![]() |
By Rob Kall (about the author) Page 4 of 4 page(s)
There's another way to think about this. If hearings are held early, and Cheney resigns, then Bush resigns, and it's, say, May, then there's a new, squeaky clean rebublican president, representing recovery, renewal, change-- and all of a sudden, the Bush presidency is behind them, with five months to go until the election. THAT could be a problem for the Dems. The ideal timing is to start investigating Cheney in March, for him to resign in June, with a replacement confirmed by July, then hearings on Bush, that start in july, are put on hold during the summer hiatus, continued in September, with the worst, most damning testimony happening in October. Conyers told me that it would look pretty bad if the impeachment failed. Do YOU think he will fail to come up with worse dirt than he and Patrick Leahy and Chuck Schumer came up with, investigating Alberto Gonzales? Is Conyers being modest in expressing his concern? I'm hoping we'll see more developments as drama unfolds around the Meiers subpoena. For over 1000 additional articles on impeachment, click on the tags in the tag cloud to the right of the article.
Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, (more...)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 115 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |