Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

"What It Is Like to Go to War", by Karl Marlantes--My Response

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jerry Lobdill     Permalink
      (Page 4 of 6 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 4979
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

~~~~

He, however, doesn't do the killing. Some pilot has to pickle the load on some human being, and if that human being's government never intended to strike the United States, then the pilot kills an innocent person.  

~~~~ 

Damned straight!

~~~~ 

A warrior cannot commit to combat tentatively.  

~~~~ 

The warrior does not make these decisions.  

- Advertisement -

~~~~ 

Flawed as our response to Pearl Harbor was by racism and ignorance, it was not flawed by doubt about Japan's intentions. Our guys went to war with everything they had. Imagine the Roosevelt administration telling Patton he couldn't pursue the German Army south of the Loire for fear of upsetting the Vichy government.

~~~~ 

This is irrelevant to Iraq.

~~~~ 

- Advertisement -

Of course a no-preemptive-strike policy limits options and confines strategy and makes less philosophic warriors moan in frustration. Since the ethical warrior's position requires someone to break Waite's dictum, in some ultimate sense, the ethical warrior always plays defense. More traditional fighters will call this approach impractical. What they mean by "impractical" is that they are initially placed in a vulnerable position. This presents real practical problems for the warrior that should not be minimized. The point is to plan with this constraint in mind, not to abandon the principle. We have often limited our strategic first-strike options in the past without serious harm. In many cases, by so doing, we have avoided harm not only to innocent people but also to ourselves.

~~~~ 

I don't see where you're going with this, Karl.   You've wandered off point to discuss the pros and cons of a no-preemptive strike policy.   We need to discuss the warrior's contractual agreement to forfeit his future right to decide if a proposed war is moral or not.  

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

Must Read 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.LastTrain2ElPaso.com

I am a retired physicist and hold a B.S. in Ch. E. as well. I have been an environmental activist since the early 1970s. I have been a writer of opinion pieces and other essays since about 1995 and am a published author of history. I have (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Currency in Fiat Monetary Systems in General and the US Federal Reserve System in Particular

The Trouble With Cash--a World Awash in $100 Federal Reserve Notes

"Small is Beautiful-Economics as if People Mattered"

The looming crisis of the death of Windows XP

We have been transformed into a pathocracy--Political Ponerology, a must read

"What It Is Like to Go to War", by Karl Marlantes--My Response