Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

"What It Is Like to Go to War", by Karl Marlantes--My Response

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 5 of 6 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
- Advertisement -

I am not on board with some of the other things you have stated earlier in the book either, and this makes my discomfort more intense as I read this part of the book.


If it is true, as you claim, that humans have an innate savage nature that comes out when violence is demanded by leaders of nations, and that in truth all humans are endowed with the inner savage and get pleasure out of extreme violence that wreaks havoc and chaos and kills wantonly, and later, after returning to normal society, they say in reflection, "I loved it" and "I wish I could be there" when a new war is started",   then is it not likely that those who elect to make a career out of the military do it in hopes of more such opportunities? This is a frightening thought.


My experience suggests that you are wrong about this savage personality lurking inside of all human beings.   I think that military training is intended to short circuit the normal superego's messages and produce a wanton thrill killer mentality because that is the most expedient way to "git "er'done".   And to hell with the rampant PTSD that ensues when the warrior goes home.


Your thesis focuses on trying to eliminate the PTSD without addressing the criminality of elected leaders who have no moral scruples and are permitted to commit us to endless wars of no moral purpose.


- Advertisement -

I think that you are right about what happens to contract warriors when the contract has been fulfilled and they return to civilian society. Many, maybe most, do return with PTSD. And when the war is perceived by society as an unjust war the returning warrior does not encounter a grateful nation.   Under the assumption that the President, an elected official, by definition can do no wrong it would be right to expect the nation always to be grateful to returning warriors.   But this assumption is wrong as history has proven.


It would be unfair to condemn the returning warriors for the atrocities they committed in the war, because they believed the cleverly concealed fact that the President may be wrong when they signed their military enlistment contract.   They were naïve and perceived their enlistment to be a noble sacrifice that, although it might get them killed, was proof of their patriotism.   That was the result of a wrong and cruelly fraudulent public policy based on "Father knows best."


This flaw in the design of our constitution needs to be corrected. The only justification for war is an obvious threat to our families, homes, and our sovereignty.   The present system does not prevent war for other reasons that usually are the result of sociopathic motives on the part of decision makers.

- Advertisement -


While I don't disagree that your proposed program would assist returning warriors with their otherwise intractable cognitive dissonance, it preserves the systemic flaw that caused this trauma.


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

I am a retired physicist and hold a B.S. in Ch. E. as well. I have been an environmental activist since the early 1970s. I have been a writer of opinion pieces and other essays since about 1995 and am a published author of history. I have (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"Small is Beautiful-Economics as if People Mattered"

The looming crisis of the death of Windows XP

Currency in Fiat Monetary Systems in General and the US Federal Reserve System in Particular

The Trouble With Cash--a World Awash in $100 Federal Reserve Notes

We have been transformed into a pathocracy--Political Ponerology, a must read

Dear PayPal


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

...Go to War (Subject line not long enough)I wante... by Jerry Lobdill on Sunday, Dec 25, 2011 at 11:07:59 AM
Obviously, Lobdill has seemingly never been in uni... by Michael Kavanaugh on Monday, Dec 26, 2011 at 1:41:47 AM
Are you the Michael Kavanaugh I found online who w... by Stuart Steinberg on Monday, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:08:31 PM
Dear Mr. Steinberg,I resent your arrogant comment.... by Jerry Lobdill on Tuesday, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:54:38 AM