax cuts is getting old. ... by Dennis Kaiser on Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:26:02 AM
Why is Obama proposing a Corporate Tax cut?  ... by Susan Rapp on Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:20:09 PM
Because the answer seems obvious to me: he's pande... by PCM on Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:58:52 PM
You are correct PCM. It is a rhetorical question, ... by David Ruhlen on Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:04:29 PM
Corporations do not pay income tax.  They (so... by Richard Pietrasz on Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:19:51 PM
Why not lower the tax rate to 25% with a 20% minim... by Mark Ropel on Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:23:36 PM
Per FairTax.org:"Corporations pass on their tax bu... by Don Hall on Friday, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:05:49 PM
Great question. WE all know that the loopholes tha... by Leslie Piper on Friday, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:12:45 PM
Prof. you wrote, "Why isn't the White House just p... by Robert Bostick on Saturday, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:53:13 AM
Mr. Obama, by now, has proven to u... by Herbert Calhoun on Saturday, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:19:22 PM