Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   22 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Coakley Headed to Defeat in Massachusetts Unless Democratic Base Turns Out

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/18/10

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)



Martha Coakley at her rally with former President Clinton

President Obama and former President Clinton have both visited the bay state in the last 48 hours to galvanize support for a seemingly hapless Martha Coakley who has found herself in a tight race for what should have been an easy election victory.

Statewide elections in Massachusetts tend to favor Democratic candidates. That we have a close race in this election with some polls of likely voters showing the Republican a few points ahead is the result of a number of factors:

1. Elections like off year elections and special elections in months other than November usually have a depressed turn out that favors the candidate whose supporters are more energized.

2. The Republican base is unusually energized as a result of all of the lies they have been fed about health care reform.

3. The Democratic base seems disinterested or demoralized.

4. The Democratic candidate has not run a strong campaign. Coakley's team seems to have thought the demographics in Massachusetts would be enough to assure her the win. Coakley did not perform well in the debates and has made a number of gaffes during the campaign.

5. Senior members of the Democratic Party were slow to recognize the danger. The White House, the DNC and the Massachusetts Democratic Party didn't realize this was a real race until polls showed the race within the margin of error.

This race will be won or lost on turnout, specifically that of Democrats. If Massachusetts Democrats come out and vote on Tuesday, January 19, Brown and the Republicans don't have a chance. Most experts are banking on the idea that this will not happen.

Implications for Health Care Reform

Some interesting scenarios come into play if Coakley loses the race. At first glance, it would seem that this would deal a death blow to reform efforts as this would mean Democrats would only have potentially 59 votes in the senate and could not overcome a filibuster if all Republicans would unite behind one. However, we would still see a passage of Health Care Reform if Coakley loses.

First, it could take up to two weeks to certify the results and seat Brown. That is more than enough time for Democrats to unite behind a compromise bill, have it scored by the CBO and rush it through congress for a vote with Coakley still representing Massachusetts. For Democrats, that is the best case scenario if Coakley loses. The problem with this scenario is it has two dependencies that could fail, the speed of the certification, and the ability of Democrats to speedily produce and vote on a final bill.

If the above could not be done in time, the Democrats could still get a bill passed if House Democrats agreed to the entire Senate bill. The senate has already voted on this bill and I don't believe it would be required for them to vote on it again. This would be an ugly scenario. There are many issues with the Senate version of the Health Care Reform bill and many Democrats, myself included, have hopes that those issues can be rectified in a final bill.

It is beyond the Health Care Reform bill where we see the maximum effect of a potential Coakley loss in Mssachusetts. A Republican victory would probably derail most of the rest of the Obama agenda. Republican senators have exhibited disciplined solidarity in their opposition to President Obama and the Democrats thus far in Obama's term. There could very well be no progress on immigration reform, Gay rights and a host of other issues. Items of spending and other budgetary measures could still be passed through reconciliation.

The loss could be the beginning of a long Democratic slide that culminates in a loss of the congress in November and perhaps even a loss of the White House in 2012.

If Coakley loses, regardless of circumstances the single thought permeating American politics will be, if Democrats cannot win in Massachusetts, where can they win?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/blog/steven-leser_103/bio/

A political blogger for the International Business Times, Steve Leser is a hot national political pundit. He has appeared on MSNBC's Coundown with Keith Olbermann, Comedy Central's Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Russia Today's (RT) Crosstalk with (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

McCain Campaign Violated McCain-Feingold law with Palin Clothing Purchases

McCain attacked 18 year old Chelsea Clinton in 1998 now says Palin's family & kids are off limits

McCain says "Horseshit" on National TV During Debate

North Korea – Impending Missile Launch May Require US Military Action

Palin: Drill Baby Drill, but blame Obama for the Spill!

Palin to McCain - Oops I did it Again

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I take exception to any official involved in law e... by Steven G. Erickson on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:47:57 AM
That a Republican could even come this close to ta... by Starbuck on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:01:25 PM
I articulate the five reasons the race is the way ... by Steven Leser on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:53:38 PM
I suppose that could be true, but you have to ackn... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:53:52 PM
Excuse me but David Axelrod has described the Demo... by Miriam Callaghan on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:21:10 PM
You assume that MASS democrats even if they all tu... by Hoss Hoss on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:31:08 PM
As many around him have said, Ted was a pragmatist... by Steven Leser on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:07:08 PM
won't pass the Senate bill as is.This Health Insur... by Hoss Hoss on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:52:56 PM
senate bill as is if that is to what it comes down... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:09:12 PM
If Coakley loses, it will be because her election ... by John Jonik on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:56:03 PM
You are willing to kill 40,000 people a year to sa... by Steven Leser on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:36:03 PM
Originally, the number of people who are estimated... by Blaine Kinsey on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:25:57 PM
Sorry, but its true. You've got to choose which is... by Steven Leser on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:30:05 PM
is because it has finally dawned on me, after voti... by Nick van Nes on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:54:59 PM
More specifically, anything wrong with Coakley? OK... by Steven Leser on Monday, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:32:01 PM
You can take this with or without a violin,There's... by Nick van Nes on Thursday, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:17:00 PM
Check this out: Lawrence O'Donnell says the Republ... by Perry Logan on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:49:41 AM
Are you kidding? Republicans do NOT want to pass t... by Tim Harney on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:51:54 AM
I agree completely that *IF* Coakley loses in Mass... by Tim Harney on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:49:36 AM
By all means, ignore the facts in the situation an... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:06:51 PM
The deal struck with the unions was announced in t... by Starbuck on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:57:57 PM
ignore the fact that the democrat voters are simpl... by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:09:46 PM