Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H4) on 1/20/12:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (6 comments)

Book whitewashes Guantanamo military tribunals

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

(This is a copy of a letter to the editor of the New York Times Book Review)

     Jack Goldsmith's review of William Shawcross's book, Justice and the Enemy (New York Times Book Review, January 22, 2012), is appalling in its inaccuracy and lack of respect for justice. As Shawcross admits, the Nuremberg tribunals were ad hoc, and therefore illegal, military tribunals that applied ex post facto, and therefore inapplicable, laws to try Nazis for acts that had not been illegal when they were committed. The atrocities of some of these people were unspeakable, but if I recall correctly, others were found innocent and released. The similarity with Guantanamo pretty much ends there.

     It has to be recognized that military commission trials are inseparable from the detainments. The categorization of the detainees as "illegal combatants" is an illegtal maneuver intended to avoid the legalities of civilian criminal proceedings or prisoner of war status. Many of the Guantanamo detainees (often innocent, including children) were held without charges or trials for years, without adequate legal representation, and a large percentage were held under inhumane conditions and tortured. The Guantanamo detentions were (and are) serious breaches of international and US laws -- not, as Shawcross and Goldsmith maintain, reasonable decisions made by an administration acting in good faith. The lies, the torture, the unconscionable continued retention of prisoners after they had been cleared, are yet another stain on our imperial history that will never be eradicated. 

     Goldsmith even goes so far as to refer to the Guantanamo detainees as "the perpetrators of 9/11," which is a lie. The suggestion that the military commissions "of the Bush era were more solicitous of defendants' right than the Nuremberg proceedings" is unlikely if we treat the detentions and the tribunals as part and parcel of the same thing. To suggest that Obama has conferred upon the military tribunals a legitimacy that his predecessor never could is egregious considering Obama and his predecessors should be facing trial for war crimes in the legitimate international courts.

     Goldsmith, and apparently Shawcross, are participating in the perpetuation of an evil myth. Instead of speaking truth to the face of power they are defending the abuse of power. Now, with the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act, American citizens, even on American soil, face the same renditions, indefinite detention without trial, and torture suffered by foreign innocents caught up in the sham "war on terror." No one, anywhere, will be safe except the cronies of the plutocracy.

Paul Brown

Morgantown, WV 

 

I was born and lived in a number of countries in Latin America and in Spain, as well as the US. I was educated at MIT (BS Life Sciences), University of Chicago (PhD Physiology), and Cornell (postdoctoral). I am presently professor emeritus of (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Of Course by Richard Pietrasz on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:12:38 PM
Forget military trials, by Archie on Friday, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:38:16 PM
Mostly agree by Richard Pietrasz on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:44:35 PM
I always thought by Archie on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:14:44 PM
That's what the judge tells you by Richard Pietrasz on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:55:40 PM
I certainly by Archie on Saturday, Jan 21, 2012 at 4:27:53 PM