Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 4   News 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/27/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

CHENEY WAS RIGHT ABOUT ONE THING: DEFICITS DON'T MATTER

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (98 fans)   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

"Deficit terrorists" are gutting governments and forcing the privatization of public assets, all in the name of "deficit reduction."   But deficits aren't actually a bad thing.   In today's monetary scheme, in which most money comes from debt, debt and deficits are actually necessary to have a stable money supply.   The public debt is the people's money.

Former Vice President Dick Cheney famously said, "Deficits don't matter."   A staunch Republican, he was arguing against raising taxes on the rich; but today Republicans seem to have forgotten this maxim.   They are bent on stripping social programs, privatizing public assets, and gutting unions, all in the name of "deficit reduction."  

Worse, Standard & Poor's has now taken up the hatchet.   Some bloggers are calling it blackmail.   This private, for-profit rating agency, with a dubious track record of its own, is dictating government policy, threatening to downgrade the government's long-held triple AAA credit rating if Congress fails to deal with its deficit in sufficiently draconian fashion.   The threat is a real one, as we've seen with the devastating effects of downgrades in Greece, Ireland and other struggling countries.   Lowered credit ratings force up interest rates and cripple national budgets.  

The biggest threat to the dollar's credit rating, however, may be the game of chicken being played with the federal debt ceiling.   Nearly 70 percent of Americans are said to be in favor of a freeze on May 16, when the ceiling is due to be raised; and Tea Party-oriented politicians could go along with this scheme to please their constituents.

If they get what they wish for, the party could be over for the whole economy.   The Chinese are dumping U.S. Treasuries, and the Fed is backing off from its "quantitative easing" program, in which it has been buying federal securities with money simply created on its books.   When the Fed buys Treasuries, the government gets the money nearly interest-free, since the Fed rebates its profits to the government after deducting its costs.   When the Chinese and the Fed quit buying Treasuries, interest rates are liable to shoot up; and with a frozen debt ceiling, the government would have to default, since any interest increase on a $14 trillion debt would be a major expenditure.   Today the Treasury is paying a very low .25% on securities of 9 months or less, and interest on the whole debt is about 3% (a total of $414 billion on a debt of $14 trillion in 2010).   Greece is paying 4.5% on its debt, and Venezuela is paying 18% -- six times the 3% we're paying on ours.   Interest at 18% would add $2 trillion to our tax bill.   That would mean paying three times what we're paying now in personal income taxes (projected to be a total of $956 billion in 2011), just to cover the interest.  

There are other alternatives.   Congress could cut the military budget -- but it probably won't, since this option is never even discussed.   It could raise taxes on the rich, but that probably won't happen either.   A third option is to slash government services.   But which services?   How about social security?   Do you really want to see Grandma panhandling?   Congress can't agree on a budget for good reason: there is no good place to cut.  

Fortunately, there is a more satisfactory solution.   We can sit back, relax, and concede that Cheney was right.   Deficits aren't necessarily a bad thing!   They don't matter, so long as they are at very low interest rates; and they can be kept at these very low rates either by maintaining our triple A credit rating or by borrowing from the Fed essentially interest-free.  

The Yin and Yang of Money

Under our current monetary scheme, debt and deficits not only don't matter but are actually necessary in order to maintain a stable money supply.  The reason wa s explained by Marriner Eccles, Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, in hearings before the House Committee on Banking and Currency in 1941.   Wright Patman asked Eccles how the Federal Reserve got the money to buy government bonds. 

"We created it," Eccles replied.

 "Out of what?"                                                                

 "Out of the right to issue credit money."

"And there is nothing behind it, is the ­re, except our government's credit?"

"That is what our money system is," Eccles replied.  "If there were no debts in our money system, there wouldn't be any money."

That could explain why the U.S. debt hasn't been paid off since 1835.   It has just continued to grow, and the economy has grown and flourished along with it.   A debt that is never paid off isn't really a debt.   Financial planner Mark Pash calls it a National Monetization Account .   Government bonds (or debt) are "monetized" (or turned into money).   Government bonds and dollar bills are the yin and yang of the money supply, the negative and positive sides of the national balance sheet.   To have a plus-1 on one side of the balance sheet, a minus-1 needs to be created on the other.


DEBT TO GDP by WIKIPEDIA

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the Public Banking Institute, and author of 11 books. Her websites are http://WebofDebt.com, http://EllenBrown.com, and http://PublicBankingInstitute.org. In her latest book, "Web of Debt: The Shocking (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Tweet: CHENEY WAS RIGHT ABOUT ONE THING: DEFICITS DON'T MATTER: http://bit.ly/hhveze by Ellen Brown on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:04:50 AM
So which is it? by Joe Vignolo on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:06:44 AM
Fed and interest by Ellen Brown on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:11:44 PM
Under our current system, debt is the money supply by R A Bows on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:08:11 PM
But deficits do matter. by wraft on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:12:59 PM
Ellen's agenda by Kuzminski on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:22:23 PM
government CAN do it better by Ernie Messerschmidt on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:20:38 PM
what's the REAL REASON for austerity then? by Ernie Messerschmidt on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:48:26 PM
real reason for austerity by Ellen Brown on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:14:22 PM
Voters by Hoss Hoss on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:49:42 PM
one of those offers you can't refuse by Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall on Thursday, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:54:12 AM
skimming by Ellen Brown on Thursday, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:01:25 AM
Excellent Article -- by Deacon Solomon on Thursday, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:31:01 AM
Ellen Brown's national debt/deficit analysis by Dietz Ziechmann on Thursday, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:27:42 PM