Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
6 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

CANDIDATE PLEDGES: RESTORING REAL DEMOCRACY TO NATIONAL ELECTIONS or NAILING THE S.O.B.s ONE-AT-A-TIME

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 4/29/12

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

opednews.com

Grover Norquist's no-new-taxes pledge (the "Norquist Pledge") that he demanded of conservative legislators has become a weapon of mass destruction. The American economy now suffers from the burden of unsustainable cumulative debt and the shredding of the social contract  because the fiscal terrorists of the right refuse to require the rich to pay their fair share of the cost of sustaining a viable, compassionate, humane society. 

In addition to the imposed fiscal conservatism of the Norquist blackmail, there is a second pledge, the "silent pledge," allowing big money to trump voter preferences in determining national policy. We see this in the deluge of dollars flowing into Washington via lobbyists, campaign contributions, PACs and SuperPACS that have drowned out the legitimate voice of the common citizen.

I suggest that we can the Norquist Pledge and the "silent pledge" to an opposite effect; that is, as a means of restoring sanity in the legislative branch of government. This coming election provides the necessary and pivotal opportunity to confront our representatives and deliver an ultimatum, an ultimatum in the form of a new kind of pledge, one that hasn't been seen is a while -- a pledge to do the right thing. Or else!

The Idea

We put it in writing. It takes the form of a candidate pledge to decisively and unambiguously undertake certain initiatives in Congress on a particular issue. There are specific directions to implement a policy supported by a large majority of American voters. We force candidates to sign the pledge. If they do, we're in. We get the legislation we want. If they refuse, we humiliate them, harass them, jeopardize their support, attempt to defeat them. We brook no compromise. We accept no excuses. We leave no room for equivocation. 

For this to work, the pledges must cover those issues where the voting public by vast majorities have indicated precisely what they want done: Social Security, taxes on the rich, the war in Afghanistan, oil industry subsidies, Medicare. Frankly, it is appalling how many important issues the public has in credible polls indicated unambiguously where they stand only to have our politicians defy them.  

Every candidate should be required to sign the pledges. This would put the control of voting on these critical items directly back in the hands of voters.

Realistically this is impossible. There simply is not enough time. So for now, it is more important to target incumbents, specifically those incumbents who have voted against enormously popular measures. Conveniently, via their voting records, they have handed us the ammunition we need to force their hands. These are the arrogant scoundrels who have brazenly sold the American public and their constituents down the river. They have bowed to their rich campaign donors and blown off the rest of us as irrelevant. 

These are the ones we go after. They are the ones we need to either turn around or send packing.  

Let me point out that this kind of precise targeting is exactly the way the right wing goes about decimating the ranks of progressives. It obviously works. Time to turn the tables. 

Step 1:   Petitions

The process starts with petitions, i. e. canvassing within a particular voting district, or state if the incumbent at issue is a senator, for hard evidence of the level of public support for the initiatives we want to see passed.

Here is a sample petition, the suggested format for canvassing on any issue: 

I am a registered voter and will only vote for a candidate for public office who will leave social security alone. If a candidate guarantees unequivocally to fight for keeping social security as it currently stands, I will give that candidate my unqualified support. 

Obviously, the petition is more of a statement of support for a specific policy position than an actual petition for some action. But it accomplishes precisely what's needed here. 

In fact, the petitions are the linchpin for the assault on these scoundrels. They provide the leverage needed to get the attention of candidates and make them an offer they can't refuse. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://jdrachel.com

John Rachel has a B. A. in Philosophy, has traveled extensively, is a songwriter and music producer, a left-of-left liberal, and has spent his life trying to resolve the intrinsic clash between the metaphysical purity of Buddhism and the (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Going Postal

CANDIDATE PLEDGES: RESTORING REAL DEMOCRACY TO NATIONAL ELECTIONS or NAILING THE S.O.B.s ONE-AT-A-TIME

"Throw the bums out!"

Candidate Pledges: A Strategy For Jettisoning The Scoundrels and Restoring Representative Democracy

"The Right To Bear Nuclear Arms"

Real News

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Great article! The author suggests that we create ... by Maureen Gill on Sunday, Apr 29, 2012 at 9:09:30 PM
only a bit more tameHere is the websiteI hope peop... by Virginia Simson on Monday, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:45:20 AM
Folks can take this to their State's Attorney Gene... by Virginia Simson on Monday, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:34:13 PM
The editor at OpEdNews thinks we "have a great ide... by John Rachel on Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 4:11:24 AM
The editor at OpEdNews thinks we "have a great ide... by John Rachel on Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 4:12:43 AM
Great article, John. As I am sure you are aware, w... by Rick Staggenborg, MD on Friday, May 4, 2012 at 1:04:47 PM